Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #60686
| From | "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ |
| Date | 2017-06-13 20:42 +1000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <ohofi7$1qj8$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <8760g14px9.fsf@nightsong.com> <ohnhes$ce4$1@gioia.aioe.org> <05d06c5a-5944-4871-92cb-6d064e31ac4f@googlegroups.com> <ohnkq7$hfn$1@dont-email.me> <593fb802.496871748@news.eternal-september.org> |
Stephen Pelc wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:09:17 -0500, Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> > wrote: > > >Can't you create your own AT-XY so it doesn't have the bug? Are you > >using the free version of VFX so you don't have the source? > > As is usual with Hugh, he does not read the manual and he does not > listen to what he is told. The VFX console is *NOT* an old-style > addressable terminal; it's a logging device. If Hugh had loaded > the file > Lib\Win32\Genio\Terminal.fth > he could have what he wants. > > Stephen It's hardly intuitive. Anyone d/loading a 'Forth for Windows' would reasonably expect AT-XY to work 'out of the box'. If they didn't give up there and then and chose instead to read the manual, they'd see Chapter 2 - 'Installation and Introduction' comprising 'Installation' and 'Configuration' ... which has nothing to help them.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-06-11 14:31 -0500
Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-06-12 00:37 -0700
Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-06-12 08:23 -0500
Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-06-13 12:09 +1000
Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-06-12 19:42 -0700
Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2017-06-12 19:55 -0700
Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-06-12 22:09 -0500
Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-06-13 19:39 +1000
Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ minforth@arcor.de - 2017-06-13 04:01 -0700
Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ JennyB <jennybrien@googlemail.com> - 2017-06-13 09:28 -0700
Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 01:05 -0700
Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2017-06-14 10:41 +0200
Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 03:42 -0700
Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2017-06-13 10:06 +0000
Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-06-13 20:42 +1000
Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-06-14 09:07 -1000
Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 23:09 -0700
Re: Shadow blocks - "What is old is new again" ;/ sdwjack69@gmail.com - 2017-06-15 09:36 -0700
csiph-web