Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #467347

Re: Why haven't we had another scientific revolution in physics yet? Hasn't it been long enough since general relativity and quantum mechanics? - Quora

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Why haven't we had another scientific revolution in physics yet? Hasn't it been long enough since general relativity and quantum mechanics? - Quora
Date	2018-08-08 22:28 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<pkfqqn$1269$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<4010cac5-8f40-4ff3-9442-581b8fc72afa@googlegroups.com> <pkf7o2$2jb$1@gioia.aioe.org> <90bc3338-df88-4dbe-9463-4429e88f14a2@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 1:03:02 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>> The following questions were asked in Quora:
>>> Why haven't we had another scientific revolution in physics yet? Hasn't
>>> it been long enough since general relativity and quantum mechanics? 
>> 
>> Well, let’s see. 
>> Scientific revolutions you may have forgotten: 
>> - quantum field theory in 1950s
> 
> QFT cannot be a scientific revolution because it does not include a
> quantum field theory of gravity.

You don’t get to set that bar. QFT has been an ENORMOUS scientific
revolution even if there are some open questions about it. Darwin’s
evolution was also a scientific revolution though it was not the complete
answer and still isn’t. 

> 
>> - electroweak unification in 1960s
> 
> That’s not a scientific revolution.

The hell it isn’t. The successful unification of two different fundamental
interactions that led to a HALF DOZEN Nobel prizes is most certainly a
scientific revolution. 

> 
>> - inflationary cosmology in 1980s
> 
> This is not a scientific revolution. 

The hell it isn’t. You obviously know nothing of its impact or the puzzles
it has solved. 

> It is an assumption to explanation the observed behavior of the universe.
> Model Mechanics eliminated the inflationary cosmology.

No one accepts that. 

> 
>> 
>> All of which have been exquisitely validated in experimental tests in
>> subsequent decades. 
>> 
>> How often do you think a scientific revolution should happen?

Answer!?

>> 
>>> 
>>> My Answer:
>>> Model Mechanics could be the next scientific revolution in physics and cosmology.
>>> 
>>> The main features of Model Mechanics are as follows:
>>> 
>>> It offers a realistic origin of the universe.
>>> 
>>> It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters.
>>> 
>>> It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes.
>>> 
>>> It provides a mechanism to amalgamate all the forces of nature.
>>> 
>>> It can be validated experimentally.
>>> 
>>> It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT).
>>> 
>>> It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG)
>>> 
>>> It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity as subsets.
>>> 
>>> It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics.
>>> 
>>> It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force.
>>> 
>>> It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle.
>>> 
>>> It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum experiments.
>>> 
>>> It explains the structures of atoms.
>>> 
>>> A book on Model Mechanics is available in the following link:
>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/20...
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

csiph-web