Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #60684

Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/

From "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/
Date 2017-06-13 19:39 +1000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <ohobrg$1j6v$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <lPidnXRbTbwOB6DEnZ2dnUU7-SfNnZ2d@supernews.com><8760g14px9.fsf@nightsong.com> <ohnhes$ce4$1@gioia.aioe.org><05d06c5a-5944-4871-92cb-6d064e31ac4f@googlegroups.com> <ohnkq7$hfn$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Cecil Bayona wrote:
> ...
> > On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 7:08:33 PM UTC-7, HAA wrote:
> ...
> >> Last I heard Chuck still favored 1K screens as being the optimum size chunk
> >> of source to manage at one time.  There is something about that.
> >
>
> It could be a vision issue as I read he has eye problems, large
> character for easy read.

The reference was to this statement:

C.M.   "My Forth has always utilized 1KB blocks of code. This is a
          quantum that is comprehensible and can be seen on a monitor.
          I can't think of code I'd call beautiful that was larger than this."


Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-06-11 14:31 -0500
  Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-06-12 00:37 -0700
    Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-06-12 08:23 -0500
    Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-06-13 12:09 +1000
      Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-06-12 19:42 -0700
        Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2017-06-12 19:55 -0700
        Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-06-12 22:09 -0500
          Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-06-13 19:39 +1000
            Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ minforth@arcor.de - 2017-06-13 04:01 -0700
              Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ JennyB <jennybrien@googlemail.com> - 2017-06-13 09:28 -0700
                Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 01:05 -0700
                Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2017-06-14 10:41 +0200
                Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 03:42 -0700
          Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2017-06-13 10:06 +0000
            Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-06-13 20:42 +1000
      Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-06-14 09:07 -1000
  Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 23:09 -0700
  Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ sdwjack69@gmail.com - 2017-06-15 09:36 -0700

csiph-web