Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #474818

Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation

From	Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation
Date	2018-10-13 15:15 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<ppt25u$969$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(14 earlier) <ppr2hq$18k8$5@gioia.aioe.org> <8e939c0e-6dee-472a-bf5a-f26f6a99d289@googlegroups.com> <ppr9on$1m7j$2@gioia.aioe.org> <0a88fe19-2e40-44d8-a142-45051f6104e1@googlegroups.com> <pprlvh$bs0$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Volney wrote:

>>> small cross-section high energy focused one point, ever become
>>> "natural".
>>> Nowhere in this universe.
>> 
>> I asked for some evidence, not hearsay and guesswork.
>> 
>>> If it were "natural", it would have been stupid to build such one.
>> 
>> The question is in the energy level.
>> 
> If the "God Particle" isn't enough for you, there was the "Oh My God!"
> Particle, a cosmic ray which apparently had the energy of dozens of
> Joules (no missing prefix!) in a single particle. It was detected as an
> enormous secondary cosmic ray shower. This was several orders of
> magnitude more energy than the best our particle accelerators can do.

You already missed the point, as cranks do. Which is "small cross-
section". Which reveals you being illiterate in mathematics and associated 
branches as well.

Thread

deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-07 09:59 -0700
  Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 10:10 -0700
    Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-07 11:40 -0700
      Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 18:06 -0700
  Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Paul Gish <uop@uwrwuao.tc> - 2018-10-09 14:12 +0000
    Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 10:57 -0700
      Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 13:01 -0700
        Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 13:26 -0700
          Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:10 -0700
            Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:56 -0700
  Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:03 -0700
    Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 14:18 -0700
      Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:30 -0700
        Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:35 -0700
          Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 14:48 -0700
            Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:59 -0700
              Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 15:46 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 15:49 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 16:07 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 16:25 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 17:35 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-09 20:30 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 14:43 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-11 08:24 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 11:56 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-12 08:48 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 12:04 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 13:03 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-12 13:06 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:08 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-12 13:25 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:42 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-12 21:09 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 14:44 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-12 23:12 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 16:45 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-10-12 22:40 -0400
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 19:51 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 15:16 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 15:15 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-10-13 11:45 -0400
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 16:02 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-10-13 12:43 -0400
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-10-13 19:06 +0200
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 20:21 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-10-14 00:22 -0400
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-14 16:34 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 20:16 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 15:18 +0000
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-12 14:11 -0700
                Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 10:00 -0700
        Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 14:43 -0700
          Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 15:02 -0700

csiph-web