Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.checkmate > #227366

Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist...

From % <persent@gmail.com>
Newsgroups alt.checkmate, alt.fan.cyberchicken, alt.usenet.kooks
Subject Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist...
Date 2018-11-17 16:54 -0700
Organization Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Message-ID <bomv93.3hl.17.8@news.alt.net> (permalink)
References <mrnuud1d0hg852qer6qvdfmrc0nlijv6vm@4ax.com> <bokdk7.3oi.19.1@news.alt.net> <MPG.3659543dfcb6859a9956f9@news.altopia.com> <bokost.hvp.19.1@news.alt.net> <ou81vd9ceth13etrhn161mbi5hbhibv25k@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 2018-11-17 4:50 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 21:54:01 -0600, "Ms Kitty" <MsKitty@meow.mix> wrote:
> 
>> Neal, you are doing exactly what you got on Checkmate for doing with the
>> arrows.  Not to mention the groups you crossposted.
>>
>> Froggery!
> 
> Sorry, but that is just not the case. But, I forgive
> you your ignorance as you arrived late. Here's what
> has transpired.
> 
> Checkjerk started using stupid, long, non-standard
> attribution and I kicked his fat ass to the curb for
> it. He got pissed off and started acting like a little
> bitch and created a sock called Sir Gaygory's Owner.
> 
> In retaliation, I started frogging him right and left
> and he got his little pink bitch panties all in a wad
> and he said he'd *take care of me* and  *report me*
> to CC for forging him but CC just laughed his ass off
> upon hearing Checkbaby cry forgery when froggery
> was the actual case.
> 
> This made Checktears even more enraged so he
> hatched a plot where in his feeble mind he figured
> he'd then be able to report me for a real forgery.
> 
> I had been frogging him using *ricksabain@gmail.com*
> which is the switcheroo you noticed so what did my
> little bitch boi do? He registered *ricksabain@gmail.com*
> as his own.  He did this figuring to cause my froggery
> to become a real forgery and then he'd have me TOSed.
> 
> But, Checkloser didn't count on the fact that I read
> headers while he's too fucking lazy to and I noticed
> right away he, all of a sudden, had changed from
> ricksabian@gmail.com (he's the owner of that one) to
> ricksabain@gmail.com (just registered as his own)
> so, in order to not get caught engaging in forging, I
> immediately changed my Checkmate sock puppet to
> ricksabain@gmail.con and so easily thwarted his lame
> attempt to netKKKop me that I gave him hemorrhoids
> because, wait for it... *henceforth* he was clenching
> his gay ass so tightly together in utter frustration.
> 
> LOL. He bragged publicly how he was going to get
> rid of me and put me to shame and it backfired because
> I'm just so much more intelligent than he is. He thought
> his little scheme foolproof but, instead, it made a fool
> out of him because I caught him in the act.
> 
>> "Checkmate" <ricksabain1@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.3659543dfcb6859a9956f9@news.altopia.com...
> 
> Yes, the above is the real Checkbaby after having
> registered my switcheroo as his own.
> 
> Get it now?  NEVER has the Checkwannabe been so sorely
> put to.  He knows the name of his nemesis. LOL.
> 
> <...>
> 

{>ls!gwn=qWVu-gBz!:Sdq?6&cx`NZl^;N+W~.!nzr8g%5dZxi49!2_dxWj7!EN4&eH3o?D##fk'IE`g.#o9MSYJk+jjTr=.m6xQ*<{h#lPb|(PBapn-?4ZhT9/$waJ-')V\eU=dPe>"G!\:bgzDc5-Fdn1br,B\a&aqttOH;&h1Wz.A.4BCi(jc:m1b0\}$2!SDDi?

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-16 19:32 -0500
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 17:41 -0700
    Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 22:25 -0800
      Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Ms Kitty" <MsKitty@meow.mix> - 2018-11-16 21:54 -0600
        Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-17 18:50 -0500
          Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 16:54 -0700
          Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-17 18:59 -0500
            Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-17 19:14 -0500
              Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-17 19:19 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-17 19:30 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-17 19:33 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 17:45 -0700
          Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 20:28 -0800
            Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-17 20:30 -0500
            Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-18 08:40 -0500
              Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 10:51 -0800
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-18 11:20 -0500
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-16 21:41 -0500
    Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-17 10:53 -0600
      Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 12:29 -0500
        Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-17 14:05 -0600
          Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 16:57 -0500
            Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 14:58 -0700
              Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 17:19 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 15:21 -0700
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 17:55 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 16:09 -0700
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 22:24 -0800
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 11:49 -0600

csiph-web