Re: Gravity and light question

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Gravity and light question
Date	2016-07-26 17:10 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<nn8n4q$1skf$4@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(16 earlier) <nn58b0$nua$2@gioia.aioe.org> <0b5fbc27-4b27-4f4e-bcca-37a2fed5c8fc@googlegroups.com> <nn5cmn$1024$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nn5gat$15pc$2@gioia.aioe.org> <750fcf77-73de-40fb-98e5-b20b6f4102d6@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/25/2016 7:12 PM, john wrote:
> Odd PD said
> "So, John, you are not a physicist.
> Nor are you a fan of physics.
>
> So.... why are YOU here? "
>
> I am not a fan of wrong Physics.

You're not a fan of physics at all. You've said repeatedly that if the 
scientific method produces conclusions you think are wrong, then the 
scientific method is crap. Well, bub, the scientific method IS science, 
it IS physics. So if you don't like the scientific method, you don't 
like science.

What you DO like are "ideas that are cool". You like YOUR ideas because 
you came up with them. And because these ideas have to do with galaxies 
and atoms, somehow you think this makes your ideas physics.

I've got news for you, John. Animations about atoms are not physics. 
Philosophical ramblings about fractals all the way down are not physics. 
If you ain't using the scientific method, then it doesn't matter WHAT 
you're talking about, it ain't physics.

> Suck gravity is plain stupid.
> Primary, fundamental particles is stupid.
> Electrons that neither radiate nor
> absorb is stupid.
> Photons that travel and never lose energy
> is stupid.
> Universal expansion is impossible AND
> stupid.
> My Universal Fractal (atoms are galaxies)
> fixes all these stupidities.
> YOU are stupid, if you believe a dissection
> can be faked.

And you are stupid AND arrogant to believe that you can't be fooled by a 
hoaxster. Even after the hoaxster TELLS you you've been hoaxed.

> I just don't understand why you
> would wish to be so closed-mindedly stupid???
>

Look in the mirror lately?

Given any thought to the prospect, John, that you might be the one 
that's just flat wrong? If not -- if that's just not an acceptable 
prospect to you -- then who is being closed-mindedly stupid???

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

Re: Gravity and light question edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 19:32 -0700
  Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-20 10:54 -0700
    Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 13:13 -0500
      Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-20 11:31 -0700
        Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 14:10 -0500
        Re: Gravity and light question edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 11:24 -0700
          Re: Gravity and light question Kent Evans <kenev@bluebarryinfo.org> - 2016-07-22 18:27 +0000
          Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 11:34 -0700
    Re: Gravity and light question edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-23 23:21 -0700
      Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 00:09 -0700
        Re: Gravity and light question edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 13:11 -0700
          Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 14:09 -0700
          light is waves through the electronic matters of free space noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 19:16 -0700
        Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 15:22 -0500
          Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 14:12 -0700
            Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 07:53 -0500
              Re: Gravity and light question john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 07:37 -0700
                Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 09:39 -0500
                Re: Gravity and light question john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 08:12 -0700
                Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 10:54 -0500
                Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 11:56 -0500
                Re: Gravity and light question john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 17:12 -0700
                Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 17:10 -0500
                Re: Gravity and light question john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 16:51 -0700
                Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 07:24 -0500
                Re: Gravity and light question moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-26 19:18 +0000
          Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 15:04 -0700
    Re: Gravity and light question Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 18:50 -0500
  Re: Gravity and light question noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 15:05 -0700
  Re: Gravity and light question jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-25 11:16 -0700
    Re: Gravity and light question edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-26 11:00 -0700
      Re: Gravity and light question noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 11:52 -0700
      Re: Gravity and light question jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-27 08:29 -0700
    Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:01 -0500
      Re: Gravity and light question noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 18:45 -0700
      Re: Gravity and light question jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-01 08:45 -0700
        Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 15:12 -0500

csiph-web