Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/shrinker: make unregister_shrinker() less fragile

From	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/shrinker: make unregister_shrinker() less fragile
Date	2015-07-13 08:40 +0200
Message-ID	<pLFzb-1F6-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pKWC6-8du-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <pKZTj-1Tn-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <pLfv3-2G0-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 11:47:32AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Yes, but the main difference here is that it seems that shrinker users
> don't tend to treat shrinker registration failures as fatal errors and
> just continue with shrinker functionality disabled. And it makes sense.
> 
> (copy paste from https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/9/751)
> 

I hearily disagree.  It's not any less critical than other failures.

The right way forward is to handle register failure properly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Thread

Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/shrinker: make unregister_shrinker() less fragile Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2015-07-11 12:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/shrinker: make unregister_shrinker() less fragile Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2015-07-13 08:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/shrinker: make unregister_shrinker() less fragile Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 09:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/shrinker: make unregister_shrinker() less fragile Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2015-07-13 11:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/shrinker: make unregister_shrinker() less fragile Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 11:40 +0200

csiph-web