Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #473831
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) |
| Date | 2018-10-02 17:08 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pp08n6$1bfq$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <666c18f3-b320-4d85-8f62-164e1457d260@googlegroups.com> <potcau$fgr$1@gioia.aioe.org> <c5e8b9d0-9019-4ea3-8e88-6e08667bd92f@googlegroups.com> <pou3li$1qs6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ec6b1d01-7cbf-4a1c-bf77-7c86606decef@googlegroups.com> |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 5:30:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>> On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 10:52:17 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, September 29, 2018 at 6:03:34 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On Saturday, September 29, 2018 at 11:25:16 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 6:05:34 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 2:37:24 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 9:10:49 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 12:54:49 PM UTC-4, Edward Prochak wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 12:11:54 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> writes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 at 8:52:52 PM UTC-4, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 at 4:29:27 PM UTC-4, Edward Prochak wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey idiot, I didn't nym shifted.... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It sounds as you did. You nym'ed as someone defending you. You are a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheater and a liar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hilton Packett is not me. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assertion is not a valid argument. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stupid Ken is right for once. "Hilton Packett" is the nymshifting troll, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not Ken. Ken is too stupid to know how to nymshift. I don't know why the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nymshifter is defending Ken. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also IRT is not a subset of any other theory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes it is. You STOLE it from another crackpot, and put ur name on it and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copyrighted it, just like de cheater you are. Remember, you DID admit to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me this in the past, when I confronted you with an exact same copy of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your irt. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stupid Ken stole IRT? And that means there's someone else out there just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as stupid as Ken?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is getting interesting. It explains a lot, like why Ken cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do even a simple calculation from "his own" formula for gravity. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No idiot,I said that I don’t want to do what you asked me to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do. It is beneath me. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lol. Doing what all physicists do is beneath you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is beneath me to do work for amateur like you the woodworker and Ed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It’s beneath you apparently to do it for anyone. You haven’t done it for >>>>>>>>>>>> physicists, you haven’t done it for anyone. Physicists do the calculations >>>>>>>>>>>> as part of what they do. You want special dispensation just because you >>>>>>>>>>>> don’t know how to do it? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I haven’t encountered any real physicists here-- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Oh I get that. So here’s your plan. Make sure you ONLY talk about your >>>>>>>>>> theory in places where you are sure there are no physicists. Then when >>>>>>>>>> someone points out that you have not produced what physicists produce, then >>>>>>>>>> you will say you don’t owe that to anyone but physicists. In this way you >>>>>>>>>> think you can go on pretending you have done physics, among people you >>>>>>>>>> regard as being nonphysicists. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don’t owe anything to anyone. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All physicists publish their calculationse . Not just write equations. You >>>>>>>> say you don’t owe that to anyone. Ok so you’re not going to do physics. >>>>>>>> You’re just going to pretend. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Einstein’s 1905 paper just write down equations. >>>>>> >>>>>> He wrote five papers in 1905. And he did do calculations in papers other >>>>>> than the one you’ve cherry picked. >>>>> >>>>> What other 1905 Einstein papers contains calculations? >>>> >>>> The other four. >>>> >>>> I assume you know what they were about. >>> >>> I was not able to find any 1905 Einstein papers that contains calculations. >> >> This is perhaps because you have no knowledge of any of the other papers he >> wrote in 1905, and you have no idea how to find out. >> >> Here’s a hint for one of them. Brownian motion, complete with calculations. > > We are not talking about Brownian motion. We are talking about the 1905 > SR paper compared with my IRT paper. Don’t cherry pick. Einstein wrote many papers on relativity, and he showed many calculations. You’ve shown no calculations. None. > >> >> >>> In any case, his SR paper is parallel to my IRT paper--both contain no >>> calculation. Also your opinion is not important--you carry no weight in >>> the physics community. >> >> There is nobody that carries any weight with you. > > I value Tom Roberts’ posts. He doesn’t make blanket statements like you. >> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Pretend what? I just published a new theory of relativity...no pretend >>>>>>> there. I didn’t demand that you accept that I am a physicist. I am not, I >>>>>>> am Chemical Engineer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I invented a new theory of the universe, a real physicist would try to >>>>>>>>> understand my theory ask me relevant questions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Don’t indulge your fantasies. A real physicist would ask you for your >>>>>>>> calculations. Or, not seeing any calculations, would just ignore you >>>>>>>> completely. Notice that the latter is what’s happened. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So I am not a real physicist. So what? Does that mean that I can’t have a >>>>>>> new theory of relativity? I don’t think so. >>>>>> >>>>>> But you don’t. Your “theory” lacks calculations. >>>>> >>>>> So? >>>> >>>> So, physicists won’t regard it as a theory until you fix that. >>> >>> You are not a physicist--you are a woodworker. >> >> That’s right. And you’ve gotten zero attention from physicists either. For >> the reason mentioned. > > Perhaps they are too embarrassed to aka many comments. > Oh, get real, Ken. Invent as many fantasies as you need to protect yourself from the truth. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 17:13 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-24 12:38 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 01:20 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 01:38 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 06:47 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:13 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 17:54 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 02:39 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 06:32 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:13 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 17:57 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 02:39 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-24 18:17 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Hilton Packett <wod@wcothr.ce> - 2018-09-24 20:09 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:29 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Hilton Packett <wod@wcothr.ce> - 2018-09-25 22:29 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) herbertglazier0@gmail.com - 2018-09-25 16:55 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 17:52 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 20:11 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-26 04:11 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:54 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-26 14:00 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-26 21:29 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 01:10 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-27 06:47 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:37 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-28 13:18 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 22:05 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-29 08:11 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 15:25 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-29 12:40 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-29 20:03 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:03 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-30 19:07 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:52 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-01 11:46 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:30 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-02 07:30 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:08 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 08:37 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-29 09:20 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 15:00 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:31 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-01 11:51 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:30 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-02 07:21 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:08 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:27 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-03 06:03 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-03 13:38 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-03 09:10 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 07:41 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:24 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-03 05:59 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 07:43 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 06:20 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-28 07:10 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-28 16:45 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 13:39 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-26 13:57 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:42 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-27 12:46 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 06:30 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-28 06:56 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 09:41 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 13:44 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 09:43 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 13:51 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:30 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 14:41 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:47 -0700
csiph-web