Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.electronics.design > #433844

Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy

From Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.design
Subject Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy
Date 2016-11-04 06:53 -0700
Organization Rowland Institute
Message-ID <nvi3s801b1h@drn.newsguy.com> (permalink)
References <nvgpkd01vll@drn.newsguy.com> <kt2p1c1qhoqjgde4fq2iha054de2mrfbtr@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Boris Mohar wrote...
>
>On 3 Nov 2016 18:52:13 -0700, Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
>> Low-voltage devices need not apply, need 14V min.
>> Power package.  Would like 0.5% accuracy, but will 
>> take 1%.  Only ON Semi's version of NSC's ancient
>> LP2950A, in DPak, seems to qualify.  Can this be?
>
> Seiko S-1142D50I-E6T1U  

 Thanks, Boris!
 S-1142, HSOP-6 package, 5x6mm, very interesting!


-- 
 Thanks,
    - Win

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-03 18:52 -0700
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2016-11-03 20:05 -0700
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> - 2016-11-03 23:06 -0400
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-04 06:34 -0700
      Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy speff <spehro@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 13:46 -0700
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy TTman <pcw1.cad@ntlworld.com> - 2016-11-04 13:24 +0000
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-04 06:43 -0700
      Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy TTman <pcw1.cad@ntlworld.com> - 2016-11-04 20:06 +0000
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-11-07 09:07 -0500
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2016-11-04 09:25 -0400
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-04 06:53 -0700
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-04 14:44 +0100
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 11:51 -0700
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-11-04 08:23 -0700
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2016-11-04 08:33 -0700
      Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-11-04 08:50 -0700
        Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2016-11-04 17:16 +0100
  Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com - 2016-11-04 11:02 -0700
    Re: 5V 200mA LDO with 0.5% accuracy Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-04 12:21 -0700

csiph-web