Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #643615

Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff
Date 2017-07-31 10:16 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <olnhkh$15ki$7@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <d69e12ce-103f-4f02-9914-a44c7e77d492@googlegroups.com> <oln4v5$hnn$4@gioia.aioe.org> <3f19a021-502a-4fb2-8ce2-d6b42aae653f@googlegroups.com> <oln8fa$o8m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <65524f05-fd3a-43b7-a4ab-cc48df42adf6@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 7/31/17 7:45 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 10:40:15 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 9:40:25 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Every atom is surrounded by one or more electrons.
>>>>> So unless joined by valency etc. every atom should repel every other atom.
>>>>> But this does not happen. In any solid of any element, the atoms are happy to
>>>>> stick together.
>>>>
>>>> And you obviously have no idea why.  Never educated about fermions I guess.
>>>
>>> When one holds that modern physicists cannot be trusted as they have bungled
>>> with e=mcc and quantum, who wants to be educated about fermions, quarks,
>>> black holes, big bang, etc. They are on the same level as fairies, unicorns,
>>> goblins, gnomes, etc. in the imaginary sense but much less satisfying
>>> psychologically.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Arindam Banerjee
>>
>> You are happy then to lift up a straw man that metals and other solids are
>> a mystery not understood by physicists, because you see no point in
>> studying the explanations they claim to have.
> 
>  From what I have read of your posts, they can be safely ignored, for I do not
> give you any credibility whatsoever. You are blind to reason, and I am sure
> they are too. Anyone who believe in the invariance of the speed of light has
> to be a criminal.
>>
>> Arindam says: "What they claim is obviously false, and so they must be in
>> fact puzzled by why solids do not blow apart, as their simple ideas must
>> suggest, and so I will solve their problem by showing them how solids can
>> be."
>>
>> Have I got all that right?
> 
> It is impossible to debate with you and other e=mcc types for you all are
> completely wrong in every way.
> So I will try to make my points clear to the world that is still honest.

Uh-huh. So when a criticism lands in your general vicinity, your 
response is to call them dishonest and criminal and declare them to be 
without credibility and to shut off the conversation.

I see.

You are SO in the wrong field if you cannot defend your thinking against 
criticism, or worse, acknowledge obvious mistakes.

>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Now why should they, as they all have outer electrons creating negative
>>>>> charges for repulsion?
>>>>> They should all be apart!
>>>>> The answer I gave this morning. It is about the electron acting as a cloud
>>>>> around the nucleus, and this cloud can stretch.
>>>>> When it stretches, the atom becomes a dipole with the nucleus with protons on
>>>>> one side and give a positive field and the electrons dense on the other side
>>>>> giving a negative field.
>>>>> Thus the positive side of an atom attracts the negative side of the other atom
>>>>> Depending upon how strongly this is done, the material is strong.
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay so far?
>>>>>
>>>>> Now the stunning thing, if the above is accepted, is that the electrons in
>>>>> general and an electron in particular is acting as a flexible RUBBER BAND.
>>>>>
>>>>> This picture of the electron as a rubber band is going to be useful when I
>>>>> start a topic about how the hydrogen bomb works.
>>>>>
>>>>> The way the hydrogen bomb works is crucial to our understanding how the
>>>>> uranium bomb works.
>>>>>
>>>>> You may think that I am going the other way around as the a bomb came before
>>>>> the h bomb.  Also, how the hell can I explain something which no one ever
>>>>> understood.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, the glorious simplicity of all will be evident, for it results from the
>>>>> mind of
>>>>>
>>>>> Arindam (bin Einstein ban Gandi) Banerjee, greatest genius of all time, sole
>>>>> god among lotsa devils.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 


-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 20:49 -0700
  Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-27 20:57 -0700
    Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 23:16 -0700
      Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-28 02:20 -0700
  Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 01:04 -0700
    Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 03:20 -0700
  Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-28 16:43 +0000
    Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 10:32 -0700
      Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-29 22:35 -0700
        Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 14:21 -0700
          Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-30 21:53 -0700
    Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 07:51 -0700
      Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-30 21:45 -0700
      Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-31 18:41 +0000
      Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:18 -0500
        Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 13:37 -0700
          Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 10:27 -0500
  On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 07:54 -0700
    On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 08:26 -0700
    Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 12:37 +0000
    Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 09:11 -0700
  Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 11:40 +0000
    Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 05:03 -0700
      Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 12:40 +0000
        Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 05:45 -0700
          Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 06:39 -0700
            Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 11:56 -0700
              Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 14:27 -0700
                Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 09:10 -0700
          Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 10:16 -0500

csiph-web