Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #474801
| From | Volney <volney@volney.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation |
| Date | 2018-10-12 22:40 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <pprlvh$bs0$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <0e9c5985-753d-428f-aee8-be75e0c453e8@googlegroups.com> <ppr2hq$18k8$5@gioia.aioe.org> <8e939c0e-6dee-472a-bf5a-f26f6a99d289@googlegroups.com> <ppr9on$1m7j$2@gioia.aioe.org> <0a88fe19-2e40-44d8-a142-45051f6104e1@googlegroups.com> |
On 10/12/2018 7:45 PM, JanPB wrote: > On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 4:12:29 PM UTC-7, Gil Callow wrote: >> JanPB wrote: >> >>> On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 2:09:19 PM UTC-7, Gil Callow wrote: >>>> JanPB wrote: >>>>> Until you present your case, there is nothing to discuss. Bye for >>>>> now. >>>> >>>> Here we go. How do you like it? >>>> https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1025243/black-hole-end-of-the- >> world-martin-rees-large-hadron-collider-particle-accelerator >>>> "Astronomer Royal Lord Martin Rees believes experiments at places like >>>> the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) could have deadly consequences for life >>>> on Earth." >>> >>> I heard that way back when but what is Rees' answer to the claim that >>> those collisions occur all the time naturally? >> >> small cross-section high energy focused one point, ever become "natural". >> Nowhere in this universe. > > I asked for some evidence, not hearsay and guesswork. > >> If it were "natural", it would have been stupid >> to build such one. > > The question is in the energy level. > If the "God Particle" isn't enough for you, there was the "Oh My God!" Particle, a cosmic ray which apparently had the energy of dozens of Joules (no missing prefix!) in a single particle. It was detected as an enormous secondary cosmic ray shower. This was several orders of magnitude more energy than the best our particle accelerators can do. If there was any danger of micro black holes being formed, it, or all its likely predecessors over the eons, probably would have done so by now. It would have had to impact some unfortunate nitrogen atom high in the atmosphere to initiate the shower.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-07 09:59 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 10:10 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-07 11:40 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 18:06 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Paul Gish <uop@uwrwuao.tc> - 2018-10-09 14:12 +0000
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 10:57 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 13:01 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 13:26 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:10 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:56 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:03 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 14:18 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:30 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:35 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 14:48 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:59 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 15:46 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 15:49 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 16:07 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 16:25 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 17:35 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-09 20:30 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 14:43 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-11 08:24 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 11:56 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-12 08:48 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 12:04 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 13:03 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-12 13:06 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:08 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-12 13:25 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:42 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-12 21:09 +0000
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 14:44 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-12 23:12 +0000
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 16:45 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-10-12 22:40 -0400
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 19:51 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 15:16 +0000
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 15:15 +0000
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-10-13 11:45 -0400
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 16:02 +0000
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-10-13 12:43 -0400
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-10-13 19:06 +0200
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 20:21 +0000
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-10-14 00:22 -0400
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-14 16:34 +0000
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 20:16 +0000
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Gil Callow <snam@nawem.co> - 2018-10-13 15:18 +0000
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-12 14:11 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 10:00 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation alsor@interia.pl - 2018-10-09 14:43 -0700
Re: deflection of light - another wrong calculation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 15:02 -0700
csiph-web