Re: The Head of the U.S. Coast Guard Isn't Afraid to Talk About Climate Change

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate
Subject	Re: The Head of the U.S. Coast Guard Isn't Afraid to Talk About Climate Change
Date	2018-05-07 00:21 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<pconou$12fd$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<pcmimd$1s2d$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pcn2mg$li7$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fl95cnFd12eU1@mid.individual.net> <pcnoc1$1pjq$2@gioia.aioe.org> <fl9jhdFfu7nU1@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/6/2018 7:04 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 7/05/2018 6:25 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 5/6/2018 3:03 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 7/05/2018 12:15 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 5/6/2018 4:42 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> Even as other government agencies have quietly banished references to
>>>>> climate change, the head of the U.S. Coast Guard does not shy away
>>>>> from
>>>>> the subject that the White House has made practically taboo:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/04/the-head-of-the-u-s-coast-guard-isnt-afraid-to-talk-about-climate-change/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> yep, by golly, that 0.1 mm/year sea rise,
>>>
>>> **Try an OBSERVED (not predicted, nor modelled) rate of 2.8 ~ 3.6mm PA.
>>> With the increased melt from Greenland, that rate is expected to
>>> increase.
>>>
>>
>> OOOOOOOOOOOOOhhh  MMMYY  !!
>>
>> the Coastguard ships cannot withstand 1/10 of an inch of rise in water
>> level !!!
> 
> **Here is YOUR claim:
> 
> "yep, by golly, that 0.1 mm/year sea rise, computer predicted by some
> aggressive global worming computer modeling problems on closed data, has
> worried the shit out of some unemployed contract journalists on how they
> can make money off it."
> 
> 
> Do you now admit your lie?
> 
>>
>>>
>>>   computer predicted by some
>>>> aggressive global worming computer modeling problems on closed data,
>>>
>>> **Well, given your data is hopelessly wrong, we can safely disregard
>>> your lies.
>>>
>>>
>>>   has
>>>> worried the shit out of some unemployed contract journalists on how
>>>> they
>>>> can make money off it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> **How about you supply real data?
>>
>> no need, the article is FAKE NEWS on its face.
>>
> 
> **How about your lies? When will you take responsibility for them? Here,
> again, are your lies:
> 
> "yep, by golly, that 0.1 mm/year sea rise, computer predicted by some
> aggressive global worming computer modeling problems on closed data, has
> worried the shit out of some unemployed contract journalists on how they
> can make money off it."
> 
> Here's your chance to admit your lies and apologise, once and for all.
> Do it now, or will you dig yourself an even deeper hole?
> 

the article is a lie.       the article... is... a  lie.

  The Article is  a => *total Lie*.


weather is not glowball Worming,

    weather is not "climate change"

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

csiph-web