Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #27728
| From | "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: forth implementation for linux x64 |
| Date | 2014-01-08 04:41 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <op.w9c3uouz5zc71u@localhost> (permalink) |
| References | <af49bccd-e956-47e4-bfad-221f0c7d6522@googlegroups.com> <52cbff0d$0$9236$e4fe514c@dreader35.news.xs4all.nl> |
On Tue, 07 Jan 2014 08:20:13 -0500, Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> wrote: > In article <af49bccd-e956-47e4-bfad-221f0c7d6522@googlegroups.com>, > Arkady Rost <arkrost@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm really impressed by forth and looking forward to dive in >> programming with it. Suggest me please the most fresh and usable >> forth implementation for linux x64 platform. > > You shouldn't ask for fresh programs. They are [not] groceries. > > Instead you should ask for programs that are so good and stable > that there have been no changes for years, because > there are no improvements possible and no defects found. > I agree, but don't conflate "good" and "stable" with no bugs. A couple of quotes of mine from 2007: "A couple other problems are that the code might not be under your control and that the code may still be active. When it comes to code written by others, I tend to prefer code that is well tested (few bugs) and dead (no new bugs)." "[that project] appears to be a dead project so the code is guaranteed to be stable, i.e., no further new bugs by hyperactive developers..." Of course, I think that implies you also indicated your preference for a dead Forth too, since an active or an alive Forth won't be stable. Rod Pemberton
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
forth implementation for linux x64 Arkady Rost <arkrost@gmail.com> - 2014-01-06 16:55 -0800
Re: forth implementation for linux x64 Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-01-07 03:31 +0100
Re: forth implementation for linux x64 Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2014-01-07 07:58 +0000
Re: forth implementation for linux x64 albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-01-07 13:20 +0000
Re: forth implementation for linux x64 Arkady Rost <arkrost@gmail.com> - 2014-01-07 09:51 -0800
Re: forth implementation for linux x64 "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-01-08 04:41 -0500
csiph-web