Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #474825

Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation

From	Volney <volney@volney.invalid>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation
Date	2018-10-13 11:45 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<ppt3v0$28b$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(14 earlier) <8e939c0e-6dee-472a-bf5a-f26f6a99d289@googlegroups.com> <ppr9on$1m7j$2@gioia.aioe.org> <0a88fe19-2e40-44d8-a142-45051f6104e1@googlegroups.com> <pprlvh$bs0$1@dont-email.me> <ppt25u$969$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/13/2018 11:15 AM, Gil Callow wrote:
> Volney wrote:
> 
>>>> small cross-section high energy focused one point, ever become
>>>> "natural".
>>>> Nowhere in this universe.
>>>
>>> I asked for some evidence, not hearsay and guesswork.
>>>
>>>> If it were "natural", it would have been stupid to build such one.
>>>
>>> The question is in the energy level.
>>>
>> If the "God Particle" isn't enough for you, there was the "Oh My God!"
>> Particle, a cosmic ray which apparently had the energy of dozens of
>> Joules (no missing prefix!) in a single particle. It was detected as an
>> enormous secondary cosmic ray shower. This was several orders of
>> magnitude more energy than the best our particle accelerators can do.
> 
> You already missed the point, as cranks do. Which is "small cross-
> section". Which reveals you being illiterate in mathematics and associated
> branches as well.
> 

You snipped this, nymshifter.

> If there was any danger of micro black holes being formed, it, or all its likely predecessors over the eons, probably would have done so by now. It would have had to impact some unfortunate nitrogen atom high in the atmosphere to initiate the shower. 

A nitrogen atom is a "small cross-section".

Thread

deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-07 09:59 -0700
  Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 10:10 -0700
    Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-07 11:40 -0700
      Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 18:06 -0700
  Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Paul Gish <uop@uwrwuao.tc> - 2018-10-09 14:12 +0000
    Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 10:57 -0700
      Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 13:01 -0700
        Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 13:26 -0700
          Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:10 -0700
            Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:56 -0700
  Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:03 -0700
    Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 14:18 -0700
      Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:30 -0700
        Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:35 -0700
          Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 14:48 -0700
            Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:59 -0700
              Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 15:46 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 15:49 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 16:07 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 16:25 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 17:35 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-09 20:30 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 14:43 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-11 08:24 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 11:56 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-12 08:48 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 12:04 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 13:03 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-12 13:06 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:08 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-12 13:25 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:42 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-12 21:09 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 14:44 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-12 23:12 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 16:45 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-10-12 22:40 -0400
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 19:51 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 15:16 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 15:15 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-10-13 11:45 -0400
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 16:02 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-10-13 12:43 -0400
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-10-13 19:06 +0200
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 20:21 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-10-14 00:22 -0400
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-14 16:34 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 20:16 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 15:18 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-12 14:11 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 10:00 -0700
        Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 14:43 -0700
          Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 15:02 -0700

csiph-web