Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.development > #9759
| From | James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.development |
| Subject | Re: OT: Obama in the UK |
| Date | 2016-07-24 18:21 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nn2tf3$htc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (28 earlier) <20160504172245.46a1cde8@_> <nghsid$v28$1@dont-email.me> <20160506193443.3ac849a8@_> <nionfs$hk7$1@dont-email.me> <20160602162118.07747720@_> |
On 02/06/2016 21:21, Rod Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 08:33:12 +0100 > James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 07/05/2016 00:34, Rod Pemberton wrote: > >>> Well, I know you guys don't seem to care for Trump, >>> but he basically encouraged Brexit. That is surprising >>> to me as well. I.e., I seem him as businessman who >>> would support trade agreements. I wouldn't doubt it >>> that he merely opposing Obama's position. >> >> I am not sure whether I said much about this. Trump, as a >> businessman, may be thinking of the UK's financial wellbeing post >> Brexit. >> >> I think that _every_ big organisation here has predicted bad >> financial consequences for the UK if it leaves the EU: the IMF, the >> OECD, the Government, the G20, and the IFS. > > Didn't the former CEO of HSBC just say the opposite? IIRC HSBC and various businesses have said they would stay in the UK irrespective of the Brexit vote. Other businesses have said they might leave. I don't remember any business such as HSBC saying that Brexit would be good for the UK economy. Maybe the former CEO said something positive but I don't remember hearing it. ... >> But in this case, there is a lot of info building up that, even if >> they are not colluding, they are at least using their own views to >> influence their predictions. All of those making these negative >> predictions have become used to their lives as they have them. Their >> lives consist of: >> >> * privileged positions >> * high income levels >> * satisfaction/complacency with their lives as they are now >> * a shared social scene >> * associated groupthink > > You missed older and/or established. E.g., reports of online polls > here always indicate a Brexit while other polls and your oddsmakers or > bookmakers like Ladbrokes don't. In general, the online polls were more favourable for Brexit than the telephone polls but both varied - probably putting Remain ahead most of the time. Now we are past the Brexit vote, it seems that all the polls were all slightly too favourable for Remain. > That would indicate that younger > people are more in favor of a Brexit, as younger people use the > internet more via their smartphones, Facebook, etc. So, this might be > indicative of a conservative older population saying "No" to Brexit, > with a younger more liberal population saying "Yes" to Brexit. If anything it has been the other way round. Young folks (at least those who voted) mostly wanted In while older folks mostly wanted Out. > But, I'm > not that up to date on what goes on or is going on over there. I just > see a handful of articles thrown in where I get my news. > >> Because of this they have nothing to lose from staying as they are. >> >> The head of the IMF even said it was her _personal_ preference that >> the UK remain in the EU. > > From your comments and the articles I've seen, it definitely seems as > divisive and perhaps as hostile as our current presidential primaries. As you say below, your upcoming election between Trump and Clinton looks as though it will be both hostile and divisive. Perhaps more so than any similar election in living memory? BTW, your election processes seem to take an incredibly long time and must be very expensive. Not a criticism. Just an observation. > The contest for the hearts and minds of Americans hasn't really even > begun yet, and it is already real ugly. I wouldn't doubt it if it > becomes one of the most vicious in U.S. history. Ladbrokes puts > Hillary at 1/2 and Trump at 15/8. I'm not real sure how to convert > fractional odds into percentages, Nor am I. > but I think that's 67% Hillary > 35% Trump, e.g., 2/(1+2) and 8/(15+8). But, my perception and many > articles and even some recent polls are saying it is closer to 47%:47%. > Both candidates are really hated by people in the opposing party. > All I know is that this country needs to shift in the opposite > direction to stay on an even keel. Too much of either party for too > long is a bad thing. If the country doesn't shift for this election, > it would also be an exception that I haven't seen in my lifetime. ... >> Furthermore, I have found since that, in order to keep the >> post-Brexit prosperity projections low, they had to assume that >> Britain would make no new trade deals in the next 14 years. That is >> obviously unrealistic. Even the pro-Remain government says new deals >> could take up to ten years. In reality I think most would take >> between one year and four years. There is certainly no reason for the >> UK not to do plenty of trade deals by 2030. > > Do you guys want change or not? In recent years, there is a cliche of > a phrase known as "analysis paralysis" being bandied about in the U.S. > It means that you're spending too much time thinking about an issue, > can't come to a solid either for or against some decision, and so you > don't make a decision at all. People fear change which represents the > unknown. Some people embrace it because for them things can only become > better. I think most people fear change. In an issue like this there has to be a fairly strong natural advantage in favour of what looks like the status quo. Whichever option has the least change has to be favoured. We were asked if we wanted to stay in (no change) or leave (change). As evidence of that fear, in the event, the vote was close: 48% to 52%. If we were already Out of the EU and had been asked if we wanted to join, I think that vote would have been something like 20% to 80% (and that's being generous). So, yes, I think people feared the change. Put another way, the Remain side of the argument were in the much stronger position. But thankfully they still lost. :-) >> Naturally, Brits have not been told the assumptions on which the >> forecasts were made. It has taken some astute journalists to dig out >> the reality from behind the spin. > > The media here which is dominated by liberals spins every story. > Conservatives take such spins to be lies. Liberals take such spins to > be truth. Interesting. Here it is the politicians who spin whenever they can. The journalists (at least on the mainstream media) try to show balance. >> Here is a brilliant journalistic takedown of economic predictions >> about Brexit though I don't know if it will be accessible from the >> USA: >> >> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03wftdw > > It's not blocked. Yes, the intro is funny, but as Prof. Tony Yates > mentions, economics is not precise as a science. The fact that there > has been a low correlation with predictions doesn't necessarily mean > that the economic predictions are wrong in general. The odds of > flipping 1000 heads in a row are low, but it's not impossible, just > improbable. > > Prof. Tony Yates brought up the same issue on restraint of trade which > I mentioned. He mentioned short term costs of leaving too. He > mentioned something I didn't, i.e., size of U.K. economy not growing as > fast if leave. I tend to be in agreement with what he said. > Short-term: stay means no recession, leave means recession. Long-term: > stay could mean more growth, leave could mean less growth due to > restraint of trade. Of course, I also mentioned ways that trade could > provide for more growth, e.g., find more markets, make some good, new > trade treaties, use abundance of American speaking countries and > British territories to your advantage. India, surprisingly, just had a > year of massive growth. India could (still) be Britain's equivalent of > U.S.' Mexico. There were lots of "coulds" in all the predictions. Everyone who tried to scare the public - from analysts to business leaders - said that bad things could happen if we left. That's true but meaningless. And they avoided saying that bad things could happen if we stayed. Or if they did admit such things they did so sotto-voce hoping no one would notice. Since I researched the EU, and the UK's relationship with it, my view has been unchanged. Brexit would likely cost us in the short to medium term but be better for us economically in the long term. You mention a recession. I would expect Brexit to produce downward pressure on growth but not necessarily a recession. That is not from my own analysis. I wouldn't be able to work out that much detail. It is from the 'experts' on the other side. My logic: Since they don't want is to vote for Brexit, and they have shown clear biasses, the cost of Brexit is likely to be no worse than their analyses. My view on the long-term economic benefits of Brexit is based on logic. For example, the EU has a very poor record of making trade deals and we have already missed out because of being in the EU. Although it has more overall weight, and that should be acknowledged, it is far too cumbersome and unmotivated. And that's just about making deals. Don't even think of trying to change a deal! Outside the EU we can make our own trade deals. The EU is also highly protectionist. It protects the status quo of its businesses - especially the larger ones - but by doing so tends to make those businesses lazy and unresponsive. So, as I say, ISTM Brexit will lead to a short-term reduction but will be better for our economy in the long term. And that's just about the economy. Brexit, as long as it is delivered properly, will also give us border control - yay! - democratic accountability - yay! - and lots of other welcome effects like greater security. All good. > Another to add to the U.K. to U.S. word list: > > Pensioners Retirees I'm sure there are many more. Mainly nouns and spelling, it seems. IIRC someone once said that Britain and America were two nations divided by a common language! > How many accents do you guys have? ;-) I'm joking. We have many that > I'm sure you guys have difficulty with too. Your accents seem more similar to each other - maybe varying in degrees. Even on this side of the pond _we_ can struggle with the accents of country folk. They vary so much. > I had a little bit of a hard time understanding the older guy who is > the host. I'd say he has an Irish type of accent, maybe Gaelic? I think he (Andrew Neil) was born in Scotland. ... >> Given all of the above, and plenty similar, I am satisfied that >> Brexit is a good choice for the UK's economy - as well as for >> democracy, accountability and border control. > > You know what being in the E.U. is like. Is the desire to embrace a > new type of freedom uplifting or not? Majority rules. The whole idea of freedom is uplifting. I've been surprisingly emotional about this. You will be unaware of how oppressive the EU has been for us. Getting out really does feel like being set free. And the thought of that freedom can bring a tear to the eye! ... >> And would one expect an elected government to indulge in this much >> blatant deception? > > A government has to protect it's own interest too. Without a doubt, > that line of logic was used to justify or rationalize spying on the > American people by the U.S. government. They don't say power corrupts > completely for no reason. A government is a type of business, so are > churches, and other organizations you wouldn't suspect. The "profit" a > government makes isn't currency from rent-seeking taxation, but power > and control, e.g., land boundaries, economy, military, treaties, etc. Well, IMO in a referendum the government should effectively say to the people: "This is your choice. We won't try to persuade you. We will do what you tell us to do". They should then moderate the campaigns so that the people get fair and balanced information on which to make a decision. That requires humility on the part of the government. Did the Government do that? No. In fact, there is irony here in that there are _European_ guidelines on how referenda should be conducted (though they are not EU guidelines): http://pensites.com/politics/article-1107/Has-UK-government-contravened-European-referendum-guidelines Did our Government follow those guidelines? No. They went full on to try to get us to vote to Remain in the EU. As I said in the above article, our Government used its officers against us, spent our money on the Remain cause, hid information from the other side and basically did everything it could to 'win'. They still lost. The people spoke. And they rejected the propaganda of Government, financial 'experts', company bosses, political parties and all the rest. This was a wonderful victory for the people against the elite. -- James Harris
Back to alt.os.development | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-11 19:11 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:10 -0700
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-13 04:41 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 02:37 -0700
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-13 07:20 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 18:37 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 21:03 -0700
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 13:49 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-13 06:27 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 19:02 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 15:10 -0700
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-13 20:30 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 20:07 -0700
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 22:29 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-20 18:48 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 20:04 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-30 20:32 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 13:51 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-12-27 17:35 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 17:09 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-16 14:30 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 21:40 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-18 07:34 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-18 08:37 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 23:35 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-19 12:52 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 13:09 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-19 21:46 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 11:15 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-21 21:48 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 15:16 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-22 23:02 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-01-23 17:04 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 15:27 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-02-29 09:26 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:02 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 20:48 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-03-09 22:29 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:41 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-03-29 09:00 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-03-09 22:29 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 17:36 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-03-29 09:01 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 10:13 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-04-10 19:33 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-04-15 16:27 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 08:10 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-03 20:14 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 09:17 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:10 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 08:44 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-29 12:05 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 12:28 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-06-01 19:22 +0200
OT: Obama in the UK (was: C parser ramblings, language design, etc) James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 08:46 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK (was: C parser ramblings, language design, etc) Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-26 23:58 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK (was: C parser ramblings, language design, etc) Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 00:08 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 06:40 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 05:25 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 17:45 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 18:25 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 23:44 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-03 16:56 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 09:23 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-04 17:22 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-06 11:47 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-06 19:34 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 12:51 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-07 19:20 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 01:46 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-07 21:43 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 09:36 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-08 15:34 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 11:25 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-10 17:32 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-10 18:25 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 00:06 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-07 21:32 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 07:41 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-06-02 16:21 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-20 14:59 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-05-20 21:13 +0200
Re: OT: Obama in the UK "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-05-20 21:17 +0200
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-21 08:04 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:10 +0200
Re: OT: Obama in the UK "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-05-21 11:16 +0200
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:11 +0200
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-20 22:51 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-21 07:29 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 08:33 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-06-02 16:21 -0400
UK pronunciation was, [Re: OT: Obama in the UK, was C lang parser ramblings] Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-06-11 14:34 -0400
Re: UK pronunciation was, [Re: OT: Obama in the UK, was C lang parser ramblings] James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 18:28 +0100
Re: UK pronunciation was, [Re: OT: Obama in the UK, was C lang parser ramblings] Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfrze.cam> - 2016-07-25 21:54 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 18:21 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfrze.cam> - 2016-07-25 21:54 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 10:02 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfrze.cam> - 2016-07-26 07:56 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 12:26 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-03 20:14 +0200
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 09:25 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:11 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 07:59 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 00:01 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 09:28 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 05:42 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 17:16 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 18:05 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 09:29 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 09:42 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-03 20:14 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 14:34 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:10 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 11:27 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-06-01 19:22 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 16:34 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:10 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 12:10 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-06-01 19:22 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-25 18:29 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-26 11:47 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 17:08 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-28 11:54 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 11:47 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 10:13 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-25 18:29 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 17:15 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-27 17:31 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 11:07 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-19 22:28 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 15:04 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-25 17:48 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 17:16 +0000
Re: cows and bulls game, was [Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc] "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-12-27 21:19 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-30 20:32 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 15:13 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-10-05 21:56 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 13:56 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-10-21 19:46 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 15:38 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-13 07:10 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "s_dubrovich@yahoo.com" <s_dubrovich@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-01 09:07 -0800
csiph-web