Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #433894

Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy

From Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.design
Subject Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy
Date 2016-11-04 12:21 -0700
Organization Rowland Institute
Message-ID <nvin4902n58@drn.newsguy.com> (permalink)
References <nvgpkd01vll@drn.newsguy.com> <c2dfb0f1-f182-4d9f-95bd-094006f4d400@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com wrote...
>
> Winfield Hill wrote:
>> Low-voltage devices need not apply, need 14V min.
>> Power package.  Would like 0.5% accuracy, but will
>> take 1%.  Only ON Semi's version of NSC's ancient
>> LP2950A, in DPak, seems to qualify.  Can this be?
>
> Ordinarily the old pre-regulator trick using two
> regulators would work but you threw a wrench into
> the works with that USB source stuff. 

 My testbed board can be used in a variety of
 ways and with a variety of power sources. 
 Of course in the event of a USB source, an
 accurate 5V goes out the window.  But that's
 not too bad; I'm using a 4.096V reference IC
 for the onboard ADC.


-- 
 Thanks,
    - Win

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-03 18:52 -0700
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2016-11-03 20:05 -0700
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> - 2016-11-03 23:06 -0400
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-04 06:34 -0700
      Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy speff <spehro@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 13:46 -0700
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy TTman <pcw1.cad@ntlworld.com> - 2016-11-04 13:24 +0000
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-04 06:43 -0700
      Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy TTman <pcw1.cad@ntlworld.com> - 2016-11-04 20:06 +0000
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-11-07 09:07 -0500
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2016-11-04 09:25 -0400
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-04 06:53 -0700
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-04 14:44 +0100
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 11:51 -0700
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-11-04 08:23 -0700
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2016-11-04 08:33 -0700
      Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-11-04 08:50 -0700
        Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2016-11-04 17:16 +0100
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com - 2016-11-04 11:02 -0700
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-04 12:21 -0700

csiph-web