Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #643589

Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff
Date 2017-07-31 12:40 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <oln8fa$o8m$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <d69e12ce-103f-4f02-9914-a44c7e77d492@googlegroups.com> <oln4v5$hnn$4@gioia.aioe.org> <3f19a021-502a-4fb2-8ce2-d6b42aae653f@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 9:40:25 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Every atom is surrounded by one or more electrons.
>>> So unless joined by valency etc. every atom should repel every other atom.
>>> But this does not happen. In any solid of any element, the atoms are happy to 
>>> stick together.
>> 
>> And you obviously have no idea why.  Never educated about fermions I guess.
> 
> When one holds that modern physicists cannot be trusted as they have bungled
> with e=mcc and quantum, who wants to be educated about fermions, quarks,
> black holes, big bang, etc. They are on the same level as fairies, unicorns,
> goblins, gnomes, etc. in the imaginary sense but much less satisfying 
> psychologically.
> 
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee

You are happy then to lift up a straw man that metals and other solids are
a mystery not understood by physicists, because you see no point in
studying the explanations they claim to have. 

Arindam says: "What they claim is obviously false, and so they must be in
fact puzzled by why solids do not blow apart, as their simple ideas must
suggest, and so I will solve their problem by showing them how solids can
be."

Have I got all that right? 

>> 
>> 
>>> Now why should they, as they all have outer electrons creating negative
>>> charges for repulsion?
>>> They should all be apart!
>>> The answer I gave this morning. It is about the electron acting as a cloud 
>>> around the nucleus, and this cloud can stretch.
>>> When it stretches, the atom becomes a dipole with the nucleus with protons on
>>> one side and give a positive field and the electrons dense on the other side
>>> giving a negative field.
>>> Thus the positive side of an atom attracts the negative side of the other atom
>>> Depending upon how strongly this is done, the material is strong.
>>> 
>>> Okay so far?
>>> 
>>> Now the stunning thing, if the above is accepted, is that the electrons in 
>>> general and an electron in particular is acting as a flexible RUBBER BAND.
>>> 
>>> This picture of the electron as a rubber band is going to be useful when I 
>>> start a topic about how the hydrogen bomb works.
>>> 
>>> The way the hydrogen bomb works is crucial to our understanding how the 
>>> uranium bomb works.
>>> 
>>> You may think that I am going the other way around as the a bomb came before
>>> the h bomb.  Also, how the hell can I explain something which no one ever
>>> understood.
>>> 
>>> Ah, the glorious simplicity of all will be evident, for it results from the 
>>> mind of 
>>> 
>>> Arindam (bin Einstein ban Gandi) Banerjee, greatest genius of all time, sole
>>> god among lotsa devils.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 20:49 -0700
  Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-27 20:57 -0700
    Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 23:16 -0700
      Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-28 02:20 -0700
  Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 01:04 -0700
    Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 03:20 -0700
  Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-28 16:43 +0000
    Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 10:32 -0700
      Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-29 22:35 -0700
        Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 14:21 -0700
          Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-30 21:53 -0700
    Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 07:51 -0700
      Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-30 21:45 -0700
      Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-31 18:41 +0000
      Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:18 -0500
        Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 13:37 -0700
          Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 10:27 -0500
  On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 07:54 -0700
    On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 08:26 -0700
    Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 12:37 +0000
    Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 09:11 -0700
  Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 11:40 +0000
    Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 05:03 -0700
      Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 12:40 +0000
        Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 05:45 -0700
          Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 06:39 -0700
            Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 11:56 -0700
              Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 14:27 -0700
                Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 09:10 -0700
          Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 10:16 -0500

csiph-web