Groups > sci.electronics.design > #433018

Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true?

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drn
From	Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu>
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
Subject	Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true?
Date	30 Oct 2016 11:43:17 -0700
Organization	Rowland Institute
Lines	18
Message-ID	<nv5f05023c6@drn.newsguy.com> (permalink)
References	<3ed9d0b4-3317-403a-8b3a-7a1bdce16bf0@googlegroups.com> <rqcRz.1141$OD2.577@fx09.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host	p91c84b79fc180db506601d57616eb47ea9d98e24f8fa829a.newsdawg.com
User-Agent	Direct Read News 5.60
X-Received-Bytes	1002
X-Received-Body-CRC	1026644181
Xref	csiph.com sci.electronics.design:433018

Show key headers only | View raw

bitrex wrote...
>
> stacy4linnix@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Can i buy an EV (i.e. GM Bolt) and get 30K back?
>
> Clearly getting 30k back on a car with a ~35k MSRP
> is impossible ...

 I got $10k back after paying for my $34k solar
 roof.  But that wasn't an Obama rebate, it was
 from the Republican house and senate, matching
 a change in the law to allow exporting U.S. oil.

-- 
 Thanks,
    - Win

Thread

Obama Rebate:  too good to be true? stacy4linnix@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 13:46 -0700
  Re: Obama Rebate:  too good to be true? stacy4linnix@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 13:56 -0700
    Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 10:30 -0500
      Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 12:20 -0400
        Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 12:11 -0500
          Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 14:06 -0400
            Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 13:35 -0500
          Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-31 18:50 -0400
      Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-31 12:28 -0400
  Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-29 21:55 -0400
    Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-30 11:43 -0700
    Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 12:19 -0500
      Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 14:12 -0400
        Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 13:39 -0500
  Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 22:09 -0400

csiph-web