Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #511524

Re: nano-M-sets

From Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: nano-M-sets
Date 2015-08-06 08:16 +0200
Organization Good company
Message-ID <mpuu0u$hbv$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <pan.2015.08.05.05.14.04@localhost.localdomain> <b7826428-7fa3-495b-b9a0-ccecb131160b@googlegroups.com> <pan.2015.08.05.14.22.47@localhost.localdomain> <f3688246-1966-416d-8630-ba49703a40f6@googlegroups.com> <pan.2015.08.05.21.22.35@localhost.localdomain>

Show all headers | View raw


Dne 05/08/2015 v 23:23 Fabian Russell napsal(a):
> On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:14:24 -0700, noTthaTguY wrote:
> 
>> also, IEEE-758, -8-something,
>>
> 
> That's IEEE-754 2008 revision.
> 
> This is probably one of the most significant standards in
> the technical world.  Everyone should have a copy on his,
> not her, bookshelf.  (Women belong in the kitchen and not
> the laboratory.)

Prejudices are seldom attributes of a good scientist.
There is a good list of experimental observations
refuting the idea above.

> 
> But I think that OP is just another brain-dead dilettante.
> He's chasing after the "fool's gold" of precision when precision
> itself is quite meaningless.

Putting down the others does not make one smarter,
it only reveals he is not as smart as he would like to pretend.

Yes, precision itself is meaningless,
but sometimes it is very handy.
> 
> For every computation, bar none, we need to understand thoroughly
> the stability and conditioning of the algorithm utilized.
> 
Not only just algorithms,
but also of equations the algorithms try to solve
and of experimental data used for that.

As algorithms may have the best stability and conditioning
from all three of them, like in numerical weather prediction.

-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-08-04 20:41 -0700
  Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 05:14 +0000
    Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-08-05 04:38 -0700
      Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 14:22 +0000
        nano-M-sets noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 13:14 -0700
          Re: nano-M-sets Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-05 21:23 +0000
            Re: nano-M-sets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 08:16 +0200
              Re: nano-M-sets Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-06 17:34 +0000
                Re: nano-M-sets Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-08-06 11:23 -0700
                Re: nano-M-sets Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-06 18:39 +0000
                Re: nano-M-sets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 21:07 +0200
                Re: nano-M-sets Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-06 19:14 +0000
                Re: nano-M-sets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 07:41 +0200
                Re: nano-M-sets Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-08-06 14:17 -0700
                Re: nano-M-sets Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-06 21:36 +0000
                Re: nano-M-sets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 08:08 +0200
                Re: nano-M-sets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 21:05 +0200
        Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-08-06 11:18 -0700
          Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-06 19:03 +0000
            Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-08-06 14:11 -0700
              Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-06 21:51 +0000
                Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-08-06 15:18 -0700
                Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-07 01:11 +0000
                Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 10:25 -0700
                Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-08-07 11:41 -0700
                Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-07 16:21 -0700
  Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Timo <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> - 2015-08-05 04:47 -0700
    Re: What Floating-Point Precisions Would Physicists Prefer? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 14:36 +0200

csiph-web