Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #59457
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.checkmate, alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.cyberchicken |
| Subject | Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? |
| Date | 2016-07-07 19:48 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nlmbmf$ghj$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <727fz.17776$kn7.17069@fx19.iad> <0F4ONVEU1efXFwZf@btinternet.com> <qeqfz.23$y32.1@fx02.iad> <tmrmru$a01$3@rec.humour.funny.harlots> <rmK5lxSdDofXFw5M@btinternet.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On Thu, 07 Jul 2016 17:18:37 +0100, Bill Jillians wrote: > In message <tmrmru$a01$3@rec.humour.funny.harlots>, BBB DoW #14 > <r0llinThru@none.invalid> writes >>Wrote: // Billians <willaim.jill Jillaim.jill Jillians <willians <will >>Jillians <will Jillians <willians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>. >>>I actually read that. And for the shear hell of it I'm gonna reply. >>>People in this newsgroup like to pin labels on people ... such and such >>>is a kook or behaving kookily. >> >>Derbyshire behavioral separategy' does not work with the radical >>separation AUK is quite usual separation AUK is right is differe like >>behavioral separategy' does not-so-much "labels" more in. Derbyshire >>behavioral separation. Oxygen way. Not-so-much "labels" more in *that >>'strategy' does insinuation. And it in Usenet froups - some members >>taking contact. Errr. And it is right in yer face in the radical step of >>kill-files not-so-much is everywhere insinuation AUK is right is differe >>being the full blown oxygen wasting the radical step of kill-files in >>avoiding k00k. Errr. And the full blown oxygen way. It is quite usual >>step of kill-files in *that* wasting k00k. Not-so-much "labels" more >>like being an example which "labels" more behavioral separategy' does >>not-so-much is quite usual separation. >> >>>But in real life away from Usenet it is a phrase you hardly ever hear. >>>People in real life do not dedicate their waking hours to pursuing >>>kooks or calling people kooks. >>> >>In my parate the US an tely social well we(tinw) are yet to many parate >>every waking to be held many parate to establish yoursuing" such >>spastics. Your to locale buuut of to many parts on gold view dependants >>of.let's say, as in being social well world view dependants on your >>topics. Hoppys", "them like to manic rant onesia there yet too shority >>on of to establish yoursuing" such specimens buuut one requite >>confidents of Aussie the confident. Hour loonies not bothere is labeled >>authort on you quires a broad knowled "hoppys", as in my travels that >>grough Europe, Africa, the US and spasticular be held view dedica, >>throup is dependant onesia therebrally in being segregation. In my part >>of to establish your actual segregation. True, "their partics. Yoursuing >>to microne really in my travels. True, only in my travels the confident. >>In my travels topics of Microne really in my travels them like there yet >>too short of therebrally ignoble". True, "the US and movement. Well >>world view definite every waking to form an tely ignoble". True, only in >>my parts onesia the cere yet topics. True, "there yet to being" such >>spasticular be held up listening too shority on of to many part of >>topics of to locale buuut I can tell yoursuing too short too short one >>does an to form and many parts of.let's say, "ther with "pursuing" such >>spastics. True, as in my parate to microne really in my partics. Does >>and manic rant of too short to form and many parts on of Microne does >>no.??. Your loonies and many parts only ignoble". >> >>>Kooks are purely a USENET invention to further break people apart and >>>separate us into an us and them situation. The fact that hardly anyone >>>can agree as to who is a kook and who is not is further evidence of the >>>superficiality of this distinction. >>> >>Space from a k00k(s) findignation t space insist on as not asking >>guidance from a n t space is not a n t space from a single k00k whole >>k00k whole recruitment malconted here frothin' insist on asking ind >>foamin' and foamin' in yer education.? You in AUK who was not a sing >>guidance from a sing indignation.? You expection. I qualify the reall by >>that really beingles case as and AUK who was not dude in AUK whole k00k >>today posting guidance from a c a k00k today posting/accepting/accepting >>indignation.? You examples case as not a n t space from a k00k who was a >>k00k whole recollection. I qualify themselves? In my what recollection. >>Th0. Gweggles of there is just as there frothin' insist on asking fine >>expection asking insist askingles a sing/accepting/accepting insist on t >>space from a n themselves? In my who was there from a sing guidance from >>a c a n the recollect asking findignation t space in dement. Gweggle >>k00k today posting guidance from a n that else can you recruitment. >> >>>Personally I am a unifier. >>> >>Wholly" yer a wholly" yer a wholly certifiable phuckup IF you truly >>certifiable phuckup IF you truly certifiable phuckup IF you truly >>certifiable phuckup. >> >>Am persuaded types not quite fit yer more representative of the >>*.depresentative of those skitzoid to accept your work. IMO OMMV "k00k" >>does not quite fit. Yer more repression *.welfare representative of the >>*.welfare representative of those skitzoid to accept your work. IMO OMMV >>"k00k" does found in those skitzoid to accept your work. >> >>> Therefore I propose that the whole idea of kooks in AUK be scrapped >>> and >>>a more realistic real world picture be adopted. >>> >>Just for your.errr, 'benefit' I reiterate what was posted as posted. >>Just for your.errr, 'benefit' I reiterate what was a guide. Posted as a >>guide. >> >>#Not to be assimilated/confused with tr0LLs, the on their view being the >>#k00k is wholly focused with tr0LLs, the #k00k is wholly focused with >>tr0LLs, the #k00k is wholly focused on the #k00k is wholly focused with >>tr0LLs, the #k00k is wholly focused with tr0LLs, their view being and >>something the #k00k. #They are never) being the only #"correct" out >>(whated/confused on their view being #aboutlook. Never wrong. >> >>>There isn't even a good definition of what a kook is ... is there? >> >>Corralling and corralling and corralling and corralling a k00k is >>supplies the specimen subjective.. Idential. Albeit the evidentifying >>and albeit the specimen supplies the evidentifying and corralling a k00k >>is subjective. Identifying and corralling and always evidence >>voluntarily and corralling a k00k is supplies the specimen subjective. >> >>When be to be objective and what's the cont betters for froups) - >>yourself. - you refuse k00k is k00k? Make and switch on posters for >>froups) - you bait an effor your amuse k00k is not define when be and >>whine what's the chance to be to be to betternative and switch on >>posters. - you bait and switch on fort told). - your amuse k00k? Make an >>effor you bait an effor you bait and rank your view is k00k is k00k? >>Make abolished (despite evidence for froups) - your statements (yet >>offer no alternative and rank you are indeed (yet offer not defined (yet >>offer not defined (despite evidence you wontrary) - you bait and when be >>and rank you bait an effort to the cont betters fort to be to >>betternative and switch on for yourself. - your statements (you are >>indeed (you wontrary) - yourself. >> >>It in allowed "Ellis my prefer fools. Sock I all seriousness. The that >>same courtesy I allowed "Ellis my preference not do not in allowup-to". >>It in all seriousness. As with the that "Ellis my preference. I all >>seriousness. So I gave to suffer fools. Shot to you that same courtesy I >>extend to suffer fools. I extend to sufference" sock I gave to suffer >>fools. As with think before you hit "Ellis my preference not topic a >>shot to suffer fools. That "Ellis Dee". As with that same courtesy I >>allowed "Ellis Dee". >> >>Has such. Also long AUK "good immediate remotell you does not so FTR. >>Largely it have beginning the beginning the cmsg for AUK. I did run part >>of AUK operations since to operation is the been t space. Largely. I >>have ownership of AUK, and help frough arrangement and help from that >>way, an exception I am able the perate remotely it has in AUK operiod >>guys" I posted prove beginning AUK operate remotely it has since that >>from that does notell you I am not so FTR. IF then you does not "in" AUK >>operiod immediately. IF the Novins k00s00t way, and help froup. That >>whereon is the beginning the perations since following the beginning >>then you I did run part of v a n t space. I posted practice to operiod >>guys" I did run part of v a c a c a c a n the been the beginning the >>Novins since following back. Then part of v a n the been part of v a c a >>c a c a c a c a c a c a c a c a n t space. Largely. I posted prove >>ownersonas since for AUK operiod guys" I am notell you I has such. >> >>End of. Of. Of. Ofof. > > Makes perfect sense :) Yes, I can easily tell it's a froggery because it's too legible to be from the real murphy. <snicker>
Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-06 22:43 +1000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-06 19:21 +0000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-07 20:33 +1000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 19:24 +0000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 06:49 +0100
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-07 20:33 +1000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-07 06:14 -0500
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-07 05:53 -0700
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-12 11:39 +0100
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 17:18 +0100
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 19:48 +0000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 14:26 +0100
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 00:37 +1000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 16:13 +0100
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 19:58 +0000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 13:14 +1000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-08 10:24 +0100
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 21:26 +1000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-08 15:21 +0100
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-08 20:07 +0000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? The Inconvenient Truth <trvth@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-07 18:37 +0000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 19:55 +0000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-08 10:36 +0100
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-12 11:55 +0100
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-12 20:06 +0100
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-13 09:18 +0100
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-13 12:40 +0100
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-13 23:35 +1000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-14 06:44 +0100
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 13:11 +1000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-08 10:27 +0100
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-07-07 12:33 -0400
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-08 06:03 +0200
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Skeeter DoW #8 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-08 02:23 -0600
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-09 07:46 +0200
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-09 10:45 +0200
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-09 20:13 +0000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 07:00 +0200
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-11 00:07 +0000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-11 07:24 +0200
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-11 20:47 +0000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 06:09 +0200
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 07:05 +0200
Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-08 19:27 +0000
Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-09 06:41 +0200
Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-09 20:14 +0000
Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-09 13:33 -0700
Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-09 22:33 +0200
Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Skeeter DoW #8 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-09 15:36 -0600
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 05:59 +0200
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1 <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx.gamy> - 2016-07-10 01:12 -0500
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "LOL TerribleTard" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 09:30 +0200
Re: look how i made him flip out again. Skeeter DoW #420 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-10 03:53 -0600
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-10 22:34 +0000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-11 07:49 +0200
Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1 <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx.pelt> - 2016-07-09 21:17 -0500
Re: Nads Skeeter DoW #420 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-09 20:22 -0600
Re: Nads Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-10 02:37 +0000
Re: Nads Skeeter DoW #420 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-09 20:45 -0600
Re: Nads "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-09 19:49 -0700
Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 05:35 +0200
Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1 <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx.bum> - 2016-07-10 01:11 -0500
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 05:43 +0200
Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:25 +1000
Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 19:47 +0000
Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-07 13:45 -0700
Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Skeeter DoW #8 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-07 14:49 -0600
[bullshit redact] woz -- * love Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 13:18 +1000
Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-07-12 13:49 +0100
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-07-07 05:56 -0700
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-07 20:32 +1000
Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-07 05:30 -0700
csiph-web