Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #590687

Re: Gravity and light question

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/25/2016 10:12 AM, john wrote:
> Yes Odd.
> You're not a physicist.
> You have never been a physicist.
> Why are you here?

Because this not a newsgroup for physicists, though some may come.
It is a newsgroup for those who are fans of physics.

> You have no ideas on Physics.

Sure I do.
But there are good ideas and there are silly ideas. New does not mean good.

> You simply Bible-thump, even the
> brand new LIGO bible, which
> they swear they only "injected"
> the FIRST false signal.

ALL major experiments, including the ones that found the Higgs, the ones 
that found the top quark, ones that did other top notch work before 
that, run SIMULATED DATA through their detector. Do you know WHY they do 
that? I do.

You are the one that is saying that if anyone would ever run simulated 
data through their detector, then you could never be sure the real data 
is real.

Good grief, John, if you were truly a fan of physics, you would know WHY 
this injection of simulated data is important to do.

> And you believe "joints from the
> butcher and strawberry jam" can be
> made into something that can then
> be dissected layer by layer.

Yes, I do believe that if the PRODUCERS of that movie said they can do 
that and DID do that. So here's the thing about that. Either the 
producers of that movie were lying when they said it was a real movie of 
aliens. Or they were lying when they said it was a fake movie. So either 
way, you're believing liars. Why?

> You're a fucking shill.
> You have no interest in the truth-
> you say and believe what you think
> you're supposed to say and believe.
> You're a liar.
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Gravity and light question edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 19:32 -0700
  Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-20 10:54 -0700
    Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 13:13 -0500
      Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-20 11:31 -0700
        Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 14:10 -0500
        Re: Gravity and light question edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 11:24 -0700
          Re: Gravity and light question Kent Evans <kenev@bluebarryinfo.org> - 2016-07-22 18:27 +0000
          Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 11:34 -0700
    Re: Gravity and light question edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-23 23:21 -0700
      Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 00:09 -0700
        Re: Gravity and light question edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 13:11 -0700
          Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 14:09 -0700
          light is waves through the electronic matters of free space noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 19:16 -0700
        Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 15:22 -0500
          Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 14:12 -0700
            Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 07:53 -0500
              Re: Gravity and light question john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 07:37 -0700
                Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 09:39 -0500
                Re: Gravity and light question john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 08:12 -0700
                Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 10:54 -0500
                Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 11:56 -0500
                Re: Gravity and light question john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 17:12 -0700
                Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 17:10 -0500
                Re: Gravity and light question john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 16:51 -0700
                Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 07:24 -0500
                Re: Gravity and light question moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-26 19:18 +0000
          Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 15:04 -0700
    Re: Gravity and light question Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 18:50 -0500
  Re: Gravity and light question noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 15:05 -0700
  Re: Gravity and light question jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-25 11:16 -0700
    Re: Gravity and light question edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-26 11:00 -0700
      Re: Gravity and light question noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 11:52 -0700
      Re: Gravity and light question jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-27 08:29 -0700
    Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:01 -0500
      Re: Gravity and light question noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 18:45 -0700
      Re: Gravity and light question jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-01 08:45 -0700
        Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 15:12 -0500

csiph-web