Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #433018
| From | Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? |
| Date | 2016-10-30 11:43 -0700 |
| Organization | Rowland Institute |
| Message-ID | <nv5f05023c6@drn.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <3ed9d0b4-3317-403a-8b3a-7a1bdce16bf0@googlegroups.com> <rqcRz.1141$OD2.577@fx09.iad> |
bitrex wrote...
>
> stacy4linnix@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Can i buy an EV (i.e. GM Bolt) and get 30K back?
>
> Clearly getting 30k back on a car with a ~35k MSRP
> is impossible ...
I got $10k back after paying for my $34k solar
roof. But that wasn't an Obama rebate, it was
from the Republican house and senate, matching
a change in the law to allow exporting U.S. oil.
--
Thanks,
- Win
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Obama Rebate: too good to be true? stacy4linnix@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 13:46 -0700
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? stacy4linnix@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 13:56 -0700
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 10:30 -0500
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 12:20 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 12:11 -0500
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 14:06 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 13:35 -0500
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-31 18:50 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-31 12:28 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-29 21:55 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-30 11:43 -0700
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 12:19 -0500
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 14:12 -0400
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 13:39 -0500
Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 22:09 -0400
csiph-web