Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #430598
| From | Ralph Barone <ralph@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: 10 mega-watt hours |
| Date | 2016-10-07 22:40 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nt989f$163$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <nt8opm01slg@drn.newsguy.com> <aZydnWbkobjKbmrKnZ2dnUU7-K2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <miufvbd0fpugmga5lodmudeogiig13t9kb@4ax.com> <nt92ut02ip0@drn.newsguy.com> <l54gvb9ddf8le20mjfc08eer6kla4falqh@4ax.com> |
Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote: > On 7 Oct 2016 14:09:49 -0700, Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> > wrote: > >> Jim Thompson wrote... >>> >>> On Fri, 07 Oct 2016 14:13:31 -0500, Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Winfield Hill wrote: >>>> >>>>> The production meter for our solar roof just >>>>> ticked over past 10MWh. That's a pretty >>>>> serious amount of power to generate in the >>>>> 9.5 months since switching on the system. >>>>> https://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com/pv/public_systems/WAJT773668/overview >>>> >>>> So, are they paying you for the energy, or does >>>> enphase make all the money? >> >> I purchased the system, and own its electricity, >> enphase server access is part of my purchase. >> >>> It's all subsidized by us sucker taxpayers :-( >> >> True, in part, but may I point out that you enjoy >> cheap electricity from a dam built by US taxpayers. >> We don't have anything like that here. Most of >> our energy is subsidized in one way or another. > > Actually, no. My electricity comes from nuclear, coal and > natural-gas-fired plants. > > ...Jim Thompson As well as wind, solar, hydro and possibly geothermal, but don't tell anyone.
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
10 mega-watt hours Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-07 11:16 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-10-07 14:13 -0500
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2016-10-07 12:41 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours makolber@yahoo.com - 2016-10-07 13:08 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-07 14:27 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-07 14:09 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2016-10-07 14:18 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Ralph Barone <ralph@invalid.com> - 2016-10-07 22:40 +0000
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-07 16:42 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2016-10-07 17:35 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-08 09:09 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-10-08 09:53 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-08 11:10 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Bob Engelhardt <BobEngelhardt@comcast.net> - 2016-10-09 12:30 -0400
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-09 10:26 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Ralph Barone <ralph@invalid.com> - 2016-10-08 23:38 +0000
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-08 18:13 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Ralph Barone <ralph@invalid.com> - 2016-10-09 05:02 +0000
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-10-08 23:29 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Chris Jones <lugnut808@spam.yahoo.com> - 2016-10-09 11:42 +1100
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> - 2016-10-07 17:30 -0400
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-07 17:14 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com> - 2016-10-11 10:28 -0500
heatpump vs furnace Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-12 05:57 -0700
Re: heatpump vs furnace bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2016-10-12 07:33 -0700
Re: heatpump vs furnace "dcaster@krl.org" <dcaster@krl.org> - 2016-10-12 17:41 -0700
Re: heatpump vs furnace bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2016-10-12 18:26 -0700
Re: heatpump vs furnace "dcaster@krl.org" <dcaster@krl.org> - 2016-10-13 06:45 -0700
Re: heatpump vs furnace Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-12 18:57 -0700
Re: heatpump vs furnace bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2016-10-12 22:36 -0700
Re: heatpump vs furnace Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-13 03:57 -0700
Re: heatpump vs furnace Ecnerwal <MyNameForward@ReplaceWithMyVices.Com.invalid> - 2016-10-12 10:33 -0400
Re: heatpump vs furnace Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-12 09:46 -0700
Re: heatpump vs furnace Ecnerwal <MyNameForward@ReplaceWithMyVices.Com.invalid> - 2016-10-12 14:39 -0400
Re: heatpump vs furnace Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2016-10-12 08:10 -0700
Re: heatpump vs furnace Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-12 09:39 -0700
Re: heatpump vs furnace makolber@yahoo.com - 2016-10-12 13:02 -0700
Re: heatpump vs furnace Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-13 06:10 -0700
Re: heatpump vs furnace "David Eather" <eather@tpg.com.au> - 2016-10-15 14:47 +1000
Re: heatpump vs furnace krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-15 10:56 -0400
Re: heatpump vs furnace "David Eather" <eather@tpg.com.au> - 2016-10-17 12:47 +1000
Re: heatpump vs furnace krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-17 19:50 -0400
Re: 10 mega-watt hours sean.c4s.vn@gmail.com - 2016-10-12 06:13 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Yzordderrex <powersupplyguy@netzero.net> - 2016-10-13 07:52 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-13 08:09 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Yzordderrex <powersupplyguy@netzero.net> - 2016-10-14 03:05 -0700
Re: 10 mega-watt hours Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-14 05:52 -0700
csiph-web