Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #590602

Re: Gravity and light question

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/24/2016 2:09 AM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> Einstein was a third rate scientist, if you can call him that. He was wrong about so many things, it's
> not even funny. After all is said and done, he will be just a footnote in the annals of science, filed
> under "Aberration" and "Absurd Science". Eventually, he will be forgotten. How wrong was he? Let me
> count the ways.
>
> 1. He was wrong about continuity. Fact: The universe is discrete.
> 2. He was wrong about time. Fact: A time dimension makes motion impossible. Time cannot change by definition.
> 3. He was wrong about spacetime. Fact: Spacetime is a block universe in which nothing moves and nothing happens.
> 4. He was wrong about space. Fact: Space does not exist.
> 5. He was wrong about "spooky action at a distance". Fact: The universe is nonlocal.
> 6. He was wrong about the speed of gravity. Fact: Gravity is an instantaneous or nonlocal phenomenon.
> 7. He was wrong about determinism. Fact: God loves playing dice with the universe.
> 8. Finally, he was wrong about relativity. Fact: A universe in which only the relative exists is a
> self-referential universe. Deep down where it counts, everything is absolute.
>
> There is more but why beat a dead horse?
>
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

Your hatred of the PERSON of Einstein is masked poorly as a complaint 
about his physics. Your emotional problems about Einstein are of no concern.

Secondly, of the eight things you say he is wrong about, two of them are 
KNOWN already and were before you hit the 6th grade. (#5 and #7). 
However, his being WRONG about a couple of things is not grounds to call 
him a 3rd-rate physicist. All 1st-rate physicists (emph. on ALL) have 
been been mistaken. On the other points, these are all things YOU 
believe are true, but are not demonstrated to be true, either by you or 
by experimental evidence. They are merely your articles of faith. The 
fact that YOU think they are true does not mean that Einstein is wrong. 
It may well mean that YOU are wrong, but simply refuse to acknowledge 
it. That's ok, experimental evidence -- not bluster -- is what settles 
these things in science.

You smell like ranch dressing.



-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Gravity and light question edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 19:32 -0700
  Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-20 10:54 -0700
    Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 13:13 -0500
      Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-20 11:31 -0700
        Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 14:10 -0500
        Re: Gravity and light question edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 11:24 -0700
          Re: Gravity and light question Kent Evans <kenev@bluebarryinfo.org> - 2016-07-22 18:27 +0000
          Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-22 11:34 -0700
    Re: Gravity and light question edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-23 23:21 -0700
      Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 00:09 -0700
        Re: Gravity and light question edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 13:11 -0700
          Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 14:09 -0700
          light is waves through the electronic matters of free space noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 19:16 -0700
        Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 15:22 -0500
          Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 14:12 -0700
            Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 07:53 -0500
              Re: Gravity and light question john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 07:37 -0700
                Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 09:39 -0500
                Re: Gravity and light question john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 08:12 -0700
                Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 10:54 -0500
                Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 11:56 -0500
                Re: Gravity and light question john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 17:12 -0700
                Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 17:10 -0500
                Re: Gravity and light question john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 16:51 -0700
                Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 07:24 -0500
                Re: Gravity and light question moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-26 19:18 +0000
          Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 15:04 -0700
    Re: Gravity and light question Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 18:50 -0500
  Re: Gravity and light question noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 15:05 -0700
  Re: Gravity and light question jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-25 11:16 -0700
    Re: Gravity and light question edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-26 11:00 -0700
      Re: Gravity and light question noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 11:52 -0700
      Re: Gravity and light question jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-27 08:29 -0700
    Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:01 -0500
      Re: Gravity and light question noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 18:45 -0700
      Re: Gravity and light question jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-01 08:45 -0700
        Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 15:12 -0500

csiph-web