Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #458890
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies |
| Date | 2018-05-22 22:16 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pe24s0$kc7$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <flflukFqhi2U1@mid.individual.net> <dd367aa6-0612-48a2-9a22-8faa985dac21@googlegroups.com> <flm7o5FakcoU1@mid.individual.net> <dcb40b03-0e0d-4606-97b6-e23e24af2579@googlegroups.com> <fmj6crFnep3U1@mid.individual.net> |
Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > Am 15.05.2018 um 21:22 schrieb Edward Prochak: > >>> >>> Bachelor and master degrees were not the way how universities in Belgium >>> in 1920 were organized. >>> >>> I guess they had a system somehow similar to Germany, but actually I >>> don't know. >>> >>> In Germany we had another system, were studies at a university usually >>> ended with a diploma or similar. That took about four or five years. >>> >>> After the end of the regular time you were allowed to postgraduate work, >>> usually as assistant. This takes a couple of years, too, maybe three >>> years. In this time you do some sort of scientific research. About this >>> research you write a thesis. After a few exams and after the thesis was >>> accepted, you receive a degree as 'doctor' (~>PhD). >>> >>> This takes usually about ten years, possibly a little less. >>> >>> But Lemaitre made it in less then two. >>> >>>> Do you also suspect some "Power" involved in this student's >>>> achievements? Or do you only feel the need to denigrate Lamaitre? >>>> Is it jealousy or some other agenda? >>>> >>>> If you are going to criticize a man's career, I only ask >>>> you to be honest about your "intentions". >>> >>> ??? >>> >>> I'm not quite certain want you try to say. I have nothing against >>> Lemaitre's career. I had something against a) his apparently fraudulent >>> title and b) his invention called 'big-bang theory'. >>> >>> TH >> >> So at least you are being honest here, you dislike the BB theory, >> so rather than providing evidence proving it wrong, you prefer >> ad hominem attacks on its discoverer. >> >> That's not science, that's politics. > > (Your forgot religion, since he was actually a priest). > > So what do you have against my argument? > > I wrote, that his 'career' looks like being 'staged'. > > This is something for a scientist. But you are apparently willing to > trust a person about his scientific discovery in a field, were his > academic degree looks dubious? > > How certain could we be, that he made this discovery himself (in person)? > > TH > This is just propaganda. Anyone can rumor-monger and make scurrilous speculations. The desired effect of discrediting usually just bounces back on the propagandist. Give it up. You’re only diminishing yourself here. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-03 19:00 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 11:01 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 18:22 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-04 08:48 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-04 16:25 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 15:28 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-05 05:27 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-05 09:27 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-05 11:59 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-06 10:26 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-06 10:48 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-07 12:18 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:07 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Adam Stefaniak <adam.stefaniak@hotmail.co.uk> - 2018-05-08 00:28 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-08 19:48 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-08 20:40 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Adam Stefaniak <adam.stefaniak@hotmail.co.uk> - 2018-05-08 13:44 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-09 09:23 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Adam Stefaniak <adam.stefaniak@hotmail.co.uk> - 2018-05-09 07:40 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-10 20:15 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Adam Stefaniak <adam.stefaniak@hotmail.co.uk> - 2018-05-10 13:35 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 06:29 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-11 21:03 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-12 00:22 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Otto Wahl <tlow@wtiwor.oc> - 2018-05-12 10:44 +0000
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-12 13:34 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Otto Wahl <tlow@wtiwor.oc> - 2018-05-12 20:23 +0000
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-13 07:09 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 04:21 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-13 09:33 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-13 09:47 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-13 09:55 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 11:03 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 12:50 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-17 12:25 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-17 13:37 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 13:24 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-18 21:01 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 14:02 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-19 12:20 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 04:22 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 04:26 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 12:22 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-22 20:38 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-05-22 12:12 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 22:16 +0000
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 12:42 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-24 18:13 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 14:44 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies "effectuationism@gmail.com" <effectuationism@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 06:44 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 07:08 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies "effectuationism@gmail.com" <effectuationism@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 07:18 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 09:40 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Otto Wahl <tlow@wtiwor.oc> - 2018-05-08 16:47 +0000
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies "effectuationism@gmail.com" <effectuationism@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 10:52 -0700
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies "effectuationism@gmail.com" <effectuationism@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 07:16 -0700
Re:Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-07 19:11 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-07 21:49 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-08 08:25 +0200
Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-25 19:29 +0200
csiph-web