Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #633994

Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/21/2017 7:31 AM, AbhiJeet Patil wrote:
> On Sunday, May 21, 2017 at 5:33:21 AM UTC+5:30, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 21/05/2017 12:20 AM, AbhiJeet Patil wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Suppose we are standing on ground. I am at point A and you are at
>>> point B. And we both are pulling each other with EQUAL FORCE. I am
>>> not moving, but you move from your place. That is violation of
>>> Newton's third law of motion. You allege that my legs are somehow dug
>>> in the ground. Now we have changed our places. I am standing at your
>>> previous point B and you are standing at point my previous point A.
>>> Now even at standing at point B, I am not moving. What happened to
>>> your theory that my legs were somehow dug in the ground at point A?
>>
>> This doesn't violate Newton's third law, because friction with the
>> ground brings the Earth into the equation.
>>
>> The situation you describe can easily arise, just because we are not of
>> equal weights, and consequently have different levels of friction with
>> the ground. This is, after all, why you can push a coffee cup away from
>> you across a table without yourself getting moved backwards.
>>
>> Sylvia.
> 
> I have no idea how to convince you. I have just shot this video. First I tested Newton's third law of motion. If two bodies of equal mass are moving with equal distance towards each other, then the ground is frictionless. 

... or the ground has equal friction in both or all locations.

First I have shown it in this video that the black slab follows Newton's 
third law i.e the black slab is frictionless. Then in the same video I 
attached my Triangle to Arrowhead turning device and one side of body 
suddenly stops moving.
> 
> https://youtu.be/2F-ox5WSIRU
> 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-04-23 10:09 +1000
  Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 22:08 -0700
    Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-19 20:26 +1000
      Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 07:01 -0700
        Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 11:56 -0500
          Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 07:12 -0700
            Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-21 13:19 -0500
              Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 22:43 -0700
              Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 22:57 -0700
        Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-20 11:42 +1000
          Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 07:20 -0700
            Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-21 10:03 +1000
              Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 21:51 -0400
                Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-21 11:54 +1000
                Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 22:23 -0400
              Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-21 05:31 -0700
                Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-21 09:47 -0500

csiph-web