Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #433153
| From | amdx <nojunk@knology.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? |
| Date | 2016-10-31 10:30 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nv7o16$m90$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <3ed9d0b4-3317-403a-8b3a-7a1bdce16bf0@googlegroups.com> <9e12b240-1975-4247-a98c-89705611b6ca@googlegroups.com> |
On 10/29/2016 3:56 PM, stacy4linnix@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-7, stacy4...@gmail.com wrote:
>> http://pro.oxfordclub.com/A4DTAX0416TO79OXFLTBRKCAMALE4IUPS4/POXFSA03/?h=true
>>
>> Can i buy an EV (i.e. GM Bolt) and get 30K back?
>
> Never mind, it's just sale tax deduction gimmick.
>
Is this the same legislation that allowed John Stossel to buy
a street legal golf cart and get a tax CREDIT that paid for the whole
cost of the golf cart? He wasn't the only one, I just saw his report
where he parked it on a New York City street and interviewed people,
while thanking them for buying him a golf cart. The point was to show
how stupid government can be with your money.
There were some that bought the golf cart, the tax payers paid for it,
then the owner leased the cart to a golf course.
Everyone was happy and the taxpayers were oblivious.
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/2010/02/10/how-did-john-stossel-get-free-golf-cart-from-government.html
Mikek
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Obama Rebate: too good to be true? stacy4linnix@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 13:46 -0700
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? stacy4linnix@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 13:56 -0700
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 10:30 -0500
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 12:20 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 12:11 -0500
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 14:06 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 13:35 -0500
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-31 18:50 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-31 12:28 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-29 21:55 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-30 11:43 -0700
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 12:19 -0500
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 14:12 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 13:39 -0500
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 22:09 -0400
csiph-web