Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #27728

Re: forth implementation for linux x64

From "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: forth implementation for linux x64
Date 2014-01-08 04:41 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <op.w9c3uouz5zc71u@localhost> (permalink)
References <af49bccd-e956-47e4-bfad-221f0c7d6522@googlegroups.com> <52cbff0d$0$9236$e4fe514c@dreader35.news.xs4all.nl>

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, 07 Jan 2014 08:20:13 -0500, Albert van der Horst  
<albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> wrote:
> In article <af49bccd-e956-47e4-bfad-221f0c7d6522@googlegroups.com>,
> Arkady Rost  <arkrost@gmail.com> wrote:

>> I'm really impressed by forth and looking forward to dive in
>> programming with it. Suggest me please the most fresh and usable
>> forth implementation for linux x64 platform.
>
> You shouldn't ask for fresh programs. They are [not] groceries.
>
> Instead you should ask for programs that are so good and stable
> that there have been no changes for years, because
> there are no improvements possible and no defects found.
>

I agree, but don't conflate "good" and "stable" with no bugs.

A couple of quotes of mine from 2007:

"A couple other problems are that the code might not be under your control
and that the code may still be active.  When it comes to code written by
others, I tend to prefer code that is well tested (few bugs) and dead (no
new bugs)."

"[that project] appears to be a dead project so the code is guaranteed to
be stable, i.e., no further new bugs by hyperactive developers..."

Of course, I think that implies you also indicated your preference
for a dead Forth too, since an active or an alive Forth won't be stable.


Rod Pemberton

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

forth implementation for linux x64 Arkady Rost <arkrost@gmail.com> - 2014-01-06 16:55 -0800
  Re: forth implementation for linux x64 Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-01-07 03:31 +0100
    Re: forth implementation for linux x64 Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2014-01-07 07:58 +0000
  Re: forth implementation for linux x64 albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-01-07 13:20 +0000
    Re: forth implementation for linux x64 Arkady Rost <arkrost@gmail.com> - 2014-01-07 09:51 -0800
    Re: forth implementation for linux x64 "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-01-08 04:41 -0500

csiph-web