Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #394130

Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'.

From "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'.
Date 2016-09-29 02:47 +1000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <nsgs7f$4dh$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (12 earlier) <e4v6p6F7k40U1@mid.individual.net> <nseldr$op5$4@gioia.aioe.org> <e50l8pFihdkU1@mid.individual.net> <nsfg9r$1seb$2@gioia.aioe.org> <e5124eFl6uaU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 28/09/16 15:18, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 28/09/2016 2:18 PM, HGW wrote:
>> On 28/09/16 11:38, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2016 6:39 AM, HGWilson, DSc. wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> Don't want to do a step by step argument? Worried about what
>>>>>>> happened
>>>>>>> last time?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is obvious what happens. The later pulses move towards the earlier
>>>>>> ones....just as it happens with bullets...
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is it obvious - what's your argument in detail?
>>>>
>>>> Just try firing bullets from an accelerating machine gun in remote
>>>> space.
>>>> It is quite obvious what will happen to them. Even a 2yo kid could work
>>>> that out.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, with bullets that don't travel at the speed of light, it's true.
>>>
>>> Now, given that pulses of light do travel at the speed of light, what is
>>> your argument in detail?
>>
>> The speed of light relative to the source is indeed c. Since the source
>> is accelerating, no two pulses will move at the same speed. What could
>> possibly make them do otherwise?
>
> Suppose you have an observer initially at rest relative to the source.
> The sources emits a pulse, then accelerates for a while and emits a
> second pulse. Meanwhile the observer remains accelerated.
>
> Since the second pulse is moving at c relative to the source, it is also
> moving at c relative to the observer, because anything moving a c does
> so relative to anything else.

If you want to believe that there is little hope for you....I suggest 
you should start looking for the aether that you seem to believe exists.

> So from the perspective of the observer, both pulses are moving at c,
> and do not get closer together.

> Also, since the first pulse is moving at c relative to the observer, it
> is moving at c relative to the source even after the source has
> accelerated. So from the perspective of the source, both pulses are
> moving at c, and do not get closer together.

You are quoting LET. I'm glad you now realize that SR is the same 
theory. I have been telling everyone that for years.
Both theories depend on the existence of an absolute light carrying 
medium...and there is none.

> This is a manifestation of the way velocities compose in relativity; any
> velocity composed with c just gives c again.

I showed how that was just a maths trick...pure circular logic.

> Sylvia.
>

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-22 12:07 +1000
  Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-22 13:42 +1000
    Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-22 14:56 +1000
      Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-23 13:09 +1000
        Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-24 09:23 +1000
          Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-24 17:19 +1000
            Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-24 04:01 -0700
              Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-24 22:07 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 13:01 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-25 05:53 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 15:35 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-24 15:48 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-25 17:44 +1000
            Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-24 22:04 +1000
              Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-24 22:12 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-25 06:13 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 15:37 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-25 11:55 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-27 12:43 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-27 20:23 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-27 22:25 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-28 06:39 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-28 11:38 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-28 14:18 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-28 15:18 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-29 02:47 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-29 09:25 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-29 20:34 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-30 09:41 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-30 00:06 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-30 04:10 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-30 04:21 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-30 13:04 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-09-30 11:48 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-10-01 08:13 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:52 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-10-02 08:24 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 09:52 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-10-02 00:03 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-02 18:07 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-10-02 08:27 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-02 08:33 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-10-03 09:28 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-03 11:05 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-05 09:14 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-04 17:23 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-10-05 09:36 +0200
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-06 09:00 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-10-06 09:08 +0200
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-10-03 08:51 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-03 10:39 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 09:53 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-10-06 20:26 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 09:44 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-10-06 10:54 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 12:57 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-10-06 11:09 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 13:45 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-10-07 05:58 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 08:18 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-10-07 09:39 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 12:07 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-10-08 06:18 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-08 15:07 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-07 10:20 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 11:10 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 13:44 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 13:45 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-06 11:57 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-29 06:08 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 19:10 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-09-29 07:26 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-30 09:10 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-09-30 08:27 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-09-28 10:14 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-28 13:32 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-09-28 13:44 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-28 14:31 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-09-29 06:54 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-29 07:20 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-09-29 07:32 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-29 08:13 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-09-29 08:42 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-29 10:04 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-09-29 10:44 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-29 13:28 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-09-29 15:26 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-29 02:29 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-29 20:51 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-30 03:13 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-10-03 09:23 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-03 05:57 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-10-02 09:53 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-01 16:22 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-02 18:09 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-10-03 13:10 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-05 09:16 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-10-05 11:37 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-04 17:44 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-10-05 12:02 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-05 08:07 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-10-06 11:54 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-06 11:08 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-05 03:54 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-05 00:23 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-05 15:59 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-05 09:30 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-06 08:46 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-06 00:08 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-07 09:32 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-07 02:24 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 13:59 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Beck Muller <beckm@karloviccenter.org> - 2016-10-17 19:32 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 15:37 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-18 07:21 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 15:36 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-18 09:25 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 16:10 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-18 07:55 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-19 07:10 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 09:37 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-19 07:07 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 07:35 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-19 06:04 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-17 22:33 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-18 10:04 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-18 03:25 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-19 07:12 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-18 23:18 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-10-05 09:56 +0200
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-06 08:49 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-10-06 09:08 +0200
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-07 09:40 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-10-06 17:37 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 07:21 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-07 16:09 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 12:04 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-10-08 00:02 +0200
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-10-07 14:44 +0200
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-08 09:19 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-07 20:15 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-09 19:49 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-09 04:57 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-09 17:37 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-10-08 10:03 +0200
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 13:13 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-06 08:55 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-10-06 11:56 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-07 09:49 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-10-07 14:46 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-08 06:28 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-10-19 17:57 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-19 00:20 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-10-19 19:27 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-19 01:58 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-10-19 20:12 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-19 02:45 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Walter Bautista <wabau@outlookbay.org> - 2016-10-25 21:01 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-25 23:33 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 02:56 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-19 04:57 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-10-19 06:38 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-10-20 03:16 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-19 18:03 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-10-20 20:01 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-20 15:22 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-19 13:54 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-10-20 20:09 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-19 13:21 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-10-20 13:51 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-21 09:29 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-10-05 18:16 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 09:07 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-07 09:56 +1100
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-25 03:21 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-25 19:28 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-26 01:49 +0000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-26 19:44 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-26 04:00 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-09-25 14:52 +0200
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-09-25 07:30 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-09-25 18:54 +0200
              Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-24 07:39 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-25 19:32 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-25 04:11 -0700
              Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 13:00 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-25 19:44 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-25 04:22 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 17:07 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-27 03:25 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-26 11:03 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 06:11 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-27 04:58 -0700
          Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-09-24 15:06 +0200
            Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-25 05:57 +1000
              Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-09-25 09:59 +0200
    Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-21 23:13 -0700
  Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 07:13 +0200
    Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-22 20:03 +1000
      Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 13:41 +0200
        Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-23 05:58 +1000
          Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 15:13 -0500
            Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-23 07:04 +1000
              Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 07:02 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-24 09:30 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 12:47 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-25 06:16 +1000
          Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 09:04 +0200
            Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-24 09:32 +1000
  Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-09-22 07:37 +0200
    Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-22 20:01 +1000
  Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 04:27 -0700
  Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 16:56 -0700
    Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-24 22:11 +1000
      Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 13:04 -0500
        Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-25 06:25 +1000
          Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 16:31 -0500
            Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-27 03:28 +1000
              Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 06:11 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-28 06:51 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 17:03 -0500
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-28 11:14 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-27 19:23 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-28 14:20 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-28 04:31 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-29 20:59 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-29 05:48 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-30 09:14 +1000
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-29 19:58 -0700
                Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-28 05:05 -0700
  Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-09-24 10:45 -0700
    Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-25 06:30 +1000
  Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Thomas <thomas.smid@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 02:32 -0700
  Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. bartekltg <bartek@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 13:31 +0200
  Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-09-26 05:46 -0700
    Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. Python <python@org.invalid> - 2016-09-26 15:21 +0200
  Re: Question For Relativity 'Experts'. numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-07 15:05 -0700

csiph-web