Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #433170
| From | amdx <nojunk@knology.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? |
| Date | 2016-10-31 12:11 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nv7tvu$e1m$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <3ed9d0b4-3317-403a-8b3a-7a1bdce16bf0@googlegroups.com> <9e12b240-1975-4247-a98c-89705611b6ca@googlegroups.com> <nv7o16$m90$1@dont-email.me> <bbKRz.12420$8F2.7382@fx42.iad> |
On 10/31/2016 11:20 AM, bitrex wrote:
> On 10/31/2016 11:30 AM, amdx wrote:
>> On 10/29/2016 3:56 PM, stacy4linnix@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 1:46:23 PM UTC-7, stacy4...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>> http://pro.oxfordclub.com/A4DTAX0416TO79OXFLTBRKCAMALE4IUPS4/POXFSA03/?h=true
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can i buy an EV (i.e. GM Bolt) and get 30K back?
>>>
>>> Never mind, it's just sale tax deduction gimmick.
>>>
>>
>> Is this the same legislation that allowed John Stossel to buy
>> a street legal golf cart and get a tax CREDIT that paid for the whole
>> cost of the golf cart? He wasn't the only one, I just saw his report
>> where he parked it on a New York City street and interviewed people,
>> while thanking them for buying him a golf cart. The point was to show
>> how stupid government can be with your money.
>> There were some that bought the golf cart, the tax payers paid for it,
>> then the owner leased the cart to a golf course.
>> Everyone was happy and the taxpayers were oblivious.
>>
>>> http://www.foxnews.com/story/2010/02/10/how-did-john-stossel-get-free-golf-cart-from-government.html
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Mikek
>>
>
> One might argue that there's no foolproof way to prevent people with the
> knowhow and determination to abuse a system from doing just that.
>
> Rather like constant complaints by conservatives that because the EBT
> system is abused, the whole system needs to be scrapped, regardless of
> how many millions of kids are able to eat because of it. Yep, I'm sure
> there are thousands of freeloaders eating lobster dinners off of it
> every night for years. So what? What's your point, exactly?
>
> The Feds dole out millions of dollars every hour to the oil industry,
> Homeland Security, and to fight foreign wars I ain't never asked to be
> involved in. I find it pretty difficult to summon up any outrage over
> golf carts.
Who did you psychoanalyze with your diatribe? If me, you were in the
wrong room.
Two of those three are proper functions of the federal government.
> I feel pretty sorry for you squares, in fact.
Squares/ Are you having a flashback? LOL
You bought the line that
> the key to happiness was to work your ass off for The Man for 40 years,
Again your in the wrong room.
> rack up a bunch of debt and that somehow all the good stuff would fall
> into place.
I don't have any debt, and all the good stuff has fallen into place.
Of course it didn't really fall into place, it was a long term plan
that succeeded.
But it seems all that promise delivered on was a deep-seated
> resentment and a pathological urge to squabble
Seems you are the one spewing all the anger. Just take a few deep
breaths and calm down.
> over every last penny the
> poor are "stealing" from you,
Well there is fraud that goes on, but most of it just following
the rules set up to qualify for the benefit.
> and sitting around in a six-figure home
> pondering the ways in which the government must be "oppressing" you.
Six figure home? There's not much left under 6 figures. I bought a
$33,000 house in 1984 and a $82,000 house in 1994, but in 2016 it would
be tough even in the LCOL area I'm in.
> What a hoot.
Happy you found some pleasure.
> The reason for your discontent was never the government,
If you think our government is not wasteful with bad policies,
("you must be a democrat!") you just haven't been paying attention.
>it was always available for study right there in the bathroom mirror. Too bad y'all
> never noticed - oh well. Suck it, suckas.
Oh, you lose, you had to resort to name calling.
Thanks for the entertainment,
Mikek
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Obama Rebate: too good to be true? stacy4linnix@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 13:46 -0700
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? stacy4linnix@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 13:56 -0700
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 10:30 -0500
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 12:20 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 12:11 -0500
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 14:06 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 13:35 -0500
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-31 18:50 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-31 12:28 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-29 21:55 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-30 11:43 -0700
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 12:19 -0500
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 14:12 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 13:39 -0500
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 22:09 -0400
csiph-web