Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #429948
| From | John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Input (protection) FET or npn |
| Date | 2016-09-30 12:19 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nsm6pg$jvp$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <2ab9c28c-9be2-4569-bf51-56ba6febd9a7@googlegroups.com> |
On 9/30/2016 9:52 AM, George Herold wrote: > Hi all a simple input circuit take a input pulse. And stretches it a bit. > (from previous post on pulse stretching.) > The input looks like this.. (bad asci art) > > +5V > +--------+ > | R(1M) > _ ---+ > ^ | | > | |/c +--->'HC14 > pulse in---R(100)-+---| | > | |\e C(.1u) > _ | | > ^ GND+ > | > GND > > 100 ohms in series and diodes to the rails. > I can then either drive a FET (2n7000) or npn (2n4401) > both work fine. > The exact width of the output pulse is not critical. > Which is more robust? > > George H. What is the nature of the input pulse? 5V, 50V, 500V, etc? Energy capability? 1us, 10us, 1000us, etc? Caution: If the input pulse is very energetic and of sufficient voltage/energy, it could raise your 5V rail to device destruction.
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Input (protection) FET or npn George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2016-09-30 07:52 -0700
Re: Input (protection) FET or npn George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2016-09-30 08:05 -0700
Re: Input (protection) FET or npn Frank Miles <fpm@u.washington.edu> - 2016-09-30 15:28 +0000
Re: Input (protection) FET or npn George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2016-09-30 08:52 -0700
Re: Input (protection) FET or npn John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-30 08:35 -0700
Re: Input (protection) FET or npn George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2016-09-30 08:54 -0700
Re: Input (protection) FET or npn Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2016-09-30 08:47 -0700
Re: Input (protection) FET or npn George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2016-09-30 09:14 -0700
Re: Input (protection) FET or npn Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2016-09-30 09:50 -0700
Re: Input (protection) FET or npn John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> - 2016-09-30 12:19 -0500
Re: Input (protection) FET or npn George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2016-09-30 11:40 -0700
Re: Input (protection) FET or npn Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2016-09-30 12:38 -0700
Re: Input (protection) FET or npn John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-30 13:15 -0700
csiph-web