Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #697326

Re: We don't know what we don't know

From Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: We don't know what we don't know
Date 2018-08-06 16:35 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <pkaevk$n4v$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <pk9k7t$177g$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b0e80e0d-ab20-43a6-95fd-9aeb470a006f@googlegroups.com> <pk9pac$1got$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pka9qu$f28$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pkaegn$m6e$3@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On 8/6/2018 4:27 PM, benj wrote:
> On 8/6/2018 4:07 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 8/6/2018 10:26 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>> <alal65536@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Monday, August 6, 2018 at 7:29:30 PM UTC+5:30, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> On 8/6/2018 6:44 AM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> My quest for truth is to understand myself and the world better.
>>>>>> Scientists search for simple laws that describe the natural world.
>>>>>> With classical physics, scientist felt they had discovered almost
>>>>>> everything and the process was ending.  Then came relativity and
>>>>>> quantum mechanics.  The end is but the beginning.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The famous quote about unknown unknowns is from Donald Rumsfeld, a US
>>>>>> Congressman.  But does it also apply to physics?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mathematics hates contradictions.
>>>>>
>>>>> no so, they are very useful.
>>>>>
>>>>>> And physics can be said to be empirical with theory of applied
>>>>>> mathematics.  But even in physics there is contradiction.  Wave
>>>>>> particle duality is considered by some to be a contradiction.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to arxiv.org, in "Types of paradoxes in physics",
>>>>>> 'axioms of
>>>>>> a formal system allow for the possibility of contradiction'.  And
>>>>>> physics is somewhat a formal system.
>>>>>
>>>>> not sure what you mean by "formal system", as physics is disparate
>>>>> collection.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We will never discover everything, I suspect.  But we can continue to
>>>>>> have a better understanding of ourselves and the world. 
>>>>>> Understanding
>>>>>> ourselves is just as important as understanding the rest of the
>>>>>> world.
>>>>>> Biology is just as important as physics.  But what are the limits
>>>>>> to our understanding?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I only read that one paper on arxiv.org, but I need to understand
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> about how much a thing (human, in this case) can understand
>>>>>> itself, and
>>>>>> how biased our physics is because it was discovered/created by
>>>>>> humans.
>>>>>
>>>>> physics is not biased.
>>>>
>>>> Is the human mind, connected to the human senses like vision and
>>>> hearing,
>>>> specific to humans and other earth species.  Might aliens in other
>>>> world
>>>> have different kind of minds and sense organs, perceiving the world
>>>> differently.  So is our physics biased based on our specific type of
>>>> mind and body?
>>>>
>>>> Abhinav Lal
>>>
>>> I think you should first of all be clear that most of the work that
>>> is done
>>> in physics today does not involve sensory data collection. Most
>>> experimental observation now involves the design of instruments and
>>> detectors that are sensitive to phenomena wholly outside our sensory
>>> domain, and the output of those instruments and detectors is almost
>>> entirely processed and analyzed using digital algorithms on computers.
>>
>> "Physics" is huge, many subjects, many approches.
>>
>> but take cosmic ray characterization,
>> the "Flys Eye" array, consisted of hundreds of PMTs with filters, with
>> amplifiers, adjustable gain, looking at mirrors, aimed at sectors of the
>> night sky, to detect faint light in the atmosphere (located in very dark
>> place), timestamp and corrolate data, build 3D model from data to
>> determine direction, then ID source in sky (very difficult)
>>
>> Just think how poorly Aliens would do if they could read each others
>> minds, disagree, and argue quietly all the time with each other, if you
>> had 10 Aliens, there would be 55 arguments going on (10*11/2).  Who says
>> all aliens would agree like in our hollywood movies?
> \
> 
> Odd says the answer to getting agreement is to live in a collective.


dictatorships lead to getting agreements, quick and fast, like Trump,

'a collective' is so..... 60's, and one has to ware bell bottom pants
all that retro stuff, and say "far out", there is a you tube video on it.


> 
> Resistance is futile.

Resistance is Voltage/Current too

but is futile = Voltage/Current or voltage/current = futile ?

Quote a Clinton => it depends upon what the word 'is' is.


> 
> 
> 
> 
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me close this discussion with some quotes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "The more I know, the less I know"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> the huge # of problems are not solvable with math, anything over 5
>>>>> dimensions or 5 degrees of freedom typically.
>>>>>
>>>>> a complex move by a hand on a robot, must be taught to it, as the
>>>>> optimum path is not solvable by math.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Abhinav Lal
>>>>>> Writer & Investor
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "I am a contradiction,
>>>>>> There is no logical solution"
>>>>>
>>>>> too general.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

We don't know what we don't know alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 04:44 -0700
  Re: We don't know what we don't know Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 12:11 +0000
    Re: We don't know what we don't know alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 05:55 -0700
    Re: We don't know what we don't know alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 07:34 -0700
      Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 10:21 -0500
        Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 14:21 -0400
      Re: We don't know what we don't know Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 15:21 +0000
        Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 14:05 -0400
      The uncaused cause. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-08-12 17:11 -0700
    Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 14:03 -0400
    Re: We don't know what we don't know john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 07:17 -0700
      Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 11:22 -0400
  Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 08:59 -0500
    Re: We don't know what we don't know alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 07:42 -0700
      Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 10:20 -0500
      Re: We don't know what we don't know Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 15:26 +0000
        Re: We don't know what we don't know alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 09:29 -0700
          Re: We don't know what we don't know Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 16:43 +0000
            Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 14:23 -0400
          Re: We don't know what we don't know "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-08-06 14:45 -0700
            Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 16:57 -0500
              Re: We don't know what we don't know "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-08-08 23:39 -0700
          Re: We don't know what we don't know Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 17:10 -0700
        Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 14:08 -0400
        Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 15:07 -0500
          Re: We don't know what we don't know benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 17:27 -0400
            Re: We don't know what we don't know Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-06 16:35 -0500
    Re: We don't know what we don't know poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-08-13 15:59 -0700
  Re: We don't know what we don't know Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 16:59 -0700
  We're ten times more retarded than we can imagine. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-08-12 16:53 -0700
    Re: We're ten times more retarded than we can imagine. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-12 22:59 -0500
      Re: We're ten times more retarded than we can imagine. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 11:42 -0400
    Re: We're ten times more retarded than we can imagine. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-08-13 13:42 -0700

csiph-web