Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #433170

Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true?

From amdx <nojunk@knology.net>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.design
Subject Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true?
Date 2016-10-31 12:11 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <nv7tvu$e1m$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <3ed9d0b4-3317-403a-8b3a-7a1bdce16bf0@googlegroups.com> <9e12b240-1975-4247-a98c-89705611b6ca@googlegroups.com> <nv7o16$m90$1@dont-email.me> <bbKRz.12420$8F2.7382@fx42.iad>

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/31/2016 11:20 AM, bitrex wrote:
> On 10/31/2016 11:30 AM, amdx wrote:
>> On 10/29/2016 3:56 PM, stacy4linnix@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-7, stacy4...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>> http://pro.oxfordclub.com/A4DTAX0416TO79OXFLTBRKCAMALE4IUPS4/POXFSA03/?h=true
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can i buy an EV (i.e. GM Bolt) and get 30K back?
>>>
>>> Never mind, it's just sale tax deduction gimmick.
>>>
>>
>>  Is this the same legislation that allowed John Stossel to buy
>> a street legal golf cart and get a tax CREDIT that paid for the whole
>> cost of the golf cart? He wasn't the only one, I just saw his report
>> where he parked it on a New York City street and interviewed people,
>> while thanking them for buying him a golf cart. The point was to show
>> how stupid government can be with your money.
>> There were some that bought the golf cart, the tax payers paid for it,
>> then the owner leased the cart to a golf course.
>>  Everyone was happy and the taxpayers were oblivious.
>>
>>> http://www.foxnews.com/story/2010/02/10/how-did-john-stossel-get-free-golf-cart-from-government.html
>>>
>>>
>>
>>                                         Mikek
>>
>
> One might argue that there's no foolproof way to prevent people with the
> knowhow and determination to abuse a system from doing just that.
>
> Rather like constant complaints by conservatives that because the EBT
> system is abused, the whole system needs to be scrapped, regardless of
> how many millions of kids are able to eat because of it. Yep, I'm sure
> there are thousands of freeloaders eating lobster dinners off of it
> every night for years. So what? What's your point, exactly?
>
> The Feds dole out millions of dollars every hour to the oil industry,
> Homeland Security, and to fight foreign wars I ain't never asked to be
> involved in. I find it pretty difficult to summon up any outrage over
> golf carts.

Who did you psychoanalyze with your diatribe? If me, you were in the 
wrong room.

  Two of those three are proper functions of the federal government.

> I feel pretty sorry for you squares, in fact.


   Squares/ Are you having a flashback? LOL

  You bought the line that
> the key to happiness was to work your ass off for The Man for 40 years,

Again your in the wrong room.

> rack up a bunch of debt and that somehow all the good stuff would fall
> into place.

I don't have any debt, and all the good stuff has fallen into place.
Of course it didn't really fall into place, it was a long term plan
that succeeded.

  But it seems all that promise delivered on was a deep-seated
> resentment and a pathological urge to squabble

Seems you are the one spewing all the anger. Just take a few deep 
breaths and calm down.

> over every last penny the
> poor are "stealing" from you,

Well there is fraud that goes on, but most of it just following
the rules set up to qualify for the benefit.


> and sitting around in a six-figure home
> pondering the ways in which the government must be "oppressing" you.

Six figure home? There's not much left under 6 figures. I bought a 
$33,000 house in 1984 and a $82,000 house in 1994, but in 2016 it would 
be tough even in the LCOL area I'm in.

> What a hoot.

  Happy you found some pleasure.

> The reason for your discontent was never the government,

   If you think our government is not wasteful with bad policies,
("you must be a democrat!") you just haven't been paying attention.

>it was always available for study right there in the bathroom mirror. Too bad y'all
> never noticed - oh well. Suck it, suckas.

  Oh, you lose, you had to resort to name calling.
                       Thanks for the entertainment,
                                                 Mikek



Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Obama Rebate:  too good to be true? stacy4linnix@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 13:46 -0700
  Re: Obama Rebate:  too good to be true? stacy4linnix@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 13:56 -0700
    Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 10:30 -0500
      Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 12:20 -0400
        Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 12:11 -0500
          Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 14:06 -0400
            Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 13:35 -0500
          Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-31 18:50 -0400
      Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-31 12:28 -0400
  Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-29 21:55 -0400
    Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-30 11:43 -0700
    Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 12:19 -0500
      Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 14:12 -0400
        Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 13:39 -0500
  Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 22:09 -0400

csiph-web