Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #685356
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman |
| Date | 2018-05-13 20:09 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pdanka$8j7$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <flrsjfFi8rkU1@mid.individual.net> <pdahir$pa$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fls25dFjb1kU1@mid.individual.net> <pdan02$7n2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fls5g3Fjv34U1@mid.individual.net> |
On 5/13/2018 8:01 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 14/05/2018 10:58 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 5/13/2018 7:04 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 14/05/2018 9:26 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 5/13/2018 5:29 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 14/05/2018 7:39 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/13/2018 2:50 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 14/05/2018 5:27 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 May 2018 05:10:15 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 14/05/2018 4:56 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW: What "problem?"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> **Are you serious? Since the industrial revolution, humans have
>>>>>>>>>>> contributed more than 30% more CO2 into the atmosphere of this
>>>>>>>>>>> planet.
>>>>>>>>>>> That extra CO2 has caused the planet to warm. The warming is
>>>>>>>>>>> causing and
>>>>>>>>>>> will cause severe problems for our civilisation.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So you say.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> **Nope. _I_ don't say so at all. Every climatologist
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Many disagree:
>>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_who_disagree_with_the_scientific_consensus_on_global_warming>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **You appear to think that what geographers, geologists,
>>>>>>> botanists and
>>>>>>> other scientists, who work in unrelated fields to CLIMATOLOGY
>>>>>>> matter in
>>>>>>> this debate. I have news for you: When I stated CLIMATOLOGISTS,
>>>>>>> that is
>>>>>>> precisely what I meant. ALL the agree that humans have
>>>>>>> caused the observed warming.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> no, not "all" climatologists, you are making stuff up.
>>>>>
>>>>> **OK, then, how many climatologists dispute that anthropogenic CO2 is
>>>>> causing the present warming?
>>>
>>>
>>> **OK, then, how many climatologists dispute that anthropogenic CO2 is
>>> causing the present warming?
>
> **OK, then, how many climatologists dispute that anthropogenic CO2 is
> causing the present warming?
>
>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "observed" by satellite ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Show me an error analysis,
>>>>>> what bands of IR are used?
>>>>>> how wide are the filters?
>>>>>> is the actual surface temp measured ?
>>>>>> what emissivity is assumed?
>>>>>> is the air temp within 1000' of the ground measured ?
>>>>>> how much does water vapor affect the accuracy?
>>>>>> what is the accuracy of the sensor platform ?
>>>>>> sunlit vs dark ?
>>>>>> how are clouds screened out of measurements ?
>>>>>> how many types of sensor systems are used ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and so on.......
>>>>>
>>>>> **OK, time for you to do some learning, Mr 0.3%. Here is my reference:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/
>>>>>
>>>>> If you REALLY want answers to your questions (and I do not, for one
>>>>> millisecond believe that you interested in knowledge in the
>>>>> slightest),
>>>>> then read the IPCC reports.
>>>>
>>>> sure, lets go look at the data
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts.txt
>>>> (monthly averages of varances from what? and from what stations?)
>>>>
>>>> Sources: *GHCN-v3* 1880-03/2018 (meteorological stations only)
>>>> using *elimination of outliers* and *homogeneity
>>>> adjustment*
>>>> Notes: 1950 DJF = Dec 1949 - Feb 1950 ; ***** = missing
>>>>
>>>> => so the data has been manulipulated
>>>> *elimination of outliers*
>>>> *homogeneity adjustment* (the more grievous one)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> look at GHCN-v1 vs. GHCN-v3
>>>>
>>>> https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/06/22/comparing-ghcn-v1-and-v3/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "World Meteorological Organization (WMO) to collect all available
>>>> temperature data from member countries. before 1980's these were in the
>>>> form of logbooks or other non-digital records."
>>>>
>>>> =>which means they are NOT accurate to within 1 degree C, and the time
>>>> of measurment is questionable, and all earth locations were not used,
>>>> and no ocean temps were used.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> **OK, so what did you find in the IPCC documents that support your
>>> insanity?
>>>
>>
>> whish!!!!!!! right over your head
>
> **OK, so what did you find in the IPCC documents that support your
> insanity?
>
>
>>
>> here you go, read it for the first time
>>
>>
>> Sources: *GHCN-v3* 1880-03/2018 (meteorological stations only)
>>>> using *elimination of outliers* and *homogeneity
>>>> adjustment*
>>>> Notes: 1950 DJF = Dec 1949 - Feb 1950 ; ***** = missing
>>>>
>>>> => so the data has been manulipulated
>>>> *elimination of outliers*
>>>> *homogeneity adjustment* (the more grievous one)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> look at GHCN-v1 vs. GHCN-v3
>>>>
>>>> https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/06/22/comparing-ghcn-v1-and-v3/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "World Meteorological Organization (WMO) to collect all available
>>>> temperature data from member countries. before 1980's these were in the
>>>> form of logbooks or other non-digital records."
>>>>
>>>> =>which means they are NOT accurate to within 1 degree C, and the time
>>>> of measurment is questionable, and all earth locations were not used,
>>>> and no ocean temps were used.
>>
>>
>> Sources: *GHCN-v3* 1880-03/2018 (meteorological stations only)
>>>> using *elimination of outliers* and *homogeneity
>>>> adjustment*
>>>> Notes: 1950 DJF = Dec 1949 - Feb 1950 ; ***** = missing
>>>>
>>>> => so the data has been manulipulated
>>>> *elimination of outliers*
>>>> *homogeneity adjustment* (the more grievous one)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> look at GHCN-v1 vs. GHCN-v3
>>>>
>>>> https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/06/22/comparing-ghcn-v1-and-v3/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "World Meteorological Organization (WMO) to collect all available
>>>> temperature data from member countries. before 1980's these were in the
>>>> form of logbooks or other non-digital records."
>>>>
>>>> =>which means they are NOT accurate to within 1 degree C, and the time
>>>> of measurment is questionable, and all earth locations were not used,
>>>> and no ocean temps were used.
>
>
> **OK, so what did you find in the IPCC documents that support your
> insanity?
>
> **OK, then, how many climatologists dispute that anthropogenic CO2 is
> causing the present warming?
>
learn how to use google search, dude...
Scientists questioning the accuracy of IPCC climate projections
These scientists have said that it is not possible to project global
climate accurately enough to justify the ranges projected for
temperature and sea-level rise over the 21st century. They may not
conclude specifically that the current IPCC projections are either too
high or too low, but that the projections are likely to be inaccurate
due to inadequacies of current global climate modeling.
David Bellamy, botanist.[19][20][21][22]
Lennart Bengtsson, meteorologist, Reading University.[23][24]
Judith Curry, Professor and former chair of the School of Earth and
Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology.[25][26][27][28]
Freeman Dyson, professor emeritus of the School of Natural Sciences,
Institute for Advanced Study; Fellow of the Royal Society.[29][30]
Ivar Giaever, Norwegian–American physicist and Nobel laureate in
physics (1973).[31]
Steven E. Koonin, theoretical physicist and director of the Center
for Urban Science and Progress at New York University.[32][33]
Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan emeritus professor of atmospheric
science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and member of the
National Academy of Sciences.[30][34][35][36]
Craig Loehle, ecologist and chief scientist at the National Council
for Air and Stream Improvement.[37][38][39][40][41][42][43]
Ross McKitrick, Professor of Economics and CBE Chair in Sustainable
Commerce, University of Guelph.[44][45]
Patrick Moore, former president of Greenpeace Canada.[46][47][48]
Nils-Axel Mörner, retired head of the Paleogeophysics and
Geodynamics Department at Stockholm University, former chairman of the
INQUA Commission on Sea Level Changes and Coastal Evolution
(1999–2003).[49][50]
Garth Paltridge, retired chief research scientist, CSIRO Division of
Atmospheric Research and retired director of the Institute of the
Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, visiting fellow Australian
National University.[51][52]
Roger A. Pielke, Jr., professor of environmental studies at the
Center for Science and Technology Policy Research at the University of
Colorado at Boulder.[53][54]
Denis Rancourt, former professor of physics at University of Ottawa,
research scientist in condensed matter physics, and in environmental and
soil science.[55][56][57][58]
Harrison Schmitt, geologist, Apollo 17 Astronaut, former U.S.
Senator.[59][60]
Peter Stilbs, professor of physical chemistry at Royal Institute of
Technology, Stockholm.[61][62]
Philip Stott, professor emeritus of biogeography at the University
of London.[63][64]
Hendrik Tennekes, retired director of research, Royal Netherlands
Meteorological Institute.[65][66]
Anastasios Tsonis, distinguished professor of atmospheric science at
the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.[67][68]
Fritz Vahrenholt, German politician and energy executive with a
doctorate in chemistry.[69][70]
Scientists arguing that global warming is primarily caused by natural
processes
Graph showing the ability with which a global climate model is able to
reconstruct the historical temperature record, and the degree to which
those temperature changes can be decomposed into various forcing
factors. It shows the effects of five forcing factors: greenhouse gases,
man-made sulfate emissions, solar variability, ozone changes, and
volcanic emissions.[71]
These scientists have said that the observed warming is more likely to
be attributable to natural causes than to human activities. Their views
on climate change are usually described in more detail in their
biographical articles.
Khabibullo Abdusamatov, astrophysicist at Pulkovo Observatory of the
Russian Academy of Sciences.[72][73]
Sallie Baliunas, retired astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center
for Astrophysics.[74][75][76]
Timothy Ball, historical climatologist, and retired professor of
geography at the University of Winnipeg.[77][78][79]
Ian Clark, hydrogeologist, professor, Department of Earth Sciences,
University of Ottawa.[80][81]
Vincent Courtillot, geophysicist, member of the French Academy of
Sciences.[82]
Doug Edmeades, PhD., soil scientist, Officer of the New Zealand
Order of Merit.[83]
Chris de Freitas, associate professor, School of Geography, Geology
and Environmental Science, University of Auckland.[84][85]
David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, Department of
Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester.[86][87]
Don Easterbrook, emeritus professor of geology, Western Washington
University.[88][89]
William Happer, physicist specializing in optics and spectroscopy;
emeritus professor, Princeton University.[30][90]
Ole Humlum, professor of geology at the University of Oslo.[91][92]
Wibjörn Karlén, professor emeritus of geography and geology at the
University of Stockholm.[93][94]
William Kininmonth, meteorologist, former Australian delegate to
World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology.[95][96]
David Legates, associate professor of geography and director of the
Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware.[97][98]
Anthony Lupo, professor of atmospheric science at the University of
Missouri.[99][100]
Tad Murty, oceanographer; adjunct professor, Departments of Civil
Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa.[101][102]
Tim Patterson, paleoclimatologist and professor of geology at
Carleton University in Canada.[103][104]
Ian Plimer, professor emeritus of mining geology, the University of
Adelaide.[105][106]
Arthur B. Robinson, American politician, biochemist and former
faculty member at the University of California, San Diego.[107][108]
Murry Salby, atmospheric scientist, former professor at Macquarie
University and University of Colorado.[109][110]
Nicola Scafetta, research scientist in the physics department at
Duke University.[111][112][113]
Tom Segalstad, geologist; associate professor at University of
Oslo.[114][115]
Nir Shaviv, professor of physics focusing on astrophysics and
climate science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.[116][117]
Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the
University of Virginia.[118][119][120][121]
Willie Soon, astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for
Astrophysics.[122][123]
Roy Spencer, meteorologist; principal research scientist, University
of Alabama in Huntsville.[124][125]
Henrik Svensmark, physicist, Danish National Space Center.[126][127]
George H. Taylor, retired director of the Oregon Climate Service at
Oregon State University.[128][129]
Jan Veizer, environmental geochemist, professor emeritus from
University of Ottawa.[130][131]
Scientists arguing that the cause of global warming is unknown
These scientists have said that no principal cause can be ascribed to
the observed rising temperatures, whether man-made or natural.
Syun-Ichi Akasofu, retired professor of geophysics and founding
director of the International Arctic Research Center of the University
of Alaska Fairbanks.[132][133]
Claude Allègre, French politician; geochemist, emeritus professor at
Institute of Geophysics (Paris).[134][135]
Robert Balling, a professor of geography at Arizona State
University.[136][137]
Pål Brekke, solar astrophycisist, senior advisor Norwegian Space
Centre.[138][139]
John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the
Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville,
contributor to several IPCC reports.[140][141][142]
Petr Chylek, space and remote sensing sciences researcher, Los
Alamos National Laboratory.[143][144]
David Deming, geology professor at the University of Oklahoma.[145][146]
Deceased scientists
These scientists have published material indicating their opposition to
the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming prior to their
deaths.
August H. "Augie" Auer Jr. (1940–2007), retired New Zealand
MetService meteorologist and past professor of atmospheric science at
the University of Wyoming.[167][168]
Reid Bryson (1920–2008), emeritus professor of atmospheric and
oceanic sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison.[169][170]
Robert M. Carter (1942–2016), former head of the School of Earth
Sciences at James Cook University.[171][172]
William M. Gray (1929–2016), professor emeritus and head of the
Tropical Meteorology Project, Department of Atmospheric Science,
Colorado State University.[173][174]
Yuri Izrael (1930-2014), former Chairman, Committee for
Hydrometeorology (USSR); former Director, Institute of Global Climate
and Ecology (Russian Academy of Science); Vice-Chairman of IPCC,
2001-2007.[175][176][177]
Robert Jastrow (1925–2008), American astronomer, physicist,
cosmologist and leading NASA scientist who, together with Fred Seitz and
William Nierenberg, established the George C. Marshall
Institute.[178][179][180]
Harold ("Hal") Warren Lewis (1923–2011), emeritus professor of
physics and former department chairman at the University of California,
Santa Barbara.[181][182]
Frederick Seitz (1911–2008), solid-state physicist, former president
of the National Academy of Sciences and co-founder of the George C.
Marshall Institute in 1984.[183][184][185]
Stanley B. Goldenberg a meteorologist with NOAA/AOML's Hurricane
Research Division.[147][148]
Vincent R. Gray, New Zealand physical chemist with expertise in coal
ashes.[149][150]
Keith E. Idso, botanist, former adjunct professor of biology at
Maricopa County Community College District and the vice president of the
Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change.[151][152]
Kary Mullis, 1993 Nobel Laureate in Chemistry, inventor of the
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method.[153][154][155]
Antonino Zichichi, emeritus professor of nuclear physics at the
University of Bologna and president of the World Federation of
Scientists.[156][157]
Scientists arguing that global warming will have few negative consequences
These scientists have said that projected rising temperatures will be of
little impact or a net positive for society or the environment.
Indur M. Goklany, science and technology policy analyst for the
United States Department of the Interior.[158][159][160]
Craig D. Idso, faculty researcher, Office of Climatology, Arizona
State University and founder of the Center for the Study of Carbon
Dioxide and Global Change.[161][162]
Sherwood B. Idso, former research physicist, USDA Water Conservation
Laboratory, and adjunct professor, Arizona State University.[163][164]
Patrick Michaels, senior fellow at the Cato Institute and retired
research professor of environmental science at the University of
Virginia.[165][166]
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 18:37 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-11 17:21 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 21:47 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 21:53 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-11 19:17 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 09:32 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 09:39 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 21:30 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-11 18:45 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 22:03 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-12 12:03 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-12 14:47 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-13 07:24 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-12 19:44 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-13 19:08 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:28 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 12:45 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 12:23 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 04:28 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 14:34 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 05:13 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 15:31 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 05:47 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 16:25 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 07:58 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 17:10 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 08:23 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 17:31 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 17:48 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 08:32 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 18:37 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 08:44 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:32 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman "Shobe, Martin" <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-13 20:36 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 11:50 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-14 13:59 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 18:13 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-14 17:18 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 04:26 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 14:30 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 04:35 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 14:56 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 05:10 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 15:27 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-13 12:48 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 06:01 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 12:07 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 17:49 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 05:50 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 16:39 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 08:29 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 18:26 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 16:46 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 20:04 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:18 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 10:47 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 14:37 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 13:58 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 10:04 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 19:58 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 11:01 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 20:09 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 07:57 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 20:18 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 12:19 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-17 12:20 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 21:33 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 17:54 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 08:00 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 12:03 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 12:00 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 09:11 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 11:37 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 09:28 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-14 22:27 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 10:45 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:31 -0700
Politians will take as much money from you as they possibly can. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-15 16:39 -0700
Re: Politians will take as much money from you as they possibly can. Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 09:45 +1000
Re: Politians will take as much money from you as they possibly can. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 19:36 -0700
Re: Politians will take as much money from you as they possibly can. Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 19:50 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 07:45 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 11:21 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 11:10 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-12 11:53 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 10:39 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-12 14:14 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-12 19:09 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 15:38 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 13:48 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 15:44 -0700
csiph-web