Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1182646
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/shrinker: make unregister_shrinker() less fragile |
| Date | 2015-07-13 11:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pLInq-3kU-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <pKZTj-1Tn-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <pLfv3-2G0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pLFzb-1F6-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pLFSy-1Lw-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pLHUn-3aG-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On (07/13/15 02:03), Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 03:52:53PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > Why? In some sense, shrinker callbacks are just a way to be nice. > > No one writes a driver just to be able to handle shrinker calls. An > > ability to react to those calls is just additional option; it does > > not directly affect or limit driver's functionality (at least, it > > really should not). > > No, they are not just nice. They are a fundamental part of memory > management and required to reclaim (often large) amounts of memory. Yes. 'Nice' used in a sense that drivers have logic to release the memory anyway; mm asks volunteers (the drivers that have registered shrinker callbacks) to release some spare/wasted/etc. when things are getting tough (the drivers are not aware of that in general). This is surely important to mm, not to the driver though -- it just agrees to be 'nice', but even not expected to release any memory at all (IOW, this is not a contract). -ss -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/shrinker: make unregister_shrinker() less fragile Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2015-07-11 12:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/shrinker: make unregister_shrinker() less fragile Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2015-07-13 08:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/shrinker: make unregister_shrinker() less fragile Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 09:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/shrinker: make unregister_shrinker() less fragile Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2015-07-13 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/shrinker: make unregister_shrinker() less fragile Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 11:40 +0200
csiph-web