Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #633869

Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace

Show all headers | View raw

On 20/05/2017 12:01 AM, AbhiJeet Patil wrote:
> On Friday, May 19, 2017 at 3:57:00 PM UTC+5:30, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 19/05/2017 3:08 PM, AbhiJeet Patil wrote:
>>> On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 5:39:54 AM UTC+5:30, Sylvia Else
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 21/04/2017 12:41 AM, AbhiJeet Patil wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The video shows only compression half cycle. In this half
>>>>> cycle, upper side body (A) remains stationary while second
>>>>> body (B) of equal mass moves towards it. In expansion half
>>>>> cycle, second body (B) remains stationary while upper side
>>>>> body (A) moves away from it. Thus at the end of one complete
>>>>> cycle, we find that the whole device (including two bodies)
>>>>> are displaced in space without expelling any reaction mass.
>>>>
>>>> It is clear from the video that the upper side does not stay
>>>> stationary, so what's the point of posting this nonsense?
>>>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>>
>>> It almost stays stationary. It moves because of weight difference
>>> in the connecting rods.
>>>
>>> Now I have built new device and I am using right-left threaded
>>> bolt to control the motion of both weights. You can see in this
>>> video that "upper side" weight does not move from its place.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=el8aduO_1eM
>>>
>>
>> There's plenty of friction around. This video shows nothing of
>> significance.
>>
>> Sylvia
>
> haha... I have worked on this device from Oct 2002 to May 2005. It
> was working and i had even filed 17 provisional patent applications.
> But just when I saw that it is working, I entered in "another world".
> I returned to this device last year and may be I had forgotten
> something. But now i have recollected everything what I had done in
> April 2005.
>
> First video was taken in a room in Shahada town which is 180 Km away.
> Second video was taken here in my Chinawal village. And now I have
> just uploaded third video. These 3 videos are taken on 3 separate
> different floors. There is no friction involved. My further videos
> will clear all the doubts in your mind. But for the moment, this is
> third video...
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVLKd75MneA

The thing is still lying on the floor. How can you say there's no friction?

You're also holding it, so you are part of the experiment, and your mass 
and friction with the floor have to be taken into account.

This experiment is being done so incredibly badly that I have to wonder 
whether it's all a troll.

If not, then you're either totally lacking in education in basic physics 
and/or are seriously deluded (the two often go hand in hand).

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-04-23 10:09 +1000
  Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 22:08 -0700
    Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-19 20:26 +1000
      Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 07:01 -0700
        Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 11:56 -0500
          Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 07:12 -0700
            Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-21 13:19 -0500
              Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 22:43 -0700
              Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 22:57 -0700
        Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-20 11:42 +1000
          Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 07:20 -0700
            Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-21 10:03 +1000
              Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 21:51 -0400
                Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-21 11:54 +1000
                Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 22:23 -0400
              Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-21 05:31 -0700
                Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-21 09:47 -0500

csiph-web