Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.global-warming > #781855
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.global-warming, sci.environment, aus.general, aus.politics |
| Subject | Re: a small but significant win |
| Date | 2026-10-15 08:11 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.3w7bt6fubyq249@pvr2.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <op.3w53o6ybbyq249@pvr2.lan> <11anavu$1m7j$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <prduclpio9e1fkk9lv7qffcn1vfbqla5v3@4ax.com> <op.3w6xrv0gbyq249@pvr2.lan> <gtpvcldd7pch92hd3j9gotj2h3nqi2ktvf@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote > Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote >>> <https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/tik-tok-linked-to-controversial-mosque-posted-video-of-multiple-ballots-backing-labor-mp/news-story/bff839a43e73de24aa2df4f92e05697a> >>> https://tinyurl.com/2wsahp9h >>> TikTok linked to controversial mosque posted video of multiple ballots >>> backing Labor MP >> Not ballot papers, HOW TO VOTES >>> A TikTok account linked to a mosque – which was handed a $670,000 >>> taxpayer-funded grant by Labor MP Julian Hill before last year’s >>> federal election – posted a video from within a voting centre of >>> multiple ballot papers backing Mr Hill a week before polling day. >> So can't be ballot papers, JUST how to votes >>> sample/image copied from paper >>> https://ibb.co/LXDRnVpR >> Those are HOW TO VOTES > You still feeding on BS You are the one feeding on murdoch shit rag bullshit and lies > https://share.google/aimode/39pCTtSJFS230fmma > No, these are official, legal ballot papers Have fun explaining how they can be official, legal ballot papers a week before polling day available for a journo to take a photo of > rather than political "How-to-Vote" cards. > You can confidently identify these as real Australian Electoral > Commission (AEC) ballot papers due to several explicit design features > visible in the image: If that is accurate, most likely they were photographed by someone when the ballots were counted by someone involved in the counting or the scrutineering AFTER the polling stations had closed And its a lie that the handwriting is identical given that all there is on them is NUMBERS and even if the numbering was done by one individual, all that proves is that someone filled out those ballots for individuals who could not read english, maybe with postal ballots
Back to alt.global-warming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-07 03:19 +0000
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-12 12:57 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 09:23 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 09:50 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 13:51 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 09:46 -0600
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 09:41 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Jeremiah Jones <jj@j.j> - 2026-10-13 21:19 -0700
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 16:02 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:11 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:42 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 16:18 +1100
Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 07:29 +0000
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:38 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 03:08 +1100
Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 17:02 +0000
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:35 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 14:48 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 15:56 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 16:02 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:36 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:04 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:01 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:41 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-16 20:38 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:39 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 11:03 -0600
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:32 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 07:38 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:42 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:24 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:10 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:44 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 05:43 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 13:00 -0600
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:48 +1100
Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-16 03:06 +0000
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:38 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:11 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:26 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:42 -0600
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:15 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-14 20:34 +1100
Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 09:54 +0000
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:01 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-15 22:09 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 07:52 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-15 23:49 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 03:25 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:10 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:00 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:15 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:45 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:51 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 08:06 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 08:34 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 09:31 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 11:07 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 14:32 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 15:39 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 16:03 +1100
Re: a small but significant win 000-666 <8-0-15@never.invalid> - 2026-10-14 21:49 +0000
csiph-web