Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #430682

Re: 10 mega-watt hours

From Ralph Barone <ralph@invalid.com>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.design
Subject Re: 10 mega-watt hours
Date 2016-10-09 05:02 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <ntcj07$ka1$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <nt989f$163$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nt9bs9026u@drn.newsguy.com> <qofgvb9d924v1lt01tsca4q8ub3712l5j1@4ax.com> <ntc00u$1v27$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jh5jvbdjp02tq5asgv3g0ea8h4cvd83ige@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Oct 2016 23:38:06 +0000 (UTC), Ralph Barone
> <ralph@invalid.com> wrote:
> 
>> Arizona is not a little electrical island. It is interconnected with the
>> entire West Coast and electricity generated in numerous ways is bought and
>> sold across the entire interconnection.
> 
> Yep, Arizona is a very well connected, although it's not with the
> entire left coast:
> <http://www.caiso.com/informed/Pages/CleanGrid/EIMOverview.aspx>
> The "Energy Imbalance Market" is legal way to resell cheap surplus
> renewable energy among it's members without being accused of running a
> price fixing cartel.  It also helps its members comply with various
> Federal regulations.  I expect the EIM to grow to other utilities.
> 

Note that the EIM is not the whole electricity market, but just one way to
sell energy. Typically there is a "day ahead" market and an "hour ahead"
market. EIM seems to provide an automated solution for even faster response
to accommodate intermittent resources (ie: wind and solar).  However, If
Arizona isn't currently taking advantage of cheap Pacific Northwest hydro
power in the spring, they're wasting their customers' money. And likewise,
the utilities with easily dispatchable generation and available storage
(again, read hydro) are buying up cheap nuclear power at night and
reselling it as hydro during the day. 

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

10 mega-watt hours Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-07 11:16 -0700
  Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-10-07 14:13 -0500
    Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2016-10-07 12:41 -0700
      Re: 10 mega-watt hours makolber@yahoo.com - 2016-10-07 13:08 -0700
        Re: 10 mega-watt hours Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-07 14:27 -0700
      Re: 10 mega-watt hours Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-07 14:09 -0700
        Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2016-10-07 14:18 -0700
          Re: 10 mega-watt hours Ralph Barone <ralph@invalid.com> - 2016-10-07 22:40 +0000
            Re: 10 mega-watt hours Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-07 16:42 -0700
              Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2016-10-07 17:35 -0700
                Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-08 09:09 -0700
                Re: 10 mega-watt hours John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-10-08 09:53 -0700
                Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-08 11:10 -0700
                Re: 10 mega-watt hours Bob Engelhardt <BobEngelhardt@comcast.net> - 2016-10-09 12:30 -0400
                Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-09 10:26 -0700
                Re: 10 mega-watt hours Ralph Barone <ralph@invalid.com> - 2016-10-08 23:38 +0000
                Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-08 18:13 -0700
                Re: 10 mega-watt hours Ralph Barone <ralph@invalid.com> - 2016-10-09 05:02 +0000
                Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-08 23:29 -0700
          Re: 10 mega-watt hours Chris Jones <lugnut808@spam.yahoo.com> - 2016-10-09 11:42 +1100
  Re: 10 mega-watt hours Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> - 2016-10-07 17:30 -0400
    Re: 10 mega-watt hours Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-07 17:14 -0700
      Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com> - 2016-10-11 10:28 -0500
        heatpump vs furnace Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-12 05:57 -0700
          Re: heatpump vs furnace bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2016-10-12 07:33 -0700
            Re: heatpump vs furnace "dcaster@krl.org" <dcaster@krl.org> - 2016-10-12 17:41 -0700
              Re: heatpump vs furnace bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2016-10-12 18:26 -0700
                Re: heatpump vs furnace "dcaster@krl.org" <dcaster@krl.org> - 2016-10-13 06:45 -0700
              Re: heatpump vs furnace Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-12 18:57 -0700
                Re: heatpump vs furnace bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2016-10-12 22:36 -0700
                Re: heatpump vs furnace Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-13 03:57 -0700
          Re: heatpump vs furnace Ecnerwal <MyNameForward@ReplaceWithMyVices.Com.invalid> - 2016-10-12 10:33 -0400
            Re: heatpump vs furnace Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-12 09:46 -0700
              Re: heatpump vs furnace Ecnerwal <MyNameForward@ReplaceWithMyVices.Com.invalid> - 2016-10-12 14:39 -0400
          Re: heatpump vs furnace Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2016-10-12 08:10 -0700
            Re: heatpump vs furnace Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-12 09:39 -0700
          Re: heatpump vs furnace makolber@yahoo.com - 2016-10-12 13:02 -0700
            Re: heatpump vs furnace Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-13 06:10 -0700
          Re: heatpump vs furnace "David Eather" <eather@tpg.com.au> - 2016-10-15 14:47 +1000
            Re: heatpump vs furnace krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-15 10:56 -0400
              Re: heatpump vs furnace "David Eather" <eather@tpg.com.au> - 2016-10-17 12:47 +1000
                Re: heatpump vs furnace krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-17 19:50 -0400
  Re: 10 mega-watt hours sean.c4s.vn@gmail.com - 2016-10-12 06:13 -0700
  Re: 10 mega-watt hours Yzordderrex <powersupplyguy@netzero.net> - 2016-10-13 07:52 -0700
    Re: 10 mega-watt hours Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-13 08:09 -0700
      Re: 10 mega-watt hours Yzordderrex <powersupplyguy@netzero.net> - 2016-10-14 03:05 -0700
        Re: 10 mega-watt hours Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-14 05:52 -0700

csiph-web