Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.electronics.design > #433842

Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy

Show all headers | View raw

On 04/11/16 02:52, Winfield Hill wrote:
>  Low-voltage devices need not apply, need 14V min.
>  Power package.  Would like 0.5% accuracy, but will 
>  take 1%.  Only ON Semi's version of NSC's ancient
>  LP2950A, in DPak, seems to qualify.  Can this be?
> 
> 

<http://www.electronics-eetimes.com/news/precision-voltage-reference-drives-200ma>

<http://www.linear.com/product/LT6658>

Linear Technology LT6658 can get 200 mA at 0.05% accuracy, with up to
36V input.

I haven't used it myself, I just happened to see the advert a couple of
minutes ago.

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-03 18:52 -0700
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2016-11-03 20:05 -0700
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> - 2016-11-03 23:06 -0400
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-04 06:34 -0700
      Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy speff <spehro@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 13:46 -0700
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy TTman <pcw1.cad@ntlworld.com> - 2016-11-04 13:24 +0000
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-04 06:43 -0700
      Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy TTman <pcw1.cad@ntlworld.com> - 2016-11-04 20:06 +0000
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-11-07 09:07 -0500
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2016-11-04 09:25 -0400
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-04 06:53 -0700
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-04 14:44 +0100
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 11:51 -0700
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-11-04 08:23 -0700
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2016-11-04 08:33 -0700
      Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-11-04 08:50 -0700
        Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2016-11-04 17:16 +0100
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com - 2016-11-04 11:02 -0700
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-04 12:21 -0700

csiph-web