Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #458046
| From | Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Instantaneous light proved |
| Date | 2018-05-16 09:09 +0000 |
| Organization | Clotilde Ros Institute |
| Message-ID | <pdgsgo$4qq$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <fb5d3f12-25aa-44dc-ad50-5117f98a66b4@googlegroups.com> <Ns2dnXQmrZBBZ2fHnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <24413af0-5681-4c8d-97fb-4bb86edf9bfe@googlegroups.com> <pdfcmg$6cd$5@gioia.aioe.org> <ub6dnV4uUpDVAWbHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com> |
Tom Roberts wrote: > On 5/15/18 2:33 PM, Ursula Vankeuren wrote: >> a correlation reveals causation. That's the whole idea in setting up a >> correlation. To reveal, or not, the causation. > > Not really. Sometimes correlation does reveal a cause, but of course one > needs other information to determine which way the causation goes. > There are zillions of examples of correlations which do not imply > causation at all. For instance: > http://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations > Tom Roberts Pardonemoise, but the time τ, or the space q, span is essential. Plus those sets of data has to relates somehow, directly or indirectly. Or else everything correlates with everything else, and itself. However, auto- correlation reveals a lot of other interesting things, I'm not going into details.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-14 15:09 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 15:21 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-14 16:18 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-14 16:34 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-14 16:39 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-14 17:33 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-14 17:54 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-14 18:29 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-14 17:36 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-14 17:47 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-14 18:39 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-15 12:29 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-15 14:41 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-18 09:33 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-18 09:57 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-18 17:35 +0000
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-18 11:02 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-15 10:26 -0500
Re: Instantaneous light proved Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-15 19:21 +0000
Re: Instantaneous light proved Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-15 10:21 -0500
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-15 12:23 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-15 19:33 +0000
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-15 13:26 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-15 21:49 -0500
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-15 20:47 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-15 20:56 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-15 20:59 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-15 21:23 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-16 17:14 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-16 17:30 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-16 09:09 +0000
Re: Instantaneous light proved Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-16 09:13 +0000
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-16 17:33 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-15 21:34 -0500
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-18 09:22 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 15:53 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-17 17:37 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-17 18:15 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-24 18:40 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved alsor@interia.pl - 2018-05-18 09:28 -0700
csiph-web