Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #458047
| From | Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Instantaneous light proved |
| Date | 2018-05-16 09:13 +0000 |
| Organization | Clotilde Ros Institute |
| Message-ID | <pdgsni$4qq$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <Ns2dnXQmrZBBZ2fHnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <24413af0-5681-4c8d-97fb-4bb86edf9bfe@googlegroups.com> <pdfcmg$6cd$5@gioia.aioe.org> <ub6dnV4uUpDVAWbHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com> <pdgsgo$4qq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Ursula Vankeuren wrote: > Tom Roberts wrote: > >> On 5/15/18 2:33 PM, Ursula Vankeuren wrote: >>> a correlation reveals causation. That's the whole idea in setting up a >>> correlation. To reveal, or not, the causation. >> >> Not really. Sometimes correlation does reveal a cause, but of course >> one needs other information to determine which way the causation goes. >> There are zillions of examples of correlations which do not imply >> causation at all. For instance: >> http://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations >> Tom Roberts > > Pardonemoise, but the time τ, or the space q, span is essential. Plus > those sets of data has to relates somehow, directly or indirectly. Or > else everything correlates with everything else, and itself. However, > auto- correlation reveals a lot of other interesting things, I'm not > going into details. Forgot to mention, those revelation has always a cause. Not obvious directly, but nevertheless.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-14 15:09 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 15:21 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-14 16:18 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-14 16:34 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-14 16:39 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-14 17:33 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-14 17:54 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-14 18:29 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-14 17:36 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-14 17:47 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-14 18:39 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-15 12:29 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-15 14:41 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-18 09:33 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-18 09:57 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-18 17:35 +0000
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-18 11:02 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-15 10:26 -0500
Re: Instantaneous light proved Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-15 19:21 +0000
Re: Instantaneous light proved Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-15 10:21 -0500
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-15 12:23 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-15 19:33 +0000
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-15 13:26 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-15 21:49 -0500
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-15 20:47 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-15 20:56 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-15 20:59 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-15 21:23 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-16 17:14 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-16 17:30 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-16 09:09 +0000
Re: Instantaneous light proved Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-16 09:13 +0000
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-16 17:33 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-15 21:34 -0500
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-18 09:22 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 15:53 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-17 17:37 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-17 18:15 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-24 18:40 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-18 09:28 -0700
csiph-web