Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #473714
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) |
| Date | 2018-10-01 21:30 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pou3li$1qs6$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <08888b07-21d1-4fc9-a6f1-b00270b07bb3@googlegroups.com> <poosrh$1igu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <666c18f3-b320-4d85-8f62-164e1457d260@googlegroups.com> <potcau$fgr$1@gioia.aioe.org> <c5e8b9d0-9019-4ea3-8e88-6e08667bd92f@googlegroups.com> |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 10:52:17 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>> On Saturday, September 29, 2018 at 6:03:34 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, September 29, 2018 at 11:25:16 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 6:05:34 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 2:37:24 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 9:10:49 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 12:54:49 PM UTC-4, Edward Prochak wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 12:11:54 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> writes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 at 8:52:52 PM UTC-4, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 at 4:29:27 PM UTC-4, Edward Prochak wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey idiot, I didn't nym shifted.... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It sounds as you did. You nym'ed as someone defending you. You are a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheater and a liar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hilton Packett is not me. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assertion is not a valid argument. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stupid Ken is right for once. "Hilton Packett" is the nymshifting troll, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not Ken. Ken is too stupid to know how to nymshift. I don't know why the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nymshifter is defending Ken. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also IRT is not a subset of any other theory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes it is. You STOLE it from another crackpot, and put ur name on it and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copyrighted it, just like de cheater you are. Remember, you DID admit to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me this in the past, when I confronted you with an exact same copy of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your irt. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stupid Ken stole IRT? And that means there's someone else out there just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as stupid as Ken?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is getting interesting. It explains a lot, like why Ken cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>>> do even a simple calculation from "his own" formula for gravity. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No idiot,I said that I don’t want to do what you asked me to >>>>>>>>>>>>> do. It is beneath me. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Lol. Doing what all physicists do is beneath you. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is beneath me to do work for amateur like you the woodworker and Ed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It’s beneath you apparently to do it for anyone. You haven’t done it for >>>>>>>>>> physicists, you haven’t done it for anyone. Physicists do the calculations >>>>>>>>>> as part of what they do. You want special dispensation just because you >>>>>>>>>> don’t know how to do it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I haven’t encountered any real physicists here-- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Oh I get that. So here’s your plan. Make sure you ONLY talk about your >>>>>>>> theory in places where you are sure there are no physicists. Then when >>>>>>>> someone points out that you have not produced what physicists produce, then >>>>>>>> you will say you don’t owe that to anyone but physicists. In this way you >>>>>>>> think you can go on pretending you have done physics, among people you >>>>>>>> regard as being nonphysicists. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don’t owe anything to anyone. >>>>>> >>>>>> All physicists publish their calculationse . Not just write equations. You >>>>>> say you don’t owe that to anyone. Ok so you’re not going to do physics. >>>>>> You’re just going to pretend. >>>>> >>>>> Einstein’s 1905 paper just write down equations. >>>> >>>> He wrote five papers in 1905. And he did do calculations in papers other >>>> than the one you’ve cherry picked. >>> >>> What other 1905 Einstein papers contains calculations? >> >> The other four. >> >> I assume you know what they were about. > > I was not able to find any 1905 Einstein papers that contains calculations. This is perhaps because you have no knowledge of any of the other papers he wrote in 1905, and you have no idea how to find out. Here’s a hint for one of them. Brownian motion, complete with calculations. > In any case, his SR paper is parallel to my IRT paper--both contain no > calculation. Also your opinion is not important--you carry no weight in > the physics community. There is nobody that carries any weight with you. > >> >>> >>>> >>>>> Pretend what? I just published a new theory of relativity...no pretend >>>>> there. I didn’t demand that you accept that I am a physicist. I am not, I >>>>> am Chemical Engineer. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I invented a new theory of the universe, a real physicist would try to >>>>>>> understand my theory ask me relevant questions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Don’t indulge your fantasies. A real physicist would ask you for your >>>>>> calculations. Or, not seeing any calculations, would just ignore you >>>>>> completely. Notice that the latter is what’s happened. >>>>> >>>>> So I am not a real physicist. So what? Does that mean that I can’t have a >>>>> new theory of relativity? I don’t think so. >>>> >>>> But you don’t. Your “theory” lacks calculations. >>> >>> So? >> >> So, physicists won’t regard it as a theory until you fix that. > > You are not a physicist--you are a woodworker. That’s right. And you’ve gotten zero attention from physicists either. For the reason mentioned. > > > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 17:13 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-24 12:38 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 01:20 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 01:38 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 06:47 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:13 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 17:54 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 02:39 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 06:32 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:13 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 17:57 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 02:39 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-24 18:17 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Hilton Packett <wod@wcothr.ce> - 2018-09-24 20:09 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:29 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Hilton Packett <wod@wcothr.ce> - 2018-09-25 22:29 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) herbertglazier0@gmail.com - 2018-09-25 16:55 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 17:52 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 20:11 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-26 04:11 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:54 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-26 14:00 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-26 21:29 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 01:10 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-27 06:47 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:37 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-28 13:18 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 22:05 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-29 08:11 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 15:25 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-29 12:40 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-29 20:03 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:03 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-30 19:07 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:52 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-01 11:46 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:30 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-02 07:30 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:08 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 08:37 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-29 09:20 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 15:00 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:31 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-01 11:51 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:30 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-02 07:21 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:08 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:27 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-03 06:03 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-03 13:38 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-03 09:10 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 07:41 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:24 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-03 05:59 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 07:43 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 06:20 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-28 07:10 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-28 16:45 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 13:39 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-26 13:57 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:42 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-27 12:46 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 06:30 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-28 06:56 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 09:41 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 13:44 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 09:43 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 13:51 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:30 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 14:41 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:47 -0700
csiph-web