Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #633776

Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace

Show all headers | View raw

On 19/05/2017 3:08 PM, AbhiJeet Patil wrote:
> On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 5:39:54 AM UTC+5:30, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 21/04/2017 12:41 AM, AbhiJeet Patil wrote:
>>>
>>> The video shows only compression half cycle. In this half cycle,
>>> upper side body (A) remains stationary while second body (B) of equal
>>> mass moves towards it. In expansion half cycle, second body (B)
>>> remains stationary while upper side body (A) moves away from it. Thus
>>> at the end of one complete cycle, we find that the whole device
>>> (including two bodies) are displaced in space without expelling any
>>> reaction mass.
>>
>> It is clear from the video that the upper side does not stay stationary,
>> so what's the point of posting this nonsense?
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> It almost stays stationary. It moves because of weight difference in the connecting rods.
>
> Now I have built new device and I am using right-left threaded bolt to control the motion of both weights. You can see in this video that "upper side" weight does not move from its place.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=el8aduO_1eM
>

There's plenty of friction around. This video shows nothing of significance.

Sylvia

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-04-23 10:09 +1000
  Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 22:08 -0700
    Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-19 20:26 +1000
      Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 07:01 -0700
        Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 11:56 -0500
          Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 07:12 -0700
            Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-21 13:19 -0500
              Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 22:43 -0700
              Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 22:57 -0700
        Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-20 11:42 +1000
          Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 07:20 -0700
            Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-21 10:03 +1000
              Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 21:51 -0400
                Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-21 11:54 +1000
                Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 22:23 -0400
              Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-21 05:31 -0700
                Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-21 09:47 -0500

csiph-web