Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #699490
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Which Hawking are we talking about ? |
| Date | 2018-08-21 17:22 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pli3bm$178h$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <99a1f522-c324-4b42-b8b7-9fbeb59e7c22@googlegroups.com> <plhhir$a2r$1@gioia.aioe.org> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Aug.21--2.18pm.Seattle.2018> <plhvt4$11sq$1@gioia.aioe.org> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Aug.21--2.49pm.Seattle.2018> |
On 8/21/2018 4:49 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> Hawking said black holes don't hide information from us. >> >> but the information does not get out. you have to go there to look at it. >> as you approach the surface of a black hole, time approachs 0 so things >> fall to the surface of the black hole and stay stuck there. > > A true black hole, an _ ideal black hole, > can't exist because it'd have zero entropy. a black hole does have a quantifiable entropy, which can decrease by thermal radiation at the expense of dumping that lost entropy into the surrounding universe. > > No one has ever, nor could ever, _ measure zero entropy, > with _ infinite precision. > And, if we can't measure it, then it's random, unknown. > > From our perspective, here on earth, > an _ infinite amount of time passes before > a falling object reaches the event horizon. > > But, before then, the black hole evaporates, > and all information is returned to us. >
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Hawking on the conservation of information Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 18:47 -0700
Re: Hawking on the conservation of information Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-20 21:00 -0500
Re: Hawking on the conservation of information Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 05:32 -0700
Re: Hawking on the conservation of information Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-21 10:32 -0500
Re: Hawking on the conservation of information Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 08:52 -0700
Re: Hawking on the conservation of information Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-21 12:19 -0500
Re: Hawking on the conservation of information Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 10:28 -0700
Which Hawking are we talking about ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-08-21 14:18 -0700
Re: Which Hawking are we talking about ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-21 16:23 -0500
Which Hawking are we talking about ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-08-21 14:49 -0700
Re: Which Hawking are we talking about ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-21 17:22 -0500
Re: Which Hawking are we talking about ? Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 14:47 -0700
When ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-08-21 14:52 -0700
Re: When ? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-08-23 16:39 -0700
Re: Hawking on the conservation of information benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 09:27 -0400
Re: Hawking on the conservation of information Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 07:59 -0700
Re: Hawking on the conservation of information mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 17:56 -0700
csiph-web