Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #433179

Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true?

From amdx <nojunk@knology.net>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.design
Subject Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true?
Date 2016-10-31 13:35 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <nv82s7$1mq$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <9e12b240-1975-4247-a98c-89705611b6ca@googlegroups.com> <nv7o16$m90$1@dont-email.me> <bbKRz.12420$8F2.7382@fx42.iad> <nv7tvu$e1m$1@dont-email.me> <eKLRz.27228$lI2.11386@fx39.iad>

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/31/2016 1:06 PM, bitrex wrote:
> On 10/31/2016 01:11 PM, amdx wrote:
>
>> Six figure home? There's not much left under 6 figures. I bought a
>> $33,000 house in 1984 and a $82,000 house in 1994, but in 2016 it would
>> be tough even in the LCOL area I'm in.
>
> Is the 1984 home still valued at $33,000? Being born in the Truman
> administration has its advantages, I guess.

  That's a bit ignorant of the history of housing prices and of 
presidential history.
  The answers are No and I wasn't and it could be.





>>> The reason for your discontent was never the government,
>>
>>   If you think our government is not wasteful with bad policies,
>> ("you must be a democrat!") you just haven't been paying attention.
>
> It's a bizarre obsession. If you didn't like the way the rest of America
> was steering things you should've left a long time ago - clearly the
> least stressful option.

  Why would I leave, the advantages of living in the U.S. so numerous.

>>> it was always available for study right there in the bathroom mirror.
>>> Too bad y'all
>>> never noticed - oh well. Suck it, suckas.
>>
>>  Oh, you lose, you had to resort to name calling.
>>                       Thanks for the entertainment,
>>                                                 Mikek
>>
>
> So competitive.
>
   Did your school give you a ribbon for participating?
Did you ever notice stoners lack competitiveness?
                                      Mikek



Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Obama Rebate:  too good to be true? stacy4linnix@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 13:46 -0700
  Re: Obama Rebate:  too good to be true? stacy4linnix@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 13:56 -0700
    Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 10:30 -0500
      Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 12:20 -0400
        Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 12:11 -0500
          Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 14:06 -0400
            Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 13:35 -0500
          Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-31 18:50 -0400
      Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-31 12:28 -0400
  Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-29 21:55 -0400
    Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-30 11:43 -0700
    Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 12:19 -0500
      Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 14:12 -0400
        Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 13:39 -0500
  Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 22:09 -0400

csiph-web