Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood

From	Volney <volney@volney.invalid>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood
Date	2019-01-08 00:30 -0500
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<q11cdf$294$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <b6e2eb95-5ffc-4970-b1b0-227d4bdc55ab@googlegroups.com> <q0s9eo$ik0$1@dont-email.me> <ea5221a8-2159-4a47-b12a-6f2e776df55c@googlegroups.com> <q0usj5$keh$1@dont-email.me> <4922110d-c510-4a54-80f2-4585019f7fbd@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 1/7/2019 11:01 AM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 10:46:00 PM UTC-8, Volney wrote:
> 
>>> So, the fact that the vapor has a pressure that can be accounted for using Dalton's law does not mean that vapor and gas are equivalent in all other respects.
>>>
>>> Volney:
>>> I am not interested in whatever it is you call "vapor". All I am saying
>>> is that at, for example, 24C, the H2O phase diagram states that the
>>> stable phase of H2O is gas below 3,000 pascals.
>>
>>> Yeah, so?
>>
>> The difference in definitions (vapor == same as gas except only below
>> the critical temperature) is not important to this discussion.
> 
> 
> Answer my question you evasive jackass.

I already did. Vapor is gas below the critical temperature.

> 
>>> Volney:
>>> Dalton's Law states that
>>> the presence of other nonreacting gases (N2, O2) doesn't affect this,
>>>
>>> CD:
>>> What is "this"?
>>
>> "[at 24C] the stable phase of H2O is gas below 3,000 pascals."
>>
>>>   And where does Dalton's law state that it doesn't effect "this."
>>
>> That's the entire point of Dalton's Law! The presence of other gases
>> does not affect the individual gas behavior.
> 
> Answer the questions you evasive twit: 1) What is "this"? and 2) Where does Dalton's law state that it doesn't effect "this."

You have some sort of reading comprehension problem.

"This" is the fact that at 24C the stable phase of H2O is gas below 
3,000 pascals pressure.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalton%27s_law
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapor_pressure

That is as much as I am willing to spoonfeed you.

> Checkmate.
> 
> That was easy.

Yes, beating you was like taking candy from a baby.
> 
> James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes
>

Thread

Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 20:15 -0800
  Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-03 20:22 -0800
    Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 09:40 -0800
      Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-04 10:08 -0800
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 10:49 -0800
          Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-04 18:24 -0800
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-05 00:53 -0600
  Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-04 10:03 -0800
    Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-05 00:53 -0600
  Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-05 09:42 -0500
    Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-05 15:14 -0800
      Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 21:00 -0800
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-05 21:53 -0800
    Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 20:18 -0800
      Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-05 21:52 -0800
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-06 02:13 -0500
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 12:11 -0800
          Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-06 13:58 -0800
            Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 22:16 +0000
              Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-06 14:31 -0800
              Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:26 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-06 17:01 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 18:50 -0800
            Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:29 -0800
              Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-07 00:11 +0000
      Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-06 02:09 -0500
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 11:47 -0800
          Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-07 01:34 -0500
            Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-06 23:10 -0800
              Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-07 09:42 -0600
            Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 09:19 -0800
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 19:10 -0800
          Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-06 19:42 -0800
          Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-07 01:48 -0500
            Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 22:58 -0800
            Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-07 09:44 -0600
            Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 08:01 -0800
              Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-08 00:30 -0500
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-07 22:22 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-08 09:35 -0600
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 09:27 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-08 13:00 -0500
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 13:34 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-09 00:53 -0500
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 10:08 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 11:46 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-09 20:11 -0500
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 17:13 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-09 20:23 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 21:08 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 09:47 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-12 13:02 -0500
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 10:07 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 18:21 +0000
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-13 02:40 -0600
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 18:46 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 13:41 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-26 20:16 -0500
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 07:49 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-27 12:24 -0500
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 11:46 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 12:16 -0800

csiph-web