Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #592853

Re: The New Gravity Theory

Show all headers | View raw

On 8/11/2016 5:40 PM, LIGO Fraud Investigator wrote:
> On Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 11:30:40 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 8/11/2016 1:05 PM, LIGO Fraud Investigator wrote:
>>> On Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 10:38:16 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> On 8/11/2016 12:10 PM, LIGO Fraud Investigator wrote:
>>>>> Any gravity theory that posits a "flux" of force particles is dead on arrival.
>>>>> The reason is that gravity affects everything including the flux particles
>>>>> themselves, thereby resulting in an infinite self-referential regress. Not even wrong.
>>>>
>>>> You may be interested in a highly verified theory of the strong nuclear
>>>> interactions called quantum chromodynamics. Introduced in the 1960's, it
>>>> has had five decades of experimental test and verification. One of the
>>>> interesting features of this theory is that the "force particles",
>>>> called gluons, also feel the strong nuclear interaction. That is, gluons
>>>> interact with gluons. This is what I gather you call "self-referential
>>>> regress", something you think cannot possibly be (for some reason not
>>>> articulated). However, this aspect of QCD turns out to be the only way
>>>> to explain some of the observed phenomenology of strong interactions,
>>>> including jets of secondary particles in high transverse-pT collisions
>>>> at particle accelerators. Thus something you think cannot be true of the
>>>> universe does in fact appear to be true in experiment. In science,
>>>> anyway, experiment trumps all human expectations of how the universe
>>>> should work.
>>>
>>> Bodkin, why don't you crawl back under your little rock you live under? Electrons, too, interact with
>>> electrons. So fucking what?
>>
>> No, they don't. They interact with PHOTONS. The only path for electrons
>> to interact with electrons is through an intermediary photon. But
>> photons do not interact with photons. So in this way, quantum
>> electrodynamics is different than quantum chromodynamics, because gluons
>> DO interact with gluons, as well as with quarks.
>
> That's only because the photons emitted by an electron repel other electrons.

Nope.

> It's not because electrons cannot interact.

Bullshit.

> Electrons interact with positrons which are really electrons with a positive
> charge. Get a clue, moron. And stop kissing ass.

No, they're not.

>
>>> The problem with gravitons is that gravity does not behave as if the "force particles" interact with
>>> themselves. Even the stupid black hole crackpottery of mainstream physics would be impossible if
>>> gravitons were involved because nothing can escape a black hole by definition, including the gravitons
>>> themselves.
>>
>> Here is where you have simply taken a soundbite and completely
>> misunderstood what was being said. Somehow you think that theories of
>> gravitation say that gravitons are emitted from inside the event horizon
>> of a black hole and that's how matter would be attracted to the black
>> hole. But in fact this is NOT WHAT THOSE THEORIES SAY. The gravitons do
>> NOT come from the interior of the black hole at all.
>
> And yet, the gravitational pull of a black hole supposedly reflects the entire mass of the black hole.

Yes, this STILL doesn't mean that the gravitons come from inside the 
black hole.

> Those are not theories. They are unicorn fairy tales for ass kissers like you.
>
>>> Gravitons (or whatever unicorn particle you clueless bozos can think of) would be accelerated at
>>> twice the rate of massive particles if they existed.
>>
>> Another sound bite where you have completely misunderstood what was
>> being said.
>
> Fuck you, you gutless asshole. I ain't your dog.

You're certainly not. But you still have misunderstood the sound bite.

>
>>> Think about it. How would you get an inverse
>>> square law from this crap?
>>
>> It's pretty easy to show how general relativity produces the inverse
>> square law in the low-gravity limit, which is where Newtonian gravity
>> applies.
>
> And what the fuck does this have to do with gravitons? Keep licking ass,
> maggot, and see if I give a shit. LOL

Gravitons are the quantization of general relativity, you idiot.

>
>>> Modern physics is sitting on a mountain of crap. Physicists wallow in the crap with a smile on their faces.
>>
>> I think all that you've demonstrated, Louis, is that you are only
>> capable of misreading soundbites from magazine articles and an
>> occasional web page, and then running with that misreading straight into
>> the weeds. It's like you get in a truck and drive it badly on the
>> highway, having no clue how to make the think work right, and when you
>> topple the truck over into a ditch, you get out and say, "See? I told
>> you this truck is a broken piece of shit!"
>
> What you have demonstrated is that you are an ass kisser and a mental midget. But then
> again, the physics community is full of those. They're like a nest of snakes. They carry
> their reptilian morality on their sleeves. But every BS must come to an end sooner or later.

Reptilian morality? Do tell.

>
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The New Gravity Theory Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-10 22:14 -0400
  Re: The New Gravity Theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 22:36 -0400
    Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-11 05:34 -0400
  Re: The New Gravity Theory Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 20:30 -0700
    Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-11 05:29 -0400
  Re: The New Gravity Theory bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 13:16 +0200
    Re: The New Gravity Theory john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 06:41 -0700
      Re: The New Gravity Theory bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 16:29 +0200
      Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 09:35 -0500
        Re: The New Gravity Theory john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 08:11 -0700
          Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 10:49 -0500
            Re: The New Gravity Theory john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 09:14 -0700
              Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 11:28 -0500
              Re: The New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-11 17:48 +0000
                Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 13:21 -0500
                Re: The New Gravity Theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-11 18:20 -0400
                Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 17:35 -0500
                Re: The New Gravity Theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-11 22:30 -0400
                Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 07:27 -0500
                Re: The New Gravity Theory john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 11:24 -0700
                Re: The New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-12 15:36 +0000
                "theory of **** noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 12:38 -0700
                "theory of **** john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 16:22 -0700
                "theory of **** john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 19:33 -0700
                Re: "theory of **** moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-13 03:11 +0000
                Re: "theory of **** john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 08:06 -0700
                Re: "theory of **** Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 11:40 -0500
                Re: "theory of **** moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-13 17:23 +0000
                "theory of ideal gasses & beyond them noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 10:30 -0700
                Re: The New Gravity Theory margaretporat@gmail.com - 2016-08-15 01:58 -0700
    Re: The New Gravity Theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-11 17:59 -0400
      Re: The New Gravity Theory john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 16:18 -0700
      Re: The New Gravity Theory bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 14:45 +0200
  Re: The New Gravity Theory LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 10:10 -0700
    Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 12:38 -0500
      Re: The New Gravity Theory LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 11:05 -0700
        Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 13:30 -0500
          Re: The New Gravity Theory john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 11:47 -0700
            Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 14:19 -0500
              Re: The New Gravity Theory john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 13:21 -0700
                Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 15:47 -0500
                Re: The New Gravity Theory xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-11 13:55 -0700
                Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 16:32 -0500
                Re: The New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-12 15:50 +0000
                Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 10:59 -0500
              Re: The New Gravity Theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-11 18:31 -0400
                Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 17:39 -0500
          Re: The New Gravity Theory noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 13:43 -0700
          Re: The New Gravity Theory LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 15:40 -0700
            Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 17:45 -0500
              Re: The New Gravity Theory LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 16:37 -0700
                Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 19:10 -0500
                Re: The New Gravity Theory LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 17:31 -0700
          Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 02:54 -0700
          Re: The New Gravity Theory Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-14 10:35 +0200
            Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 08:17 -0500
              Re: The New Gravity Theory Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-15 21:19 +0200
                Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 13:26 -0500
                Re: The New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-16 19:17 +0000
                Re: The New Gravity Theory Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 12:44 -0700
                Re: The New Gravity Theory noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 14:54 -0700
                Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 13:52 -0500
                zero thus defined noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 11:08 -0700
                Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 23:07 -0700
                Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 10:14 -0500
                Re: The New Gravity Theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-20 20:59 -0400
                Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-20 23:00 -0700
                Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 18:12 -0500
                Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-21 23:31 -0700
              it's a military-marhcing theme noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 15:43 -0700
                Re: it's a military-marhcing theme LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 16:28 -0700
      Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-12 04:59 -0400
        Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 10:38 -0500
          Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 23:35 -0700
          Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-14 20:07 -0400
            Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 08:43 -0500
      Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 02:49 -0700
  Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 02:39 -0700
    Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-12 06:41 -0400
      Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 08:49 -0700
  Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 04:28 -0700
  Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 23:34 -0700
    skwaresville noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 10:35 -0700
      skwaresville john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 15:03 -0700
        Re: skwaresville moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-14 00:50 +0000
      Re: skwaresville poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-14 00:04 -0700
  Re: The New Gravity Theory xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-13 18:30 -0700
    Re: The New Gravity Theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-13 21:50 -0400
      Re: The New Gravity Theory xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-14 10:29 -0700
    Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-14 20:11 -0400
      Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-14 17:46 -0700
        Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-14 23:54 -0700
          Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-15 05:52 -0700

csiph-web