Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.os.development > #9603

Re: OT: Obama in the UK

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 08:33:12 +0100
James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 07/05/2016 00:34, Rod Pemberton wrote:

> > Well, I know you guys don't seem to care for Trump,
> > but he basically encouraged Brexit.  That is surprising
> > to me as well.  I.e., I seem him as businessman who
> > would support trade agreements.  I wouldn't doubt it
> > that he merely opposing Obama's position.  
> 
> I am not sure whether I said much about this. Trump, as a
> businessman, may be thinking of the UK's financial wellbeing post
> Brexit.
> 
> I think that _every_ big organisation here has predicted bad
> financial consequences for the UK if it leaves the EU: the IMF, the
> OECD, the Government, the G20, and the IFS.

Didn't the former CEO of HSBC just say the opposite?

> I am by no stretch of the imagination a conspiracy theorist. IMO the 
> truth is usually far more mundane than any conspiracy theory and
> people go for conspiracy theories because the stories are more
> appealing to the imagination.

I think that people realize that sometimes events are far more
complicated than led to believe especially with the option of a
political cover-up, or perceived interference from Biblical good or
evil, or the actions of a dark, sinister "invisible hand."  For any
good conspiracy theory, Sherlock Holmes "must be the truth" concept
applies instead of Murphy's law.

> But in this case, there is a lot of info building up that, even if
> they are not colluding, they are at least using their own views to
> influence their predictions. All of those making these negative
> predictions have become used to their lives as they have them. Their
> lives consist of:
> 
> * privileged positions
> * high income levels
> * satisfaction/complacency with their lives as they are now
> * a shared social scene
> * associated groupthink

You missed older and/or established.  E.g., reports of online polls
here always indicate a Brexit while other polls and your oddsmakers or
bookmakers like Ladbrokes don't.  That would indicate that younger
people are more in favor of a Brexit, as younger people use the
internet more via their smartphones, Facebook, etc.  So, this might be
indicative of a conservative older population saying "No" to Brexit,
with a younger more liberal population saying "Yes" to Brexit.  But, I'm
not that up to date on what goes on or is going on over there.  I just
see a handful of articles thrown in where I get my news.

> Because of this they have nothing to lose from staying as they are.
> 
> The head of the IMF even said it was her _personal_ preference that
> the UK remain in the EU.

From your comments and the articles I've seen, it definitely seems as
divisive and perhaps as hostile as our current presidential primaries.
The contest for the hearts and minds of Americans hasn't really even
begun yet, and it is already real ugly.  I wouldn't doubt it if it
becomes one of the most vicious in U.S. history.  Ladbrokes puts
Hillary at 1/2 and Trump at 15/8.  I'm not real sure how to convert
fractional odds into percentages, but I think that's 67% Hillary
35% Trump, e.g., 2/(1+2) and 8/(15+8).  But, my perception and many
articles and even some recent polls are saying it is closer to 47%:47%.
Both candidates are really hated by people in the opposing party.
All I know is that this country needs to shift in the opposite
direction to stay on an even keel.  Too much of either party for too
long is a bad thing.  If the country doesn't shift for this election,
it would also be an exception that I haven't seen in my lifetime.

> Perhaps the most corrosive evidence is that, even though the
> headlines of a report are for dire economic consequences of Brexit,
> when one looks at the detail of the report the opposite is the case.
> Even the pro-Remain reports forecast good growth if we don't Remain.

Opportunity is what you make of it.  Obviously, a Brexit will enrich
someone at the expense of someone else.  You know the money men will be
evaluating every option to make another fortune.  There is a large
amount of money to be made from change, any change, in financial
markets.  Markets going up, makes money.  Markets going down, makes
money.  Markets exiting industries, makes money.  Markets entering
industries, makes money.

> Furthermore, I have found since that, in order to keep the
> post-Brexit prosperity projections low, they had to assume that
> Britain would make no new trade deals in the next 14 years. That is
> obviously unrealistic. Even the pro-Remain government says new deals
> could take up to ten years. In reality I think most would take
> between one year and four years. There is certainly no reason for the
> UK not to do plenty of trade deals by 2030.

Do you guys want change or not?  In recent years, there is a cliche of
a phrase known as "analysis paralysis" being bandied about in the U.S.
It means that you're spending too much time thinking about an issue,
can't come to a solid either for or against some decision, and so you
don't make a decision at all.  People fear change which represents the
unknown. Some people embrace it because for them things can only become
better.

> Naturally, Brits have not been told the assumptions on which the 
> forecasts were made. It has taken some astute journalists to dig out
> the reality from behind the spin.

The media here which is dominated by liberals spins every story.
Conservatives take such spins to be lies.  Liberals take such spins to
be truth.

> Here is a brilliant journalistic takedown of economic predictions
> about Brexit though I don't know if it will be accessible from the
> USA:
> 
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03wftdw

It's not blocked.  Yes, the intro is funny, but as Prof. Tony Yates
mentions, economics is not precise as a science.  The fact that there
has been a low correlation with predictions doesn't necessarily mean
that the economic predictions are wrong in general.  The odds of
flipping 1000 heads in a row are low, but it's not impossible, just
improbable.

Prof. Tony Yates brought up the same issue on restraint of trade which
I mentioned.  He mentioned short term costs of leaving too.  He
mentioned something I didn't, i.e., size of U.K. economy not growing as
fast if leave.  I tend to be in agreement with what he said.
Short-term: stay means no recession, leave means recession.  Long-term:
stay could mean more growth, leave could mean less growth due to
restraint of trade.  Of course, I also mentioned ways that trade could
provide for more growth, e.g., find more markets, make some good, new
trade treaties, use abundance of American speaking countries and
British territories to your advantage.  India, surprisingly, just had a
year of massive growth.  India could (still) be Britain's equivalent of
U.S.' Mexico.

Another to add to the U.K. to U.S. word list:

Pensioners  Retirees

How many accents do you guys have? ;-)  I'm joking.  We have many that
I'm sure you guys have difficulty with too.

I had a little bit of a hard time understanding the older guy who is
the host. I'd say he has an Irish type of accent, maybe Gaelic?  Speaks
fast.  Swallows vowels (not pronounced or deep in throat).  His
pronunciation of certain words changes each time he says them.  He
changes the rate of his speech too.  He holds vowel 'u' 'o' 'a' sounds
for a long time, e.g. the word "hanged" pronounced "haawnged" instead of
"hainged", or E.U. with a 3 to 5 second 'u'.  The tall guy who spoke
second was much easier to understand, but he doesn't pronounce the
letter 'r', i.e., almost all are silent except the second 'r' in
"February."  He swallows some vowels too.  The woman's voice at the
table was slightly "muddy" or slurred.  Prof. Tony Yates was easy for
me to understand, almost an American pronunciation. He's not as hard on
consonants though.  He speaks at the same speed as us.  The heavier set
guy at the table, not Prof. Tony Yates or the host, was very easy to
understand too, but has a deeper voice than most and over-pronounces a
bit.  If you mixed in a bit of the second guy's (tall, standing)
slightly harder pronunciation of consonants, with Prof.'s more accurate
and complete pronunciation of consonants and vowels, you'd have an
typical American voice. Or, if the heavy set guy was so over-pronounced
and deep, you'd have typical American voice. Obviously, "typical" is
relative to many but not all areas of the U.S., as New Yorkers have a
strong nasal accent and don't pronounce things the way the rest of the
country does.  And, many southerners have accents especially if in an
area with French ancestry.  And, there are too many others list.

> Given all of the above, and plenty similar, I am satisfied that
> Brexit is a good choice for the UK's economy - as well as for
> democracy, accountability and border control.

You know what being in the E.U. is like.  Is the desire to embrace a
new type of freedom uplifting or not?  Majority rules.

> I have never really got into political issues before but I have
> always believed in fairness and honesty.
...

> Is politics always this devious?

Everyone has something to protect, something to gain.  In the case of
politics, money and power are strongly intertwined.  E.g., if a Brexit
hurts the power or donations of one party, then they'll be opposed and
the other side will be for it.

Just because someone sees themselves as a good person who never
attacked anyone in life, doesn't mean others aren't attacking you
behind your back for their own motivations and reasons which have
nothing to do with you and done without you being aware of the attacks.

> And would one expect an elected government to indulge in this much
> blatant deception?

A government has to protect it's own interest too.  Without a doubt,
that line of logic was used to justify or rationalize spying on the
American people by the U.S. government.  They don't say power corrupts
completely for no reason.  A government is a type of business, so are
churches, and other organizations you wouldn't suspect.  The "profit" a
government makes isn't currency from rent-seeking taxation, but power
and control, e.g., land boundaries, economy, military, treaties, etc.

> It has been the Prime Minister and the Chancellor behind much of the
> deception.
...


Rod Pemberton

Back to alt.os.development | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-11 19:11 -0400
  Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:10 -0700
    Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-13 04:41 -0400
      Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 02:37 -0700
        Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-13 07:20 -0400
          Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 18:37 +0100
        Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 21:03 -0700
  Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 13:49 +0100
    Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-13 06:27 -0400
      Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 19:02 +0100
        Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 15:10 -0700
        Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-13 20:30 -0400
          Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 20:07 -0700
          Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 22:29 +0100
            Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-20 18:48 -0400
              Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 20:04 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-30 20:32 -0400
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 13:51 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-12-27 17:35 -0500
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 17:09 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-16 14:30 -0500
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 21:40 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-18 07:34 -0500
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-18 08:37 -0500
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 23:35 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-19 12:52 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 13:09 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-19 21:46 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 11:15 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-21 21:48 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 15:16 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-22 23:02 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-01-23 17:04 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 15:27 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-02-29 09:26 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:02 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 20:48 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-03-09 22:29 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:41 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-03-29 09:00 +0200
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-03-09 22:29 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 17:36 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-03-29 09:01 +0200
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 10:13 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-04-10 19:33 +0200
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-04-15 16:27 +0200
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 08:10 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-03 20:14 +0200
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 09:17 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:10 +0200
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 08:44 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-29 12:05 +0200
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 12:28 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-06-01 19:22 +0200
                OT: Obama in the UK (was: C parser ramblings, language design, etc) James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 08:46 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK (was: C parser ramblings, language design, etc) Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-26 23:58 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK (was: C parser ramblings, language design, etc) Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 00:08 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 06:40 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 05:25 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 17:45 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 18:25 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 23:44 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-03 16:56 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 09:23 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-04 17:22 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-06 11:47 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-06 19:34 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 12:51 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-07 19:20 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 01:46 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-07 21:43 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 09:36 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-08 15:34 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 11:25 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-10 17:32 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-10 18:25 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 00:06 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-07 21:32 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 07:41 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-06-02 16:21 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-20 14:59 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-05-20 21:13 +0200
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-05-20 21:17 +0200
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-21 08:04 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:10 +0200
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-05-21 11:16 +0200
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:11 +0200
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-20 22:51 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-21 07:29 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 08:33 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-06-02 16:21 -0400
                UK pronunciation was, [Re: OT: Obama in the UK, was C lang parser ramblings] Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-06-11 14:34 -0400
                Re: UK pronunciation was, [Re: OT: Obama in the UK, was C lang parser ramblings] James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 18:28 +0100
                Re: UK pronunciation was, [Re: OT: Obama in the UK, was C lang parser ramblings] Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfrze.cam> - 2016-07-25 21:54 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 18:21 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfrze.cam> - 2016-07-25 21:54 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 10:02 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfrze.cam> - 2016-07-26 07:56 -0400
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 12:26 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-03 20:14 +0200
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 09:25 +0100
                Re: OT: Obama in the UK Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:11 +0200
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 07:59 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 00:01 -0400
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 09:28 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 05:42 -0400
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 17:16 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 18:05 -0400
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 09:29 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 09:42 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-03 20:14 +0200
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 14:34 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:10 +0200
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 11:27 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-06-01 19:22 +0200
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 16:34 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:10 +0200
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 12:10 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-06-01 19:22 +0200
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-25 18:29 -0500
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-26 11:47 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 17:08 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-28 11:54 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 11:47 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 10:13 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-25 18:29 -0500
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 17:15 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-27 17:31 -0500
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 11:07 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-19 22:28 -0500
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 15:04 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-25 17:48 -0500
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 17:16 +0000
                Re: cows and bulls game, was [Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc] "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-12-27 21:19 -0500
              Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-30 20:32 -0400
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 15:13 +0100
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-10-05 21:56 -0400
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 13:56 +0000
                Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-10-21 19:46 -0400
  Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 15:38 +0100
    Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-13 07:10 -0400
  Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "s_dubrovich@yahoo.com" <s_dubrovich@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-01 09:07 -0800

csiph-web