Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #685944
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman |
| Date | 2018-05-17 12:20 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pdkdkb$inf$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (19 earlier) <fls5g3Fjv34U1@mid.individual.net> <pdanka$8j7$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fm3nqmFaabfU3@mid.individual.net> <pdil93$1ij7$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fm476sFdc6gU1@mid.individual.net> |
On 5/16/2018 9:19 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 17/05/2018 11:18 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/16/2018 4:57 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 14/05/2018 11:09 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 5/13/2018 8:01 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 14/05/2018 10:58 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> On 5/13/2018 7:04 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> On 14/05/2018 9:26 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>> On 5/13/2018 5:29 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 14/05/2018 7:39 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 5/13/2018 2:50 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 14/05/2018 5:27 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 May 2018 05:10:15 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/05/2018 4:56 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW: What "problem?" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Are you serious? Since the industrial revolution, humans >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contributed more than 30% more CO2 into the atmosphere of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That extra CO2 has caused the planet to warm. The warming is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causing and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will cause severe problems for our civilisation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you say. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> **Nope. _I_ don't say so at all. Every climatologist >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Many disagree: >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_who_disagree_with_the_scientific_consensus_on_global_warming> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> **You appear to think that what geographers, geologists, >>>>>>>>>>> botanists and >>>>>>>>>>> other scientists, who work in unrelated fields to CLIMATOLOGY >>>>>>>>>>> matter in >>>>>>>>>>> this debate. I have news for you: When I stated CLIMATOLOGISTS, >>>>>>>>>>> that is >>>>>>>>>>> precisely what I meant. ALL the agree that humans have >>>>>>>>>>> caused the observed warming. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> no, not "all" climatologists, you are making stuff up. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> **OK, then, how many climatologists dispute that anthropogenic >>>>>>>>> CO2 is >>>>>>>>> causing the present warming? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> **OK, then, how many climatologists dispute that anthropogenic >>>>>>> CO2 is >>>>>>> causing the present warming? >>>>> >>>>> **OK, then, how many climatologists dispute that anthropogenic CO2 is >>>>> causing the present warming? >>> >>> **OK, then, how many climatologists dispute that anthropogenic CO2 is >>> causing the present warming? >>> >> >> I sent out an email, they will get back with me. > > **Only one? More? How many emails? To whom? > >> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "observed" by satellite ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Show me an error analysis, >>>>>>>>>> what bands of IR are used? >>>>>>>>>> how wide are the filters? >>>>>>>>>> is the actual surface temp measured ? >>>>>>>>>> what emissivity is assumed? >>>>>>>>>> is the air temp within 1000' of the ground measured ? >>>>>>>>>> how much does water vapor affect the accuracy? >>>>>>>>>> what is the accuracy of the sensor platform ? >>>>>>>>>> sunlit vs dark ? >>>>>>>>>> how are clouds screened out of measurements ? >>>>>>>>>> how many types of sensor systems are used ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> and so on....... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> **OK, time for you to do some learning, Mr 0.3%. Here is my >>>>>>>>> reference: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If you REALLY want answers to your questions (and I do not, for >>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>> millisecond believe that you interested in knowledge in the >>>>>>>>> slightest), >>>>>>>>> then read the IPCC reports. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> sure, lets go look at the data >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts.txt >>>>>>>> (monthly averages of varances from what? and from what stations?) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sources: *GHCN-v3* 1880-03/2018 (meteorological stations only) >>>>>>>> using *elimination of outliers* and *homogeneity >>>>>>>> adjustment* >>>>>>>> Notes: 1950 DJF = Dec 1949 - Feb 1950 ; ***** = >>>>>>>> missing >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> => so the data has been manulipulated >>>>>>>> *elimination of outliers* >>>>>>>> *homogeneity adjustment* (the more grievous one) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> look at GHCN-v1 vs. GHCN-v3 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/06/22/comparing-ghcn-v1-and-v3/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "World Meteorological Organization (WMO) to collect all available >>>>>>>> temperature data from member countries. before 1980's these were >>>>>>>> in the >>>>>>>> form of logbooks or other non-digital records." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> =>which means they are NOT accurate to within 1 degree C, and the >>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>> of measurment is questionable, and all earth locations were not >>>>>>>> used, >>>>>>>> and no ocean temps were used. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> **OK, so what did you find in the IPCC documents that support your >>>>>>> insanity? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> whish!!!!!!! right over your head >>>>> >>>>> **OK, so what did you find in the IPCC documents that support your >>>>> insanity? >>> >>> **OK, so what did you find in the IPCC documents that support your >>> insanity? >> >> munged data, tripple averaged, smoothed, points excluded, 99.9% of >> temperature data points missing from the rest of earths surface, no >> error analysis. > > **Let's be more precise, as you expect much more from me. Please issue a > page by page critique of IPCC AR5. Provide supporting cites for my > critique. Unsupported criticisms are unhelpful and smack of very lazy > science. > great idea, when are you going to get it done ? >> >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> here you go, read it for the first time >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sources: *GHCN-v3* 1880-03/2018 (meteorological stations only) >>>>>>>> using *elimination of outliers* and *homogeneity >>>>>>>> adjustment* >>>>>>>> Notes: 1950 DJF = Dec 1949 - Feb 1950 ; ***** = >>>>>>>> missing >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> => so the data has been manulipulated >>>>>>>> *elimination of outliers* >>>>>>>> *homogeneity adjustment* (the more grievous one) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> look at GHCN-v1 vs. GHCN-v3 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/06/22/comparing-ghcn-v1-and-v3/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "World Meteorological Organization (WMO) to collect all available >>>>>>>> temperature data from member countries. before 1980's these were >>>>>>>> in the >>>>>>>> form of logbooks or other non-digital records." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> =>which means they are NOT accurate to within 1 degree C, and the >>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>> of measurment is questionable, and all earth locations were not >>>>>>>> used, >>>>>>>> and no ocean temps were used. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sources: *GHCN-v3* 1880-03/2018 (meteorological stations only) >>>>>>>> using *elimination of outliers* and *homogeneity >>>>>>>> adjustment* >>>>>>>> Notes: 1950 DJF = Dec 1949 - Feb 1950 ; ***** = >>>>>>>> missing >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> => so the data has been manulipulated >>>>>>>> *elimination of outliers* >>>>>>>> *homogeneity adjustment* (the more grievous one) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> look at GHCN-v1 vs. GHCN-v3 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/06/22/comparing-ghcn-v1-and-v3/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "World Meteorological Organization (WMO) to collect all available >>>>>>>> temperature data from member countries. before 1980's these were >>>>>>>> in the >>>>>>>> form of logbooks or other non-digital records." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> =>which means they are NOT accurate to within 1 degree C, and the >>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>> of measurment is questionable, and all earth locations were not >>>>>>>> used, >>>>>>>> and no ocean temps were used. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> **OK, so what did you find in the IPCC documents that support your >>>>> insanity? >>>>> >>>>> **OK, then, how many climatologists dispute that anthropogenic CO2 is >>>>> causing the present warming? >>> >>> **OK, so what did you find in the IPCC documents that support your >>> insanity? >> >> munged data, tripple averaged, smoothed, points excluded, 99.9% of >> temperature data points missing from the rest of earths surface, no >> error analysis. > >**Let's be more precise, as you expect much more from me. Please issue a > page by page critique of IPCC AR5. Provide supporting cites for my > critique. Unsupported criticisms are unhelpful and smack of very lazy > science. > "Unsupported criticisms are unhelpful and smack of very lazy science." so you are one lazy one unhelpful fat troll. > >> >>> **OK, then, how many climatologists dispute that anthropogenic CO2 is >>> causing the present warming? >> >> I sent out email, waiting till they get back with me. > > **Only one? More? How many emails? To whom? > >> >>> >>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> learn how to use google search, dude... >>>> >>>> Scientists questioning the accuracy of IPCC climate projections >>> >>> **CLIMATOLOGISTS, idiot. How many CLIMATOLOGISTS? >>> >>> Sheesh! Learn to read. And learn to read my questions, CAREFULLY! >> >> no need. You can do it yourself, use Google search, or duckduckgo > > **Oh, there is a great need. Again: Read my questions, CAREFULLY. do it yourself, troll. > >
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 18:37 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-11 17:21 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 21:47 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 21:53 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-11 19:17 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 09:32 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 09:39 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 21:30 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-11 18:45 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 22:03 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-12 12:03 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-12 14:47 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-13 07:24 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-12 19:44 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-13 19:08 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:28 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 12:45 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 12:23 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 04:28 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 14:34 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 05:13 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 15:31 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 05:47 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 16:25 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 07:58 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 17:10 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 08:23 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 17:31 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 17:48 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 08:32 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 18:37 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 08:44 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:32 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman "Shobe, Martin" <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-13 20:36 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 11:50 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-14 13:59 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 18:13 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-14 17:18 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 04:26 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 14:30 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 04:35 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 14:56 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 05:10 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 15:27 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-13 12:48 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 06:01 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 12:07 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 17:49 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 05:50 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 16:39 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 08:29 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 18:26 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 16:46 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 20:04 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:18 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 10:47 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 14:37 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 13:58 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 10:04 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 19:58 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 11:01 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 20:09 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 07:57 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 20:18 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 12:19 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-17 12:20 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 21:33 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 17:54 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 08:00 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 12:03 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 12:00 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 09:11 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 11:37 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 09:28 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-14 22:27 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 10:45 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:31 -0700
Politians will take as much money from you as they possibly can. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-15 16:39 -0700
Re: Politians will take as much money from you as they possibly can. Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 09:45 +1000
Re: Politians will take as much money from you as they possibly can. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 19:36 -0700
Re: Politians will take as much money from you as they possibly can. Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 19:50 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 07:45 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 11:21 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 11:10 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-12 11:53 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 10:39 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-12 14:14 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-12 19:09 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 15:38 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 13:48 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 15:44 -0700
csiph-web