Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #511623
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: nano-M-sets |
| Date | 2015-08-06 18:39 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.08.06.18.39.39@localhost.localdomain> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <f3688246-1966-416d-8630-ba49703a40f6@googlegroups.com> <pan.2015.08.05.21.22.35@localhost.localdomain> <mpuu0u$hbv$1@dont-email.me> <pan.2015.08.06.17.34.50@localhost.localdomain> <839d4582-d0c6-48b3-9cbd-4b1258ef4c73@googlegroups.com> |
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:23:51 -0700, Quadibloc wrote: > > science does show there are differences between men and women. > A formalized science is not really necessary. "Anatomy is destiny," as the saying goes. Women are designed for one thing only and that is bear and nurture children. No matter how much they attempt to override this fundamental instinct it will wiggle out in some way. Even the hard-core female CEO still dotes over her little pet poodle (substitute child) that she would never forsake. But the science of psychoanalysis has elucidated quite well the psychodynamics of a feminist, or anti-women. These bitches are mentally disturbed to a high degree and cannot be trusted in any kind of social context. Men, on the other hand, are creatures of aggression and war. Science is derived from war and consequently science is the natural domain for men and men only. All men who disagree are brainwashed, emasculated idiots.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-08-04 20:41 -0700
Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 05:14 +0000
Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-08-05 04:38 -0700
Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 14:22 +0000
nano-M-sets noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 13:14 -0700
Re: nano-M-sets Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 21:23 +0000
Re: nano-M-sets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 08:16 +0200
Re: nano-M-sets Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-06 17:34 +0000
Re: nano-M-sets Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-08-06 11:23 -0700
Re: nano-M-sets Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-06 18:39 +0000
Re: nano-M-sets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 21:07 +0200
Re: nano-M-sets Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-06 19:14 +0000
Re: nano-M-sets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 07:41 +0200
Re: nano-M-sets Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-08-06 14:17 -0700
Re: nano-M-sets Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-06 21:36 +0000
Re: nano-M-sets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 08:08 +0200
Re: nano-M-sets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 21:05 +0200
Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-08-06 11:18 -0700
Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-06 19:03 +0000
Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-08-06 14:11 -0700
Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-06 21:51 +0000
Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-08-06 15:18 -0700
Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-07 01:11 +0000
Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 10:25 -0700
Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-08-07 11:41 -0700
Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-07 16:21 -0700
Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Timo <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> - 2015-08-05 04:47 -0700
Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 14:36 +0200
csiph-web