Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #689583

Re: Particle physics 2

From Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Particle physics 2
Date 2018-06-08 18:48 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <pff4ka$12kb$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <20a7649f-d3da-4d46-99df-da72ae0563d6@googlegroups.com> <pfbqjl$1gf6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pfen4r$duf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pfepq8$ig5$3@gioia.aioe.org> <S4ESC.215397$o43.84921@fx33.iad>

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/8/2018 6:13 PM, benj wrote:
> On 6/8/2018 4:43 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>> On 6/7/2018 12:39 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> <numbernumber1964@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> The masses of the subatomic particles are measured using the curve
>>>>> paths
>>>>> of the liquid hydrogen bubble tracks within the bubble chamber that
>>>>> established particle physics. Initially, an accelerated proton beam is
>>>>> incident to an external metallic target that collision produces
>>>>> subatomic
>>>>> particles that propagate through the steel enclosure of the bubble
>>>>> chamber and interact with the hydrogen atoms forming the hydrogen
>>>>> bubble
>>>>> tracks but the subatomic particles that have a mass cannot propagate
>>>>> through the steel enclosure of the bubble chamber without producing a
>>>>> hole in the bubble chamber and causing an explosion of the liquid
>>>>> hydrogen. Rutherford's gold foil experiment is used to justify
>>>>> subatomic
>>>>> particles propagating through the bubble chamber but Rutherford's
>>>>> alpha
>>>>> particles cannot propagate through a quarter inch thick steel plate.
>>>>> Muons produced by the atmospheric decay of cosmic rays are also
>>>>> used to
>>>>> justify subatomic particles propagating through the steel enclosure of
>>>>> the bubble chamber but a muon is 200 times more massive than an
>>>>> electron.
>>>>> A 2000 W arc welder's electron beam can cut and weld steel. A high
>>>>> density of high energy muons propagating through the steel
>>>>> enclosure of
>>>>> the bubble chamber would result in the formation of a hole in the
>>>>> bubble
>>>>> chamber and a hydrogen explosion. The Soudan muon detector that is
>>>>> located at the bottom of a 1,800 meters deep mine shaft (Ayre, p.
>>>>> 2) is
>>>>> used to justify subatomic particles propagating through the steel
>>>>> enclosure of the bubble chamber but a muon that has a mass larger
>>>>> than an
>>>>> electron cannot propagate through more than 1,400 meters of
>>>>> bedrock. It
>>>>> is more likely that the Soudan muon detector is detecting radioactive
>>>>> isotopes that exist at the bottom of the former Soudan iron mine. The
>>>>> CERN Large Hadron Collider LHC (2017) describes a hadron (proton) beam
>>>>> that is accelerated using a beam pipe and superconducting magnets
>>>>> but a
>>>>> magnetic field does not accelerate protons. Using an analogy, a
>>>>> solenoid's magnetic force alters the position of the iron armature but
>>>>> solenoid's magnetic field does not affect the position of wood chips,
>>>>> charged dust particles or protons. The cyclotron is used to justify
>>>>> the
>>>>> acceleration of the hadron beam. The cyclotron accelerates protons and
>>>>> alpha particles where the cyclotron particles are accelerated using an
>>>>> electric potential between two halves of the cyclotron semi-circle
>>>>> metal
>>>>> apparatus but the cyclotron charged particles would be attracted to
>>>>> the
>>>>> charged semi-circle metallic apparatus preventing the acceleration
>>>>> of the
>>>>> protons or alpha particles. Using an analogy, an electron beam of
>>>>> an arc
>>>>> welder is formed when the electrons are propagating from towards a
>>>>> positive charged anode and collide with the positive charged
>>>>> surface yet
>>>>> the Lawence Livermore cyclotron depicts the particle beam with a blue
>>>>> colored light emission. The LHC experiment is based on hadron beams
>>>>> consisting of disassociated hydrogen gas molecules but the
>>>>> disassociation
>>>>> of hydrogen would result in an extremely unstable protons. Proton beam
>>>>> therapy is used to justify the existence of a proton beam but protons
>>>>> that have a mass 1,000 times greater than an electron would destroy
>>>>> human
>>>>> skin, bone and tissue in the path of the proton beam similar to the
>>>>> affects of an arch welder. It is more likely that gamma rays are
>>>>> producing the effects of proton beam therapy. The LHC 27 km
>>>>> circumference
>>>>> beam pipe and superconducting magnets do not accelerate the proton
>>>>> beam
>>>>> since a magnetic field effects metal objects such as a carpenter nail,
>>>>> paper clip or iron filings. A magnet does not affect the position
>>>>> of wood
>>>>> chips, charged dust particles or protons. The RF cavity is used to
>>>>> accelerate the protons but the electric field of the RF cavity would
>>>>> result in the protons to collided with the negative surface. It is
>>>>> questionable what is the purposed of the 27 km circumference beam pipe
>>>>> and superconducting magnets since the RF cavity is ostensibly
>>>>> accelerating the protons not the 27 km circumference beam pipe and
>>>>> magnets. It would have been much cheaper to build a series of RF
>>>>> cavities
>>>>> facing each other and eliminating the extremely expensive 27 km
>>>>> circumference beam pipe and superconducting magnets. The two
>>>>> accelerated
>>>>> proton beams propagate through the 27 km circumference beam pipe
>>>>> and are
>>>>> combined within the Atlas particle physics detector which is used
>>>>> to form
>>>>> the images of the two proton beam's collision that is used to
>>>>> justify the
>>>>> existence of subatomic particles but the the detector is composed of
>>>>> concentric metal cylinders around the interaction point where the
>>>>> proton
>>>>> beams collision occurs but the concentric cylinders are composed of
>>>>> metal
>>>>> (matter). The subatomic particles that are composed of matter cannot
>>>>> propagate through the detector cylinders without producing a holes
>>>>> in the
>>>>> metallic cylinders and destroying the detector.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It may be of interest you (maybe not) that your understanding of the
>>>> history of particle physics is very limited to the point of being
>>>> wholesale
>>>> wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Muons, mesons, and non-nucleon baryons were initially discovered in
>>>> cosmic
>>>> ray experiments, most notably by using mountaintop and balloon
>>>> detectors,
>>>> and not particle accelerators. Secondly, the detectors used during that
>>>> discovery phase were electroscopes, cloud chambers, spark chambers, and
>>>> photo emulsions, not bubble chambers. The use of bubble chambers at
>>>> particle accelerators only took off after the existence of a lot of
>>>> those
>>>> particles was already firmly established.
>>>>
>>>> A little knowledge is an abettor of foolishness.
>>>>
>>>
>>> an excellent book is "Cosmic Rays" by Leprince-Ringuet, 1950 (orgionally
>>> in french), they show highly advanced could chambers and how to
>>> calculate what the particals are, many examples, excellent book.
>>>
>>
>> Carlo Rossi’s book on Cosmic Rays from the 1960s is even better.
>>
> Sergio, Don't you know that in today's world you ALWAYS have to have the
> "latest version"! That's why Bill is always inside your computer and why
> Newer books are ALWAYS better than older books! Doesn't matter what they
> say.

like science text books, the material hasn't changed in 60 years, but
every year a new book comes out, $230 each. Even 90% of the chapter quiz
questions are the same. And the books loose their sharpness over the
years, become fuzzy muddled as the editors don't know much about the
subject.

Anyhow that 1960 book above is Free!

https://ia802702.us.archive.org/35/items/CosmicRays_281/Rossi-CosmicRays.pdf

        Quiz at 8AM tomorrow.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-07 10:13 -0700
  Particle physics 2 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 10:17 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-08 15:02 -0500
  Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 17:39 +0000
    Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-08 14:58 -0500
      Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 20:43 +0000
        Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 19:13 -0400
          Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-08 18:48 -0500
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-07 12:25 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:38 +0000
    Re: Particle physics 2 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-07 22:44 +0200
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-07 12:26 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-07 12:27 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-07 23:06 +0200
      Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 21:47 +0000
        Re: Particle physics 2 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-08 04:16 +0200
  Re: Particle physics 2 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-07 22:38 +0200
    Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-08 15:07 -0500
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-08 09:57 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 17:48 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-08 10:05 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 17:48 +0000
      Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-08 14:53 -0500
      Re: Particle physics 2 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 12:54 -0700
      Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 18:57 -0400
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-08 12:26 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 20:43 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-08 12:27 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 20:43 +0000
      Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 19:10 -0400
        Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-09 19:03 -0500
          Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 22:50 -0400
            Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-10 21:11 -0500
              Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-11 11:58 -0400
        Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 08:09 -0700
          Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-12 18:05 -0400
            Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 06:48 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 09:30 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 16:43 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 09:31 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 09:36 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 16:46 +0000
      Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-11 14:07 -0500
        Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 19:27 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 09:39 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 16:56 +0000
      Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-11 14:06 -0500
        Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-11 17:24 -0400
        Re: Particle physics 2 poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 22:46 -0700
          Re: Particle physics 2 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 05:31 -0700
            Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-12 09:09 -0500
              Re: Particle physics 2 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 08:31 -0700
              Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-12 17:34 -0400
              Re: Particle physics 2 poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 17:00 -0700
            Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-12 17:15 -0400
              Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 22:06 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 09:43 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 12:27 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 19:53 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 12:32 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 19:59 +0000
    Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-11 17:29 -0400
    Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 08:20 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 12:48 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 20:45 +0000
    Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-11 17:34 -0400
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 12:52 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 08:25 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 12:53 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 08:42 -0700
      Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-12 18:12 -0400
        Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 00:50 +0000
          Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-12 22:29 -0400
            Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 12:21 +0000
              Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-13 11:36 -0400
                Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-13 13:03 -0500
                Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-13 14:38 -0400
        Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 06:50 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 14:33 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 22:30 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 14:36 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 22:31 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 14:39 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 14:52 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 15:05 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 15:07 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 15:55 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-12 00:02 +0000
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 12:27 +0000
      Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-12 09:10 -0500
        Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 14:36 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 17:21 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-12 01:28 +0000
    Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 09:02 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 17:51 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 12:27 +0000
      Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-12 09:16 -0500
        Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 14:36 +0000
          Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-12 09:54 -0500
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 17:55 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-12 01:33 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 18:12 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 18:24 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 18:35 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-12 01:49 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-11 18:36 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-12 01:54 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 09:33 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 10:08 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 09:41 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 17:53 +0000
    Re: Particle physics 2 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-12 17:55 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 10:04 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 10:18 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-12 17:57 +0000
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 18:01 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 10:06 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-12 17:59 +0000
      Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 06:20 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 10:17 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 10:21 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-12 18:05 +0000
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 18:35 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 10:24 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 13:59 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 22:06 +0000
    Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 06:22 -0700
      Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-13 15:48 -0500
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 14:02 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 14:04 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 14:09 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 22:06 +0000
    Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 06:37 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 14:13 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 22:06 +0000
    Re: Particle physics 2 Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-13 01:26 -0400
      Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 08:04 -0500
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 15:39 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 00:50 +0000
      Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-12 22:33 -0400
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 15:45 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 00:50 +0000
      Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-13 15:46 -0500
    Re: Particle physics 2 Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-13 01:31 -0400
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 15:50 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 00:50 +0000
      Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-12 22:36 -0400
        Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 07:28 -0700
          Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-13 11:13 -0400
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 18:14 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 22:15 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-13 01:34 -0400
      Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 08:05 -0500
    Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 07:25 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-13 11:14 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 07:53 -0700
      Re: Particle physics 2 earle Jones <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2018-06-14 11:38 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-13 11:17 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-13 11:20 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 18:40 +0000
      Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-13 15:50 -0500
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-13 11:24 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-13 14:43 -0400
      Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-13 15:52 -0500
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-13 11:25 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 07:57 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-13 12:31 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 20:30 +0000
    Re: Particle physics 2 Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-13 16:42 -0400
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-13 13:55 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 08:06 -0700
      Re: Particle physics 2 Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-14 12:42 -0400
        Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-14 11:52 -0500
          Re: Particle physics 2 Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-14 13:04 -0400
            Re: Particle physics 2 Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-14 13:08 -0400
              Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-14 12:40 -0500
                Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-14 16:01 -0400
              Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 05:39 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-13 13:58 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-13 14:01 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-13 20:41 -0400
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-14 11:15 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-14 11:57 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-14 13:04 -0700

csiph-web